It didn't actually do too bad in the video tbh, obviously not the best case for it but interesting none the less. Also, as mentioned in my above post, if HUB did what most pc gamers would do i.e. swap out dlss for newer versions as well as ensuring all post processing effects were turned off, the issues they had with dlss here would have most likely been solved.....
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
DLSS Momentum Continues: 50 Released and Upcoming DLSS 3 Games, Over 250 DLSS Games and Creative Apps Available Now
- Thread starter Nexus18
- Start date
It didn't actually do too bad in the video tbh, obviously not the best case for it but interesting none the less. Also, as mentioned in my above post, if HUB did what most pc gamers would do i.e. swap out dlss for newer versions as well as ensuring all post processing effects were turned off, the issues they had with dlss here would have most likely been solved.....
NVIDIA Big Interview - Ray Tracing, DLSS, RTX Remix & More
A few weeks ago, we had the pleasure of interviewing Luke Spring, NVIDIA's EMEA GeForce Communications Lead.
www.dsogaming.com
Not great answers there and dsogaming should have pushed the fact that fsr 3 fg mod is working pretty well (dependent on the game)
Starfield: FSR 3 vs DLSS 3 vs XeSS Comparison Review
Starfield has finally been updated with official support for AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution 3, featuring Frame Generation technology, and Intel's Xe Super Sampling (XeSS 1.2) upscaler. Bethesda have also improved the quality of their DLSS implementation. In this mini-review we compare the...
I do wonder what is next for DLSS outside of just improving the current IQ etc. I'm wondering if we might see a combination of DLDSR and DLSS in one setting perhaps as very few people are aware of the benefits of combining DLSS with DLDSR and it is a bit more of a faff to setup (less so thanks to the new nvidia app)
Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons Remake im Technik-Test: Benchmarks (FHD, WQHD & UHD), Frametimes und VRAM
Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons im Test: Benchmarks (FHD, WQHD & UHD), Frametimes und VRAM / Das Testsystem und die Benchmark-Szene
www.computerbase.de
Computerbase usually rate dlss etc. over native but never seen them use the word "superior"
Not that I pay much attention to what driver panels recommend for graphical settings but I've noticed in the new nvidia app, for the majority of the games, nvidia are now recommending DLDSR res. with DLSS balanced/performance over native/dlss quality at stock res. Was this the case with geforce now experience game optimisation recommendations too? Can't say I'm surprised though as based on all the games I've tested, DLSS perf and 1.78x dldsr does look better than dlss quality and native.
Depends on the game I find e.g. in the last of us, DLSS perf and 1.78 runs better than dlss quality at 3440x1440 but generally dlss perf and 1.78x will run about 10-20 fps slower than dlss quality at 3440x1440.
For me it's a long term GPU, should last its 5yr warranty easy as I know I can just upgrade the CPU to an uplift in fps averages too if/when the time comes that this is needed
You know fine well you are not getting 5 years out of it
As soon as 50xx arrives, you'll be all over it! 
That won't stop pc gamers with an itch
It's the 5080 I'll be interested in but a 5090 could be tempting if < £1600, no way we'll ever see a repeat of the 3080 to 3090 perf and price difference again.
I must say this is very true though, recent UE 5 games have been running very well and also highly optimised on the vram front too, using very little compared to some of the non UE 5 games from last year.
I also think we'll see start to see RT/PT getting better optimised too especially as devs start to focus less on raster methods.
It's up to the game devs which preset to use. But the recommended one by nvidia is preset d as it offers better temporal stability sometimes where as c will have less temporal stability but better motion so devs probably don't do any testing themselves even though it clearly states in nvidias guidance to do their own testing to find which works best
I think we'll see better prices with 50xx but it is going to still be crap in the grand scheme of things:
5090 - probably like £1600+
5080 - probably £1000 (offering 4090 matching or beating perf)
5070 - probably £700
Of course 5080 will look like a bargain given the 4090 cost but not really a bargain..... And then of course amd will come in £50-100 cheaper
I think there was rumours they're pulling out from the high/flagship end, which makes sense tbf as imo nvidia just can't be touched here when amd are charging similar price for a lesser package overall so they either need to price a comfortable 20-25% lower or just try and win the market share back at the most popular gpus tier.
Frame Generation von AMD und Nvidia im Vergleich: Analysen und Schlusswort
DLSS 3 vs. FSR 3 im Test: Analysen und Schlusswort / Die Analyse von Frame Generation
www.computerbase.de
Frame generation wise is on par (when FSR 3 doesn't have issues that is) but as we all know, upscaling wise, FSR has a long way to go.
DF Direct Weekly #152: Industry Lay-Offs Continue, Devs Take Back Control, Yuzu vs Nintendo
Another big DF Direct Weekly sees John, Rich and Alex tackle the massive issue of lay-offs in the industry along with the welcome response from some develope...www.youtube.com
Streamline used by Windows to support multiple upscalers. This was originally thought but as Alex says "AMD didn't want to support it" - But now that MS are taking over and baking in the framework at an OS level, you either lose out or be part of it, so this is good and potentially makes upscaling support for all games as long as the game can expose itself to the framework, I guess older games simply need a mod to show themselves to the framework rather than a modder having to inject upscaling.
All good looking ahead.
I'm sure amd are delighted that Microsoft are basically taking up nvidias idea and now not having any choice or excuses but to get onboard
Following on from that, looks like FSR powered by AI hardware will only be possible on RDNA3 and above, and going by chatter on [H] and elsewhere, likely won't see RDNA4 until AI-FSR is ready, but if PS5 Pro uses it too, then that will likely take priority for obvious reasons. So once again lagging behind in the PC space for AMD:
News - AMD confirms it is working on an AI upscaler for gaming – CTO Papermaster says it's part of 'AI enabling our entire portfolio
AMD's CTO Mark Papermaster confirmed in an interview that it is working on an AI upscaler for gaming. This could be the next major update for FSR. AMD confirms it is working on an AI upscaler for gaming – CTO Papermaster says it's part of 'AI enabling our entire portfolio : Read moreforums.tomshardware.com
Pretty sure Sony have said they're working on their own upscaling solution? It's a shame amd are so far behind here and they have the over the fence approach, powering consoles and obviously having that relationship with both microsoft and sony, they really could have excelled with fsr.
Wonder if amd will get the same **** then for locking their tech to certain gpus as nvidia do?
If it works well, it's a good move as heck look at me and others with nvidia gpus, we can't and don't want to move to amd because of how good nvidias feature set is. AMD need to start doing the same. The key thing they will need to do is make sure they take ownership in the development and improvement of this or at least provide a t shirt size like nvidia do because if they just throw it over the fence again and expect devs to do the tuning themselves, well then it'll be repeat of FSR 1-3 again with inconsistent results and more often than not just being poor.