Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ironically no one who cares about latency, that being competitive and pro gamers, cares about frame gen because it increases latency and so none of them use frame gen. Pro gamers run games at native resolution and use gaming monitors with Pulsar tech to simulate 1000hz without the latency of fake frames.
So the people who do use frame gen, probably don't care or won't notice the latency anyway so reducing is a bit moot, pro gamers still won't use frame gen unless it adds 0ms latency
If you are trying to read YouTube videos, that is probably where you are going wrong.TLDR? Did it make you want a 5090?![]()
It's only 27 mins long, the whole thing is worth watching as it gives some good insight into engineering behind DLSS and why nothing else will come close for a long time.
Only within the context of running the PC version at PS5 pro resolution (1800p) and thenn using Performance mode vs Quality which you would never do on PC at that sort of output res.According to DF, after the latest update for PSSR in the latest Star Wars, it now looks like better than dlss in that game
+ "sharper" can be more of a thing derived from some sharpening filter.Only within the context of running the PC version at PS5 pro resolution (1800p) and thenn using Performance mode vs Quality which you would never do on PC at that sort of output res.
Plus he does not say if he used the latest dll for DLSS as opposed to the shipping version which is pre-3.7 DLSS.
So no, it is not as good as DLSS on PC.
that would be a good move by nvidia especially with all these hacks to enable fsr frame gen with dlss enabled in some titles. more looking forward to dlss 4 with there transformer model and the improvements that come with itI watched this and he said they might try to back port FG to 3000 series.
I watched this and he said they might try to back port FG to 3000 series.
It does support FG, just not nvidias flavour of FG.I think it was a mistake and they meant 4000 series as the 3000 series doesn't even support FG.
I thought he said older hardware so not specificI think it was a mistake and they meant 4000 series as the 3000 series doesn't even support FG.
It does support FG, just not nvidias flavour of FG.
NO. FG has moved to tensor cores - skip to 13.06We are talking about Nvidia's FG which requires the optical flow accelerator.
I have no idea how I managed to see that quote from that far back, my badThe quote from my post!
![]()