Soldato
- Joined
- 4 Apr 2003
- Posts
- 8,059
Seems to be a good chance this was actually the Russian who obtained the nerve toxin and was then progressing with it and exposed it, rather than him being poisoned by a third party.
Could also be possible that he was actually a triple agent and his daughter was going to smuggle British Nerve agents back to Russia which he had obtained from the nearby storage facility, but something went wrong.
But the most likely explanation right now is still that Russia took him out.
Could also be possible that he was actually a triple agent and his daughter was going to smuggle British Nerve agents back to Russia which he had obtained from the nearby storage facility, but something went wrong.
But the most likely explanation right now is still that Russia took him out.
Seems to be a good chance this was actually the Russian who obtained the nerve toxin and was then progressing with it and exposed it, rather than him being poisoned by a third party.
I'm thinking more his daughter could have brought nerve agent from Russia and they botched it up and poisoned themselves. Just an idea.
Could also be possible that he was actually a triple agent and his daughter was going to smuggle British Nerve agents back to Russia which he had obtained from the nearby storage facility, but something went wrong.
But the most likely explanation right now is still that Russia took him out.
The KGB spiked her perfume with a nerve agent designed to become toxic when it's airborne particles mixed with those of his favourite deodorant! :OI do wonder if there is a connection there that the daughter was somehow coerced or unknowingly used to carry it out or something.
Seems to be a good chance you actually have no idea.
Imagine the flak the police would cop if a child (edit: Same goes for anyone effected, but I just pictured children as being more prone/inclined to investigating stuff than adults) finds any trace they miss.You've seen the scale of clean up going on at the moment?
Can't really see a reason for that but I do wonder if there is a connection there that the daughter was somehow coerced or unknowingly used to carry it out or something..
No exceptions? Gareth Williams and the ensuing ludicrous cover-up springs to mind. Let's not forget David Kelly, either.
Sure, someone else may have killed them, and we'll likely never know the truth about it. But MI5 is authorized to commit crimes on UK territory, and everything about this remains hush.
However the BBC have reported he was seen regularly meeting with a suited British gentleman in recent months who spoke fluent Russian. It could be that MI6/Russia/third party were trying to get him to come out of retirement and Russia/MI6/etc took him out as a potential threat.
I've always been amazed that it's often possible to trace these agents back to an individual lab of origin. Magnificent little boffins!
http://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/not-told-russian-spy-sergei-skripal/
It's amazing what people believe without any evidence. The MSM always tells the truth though, right?
But I moved long ago past a world view where my country are the “goodies” and Russians are the “baddies”, and instead I reached an understanding that those in power oppress the people, universally.
So if it remains hush how do you know about it then?
MI5 agents are allowed to carry out criminal activity in the UK, the government has acknowledged for the first time.
...
However, guidance about when British spies can commit crimes, and how far they can go, remains confidential.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...re-allowed-to-commit-in-uk-government-reveals
But you don't suppose that this perhaps involves things like breaking into property, making use of forged documents etc.. rather than actually carrying out assassinations?