Are they? Evidence please.
think you need to step away from the thread....
Are they? Evidence please.
They could, for example, say mass spectometry has been performed on these samples, and they are show pre-cursers/components consistant with those from those 'destroyed' stockpiles ... at the moment if you were on a jury, with the facts you know, would your verdict be guilty.... they've confirmed they know the type of nerve agent used and that it is Russian. They've not revealed the details of the extent of the UK's ability to detect these
was that just a reference to https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...s-one-of-its-own-young-princes-for-murder-fo/depends on the child killing Saudi Prince that's just arrived
The prince’s motive for suicide has been British officials’ harsh efforts to deport him from UK, as reported by the Saudi media sources
..
Here is another footage of the Prince Bandar in which he is defending the corruption and bribery charges leveled against him:
Whereas ALL other media outlets have no experts of any sort at all - other than Marketing executives and Telephone Sanitisers.The [...] BBC news programmes are full of so called experts, of varying calibre![]()
They could, for example, say mass spectometry has been performed on these samples, and they are show pre-cursers/components consistant with those from those 'destroyed' stockpiles ... at the moment if you were on a jury, with the facts you know, would your verdict be guilty.
Boris, as ever, just appears smug in (Marr) interviews, did he intentionally raise the stakes with his UK had evidence that Russia, within the last 10 years comments.
It is unclear what the OPCW will pronounce/determine to confrim whether Russia is responsible ? if anything they may dilute the case by only confirming it is a Novichok.
To anybody with a Whitehall background this has been obvious for several days. The government has never said the nerve agent was made in Russia, or that it can only be made in Russia. The exact formulation “of a type developed by Russia” was used by Theresa May in parliament, used by the UK at the UN Security Council, used by Boris Johnson on the BBC yesterday and, most tellingly of all, “of a type developed by Russia” is the precise phrase used in the joint communique issued by the UK, USA, France and Germany yesterday:
[...]
Porton Down is still not certain it is the Russians who have apparently synthesised a “Novichok”. Hence “Of a type developed by Russia”. Note developed, not made, produced or manufactured.
It is very carefully worded propaganda. Of a type developed by liars.
UPDATE
This post prompted another old colleague to get in touch. On the bright side, the FCO have persuaded Boris he has to let the OPCW investigate a sample. But not just yet. The expectation is the inquiry committee will be chaired by a Chinese delegate. The Boris plan is to get the OPCW also to sign up to the “as developed by Russia” formula, and diplomacy to this end is being undertaken in Beijing right now.
I don’t suppose there is any sign of the BBC doing any actual journalism on this?
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/03/of-a-type-developed-by-liars/
was that just a reference to https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...s-one-of-its-own-young-princes-for-murder-fo/
seem a legitimate use of corporal punishment under AE legislation.
Equally the unfortunate suicide was apparently becasue the guy was being deported from the UK, so if anything UK unusually, acting against AE
well I'm not sure that really adds much... to them stating that they've tested the samples and identified the agent
I guess he perhaps did, wonder what Danny75 makes of it:
seems Boris is prepared to go a bit further than the claims re: propaganda and misdirection from that blog
I doubt it, I suspect it was a reference to the campaign in Yemen
But Boris is a known liar?
I guess he perhaps did, wonder what Danny75 makes of it:
To be fair to StriderX, up till now and throughout Brexit (and various other affairs Boris has been involved in), Boris et al had been labelled as liars. And yet now he, and May might I add, are the nation's saviours 'Standing up to Putin'. I don't doubt the severity of the situation, but I can't help but think the government's exploiting it. It's been some time since May's been held in a positive light by the media in general. Think back the coughing episode and her approval rating then compared to now. People are fickle. Or I am overly cynical.It's cute how you think when it come's to international politics there are people who tell the truth and people who lie
I also know someone from the intelligence community and you know what they told me? Nothing, ever, in decades, I don't even know what they do.
I assume your intelligence community friends are either idiots telling mr blabbermouth anything or you're full of S.
Not much until they present the evidence. Boris could just be doubling down, aware that plenty are sceptical.
Russian culture is worlds apart from ours, cheating is basically considered acceptable as long as you don't get caught. It can actually be a point of pride to win while cheating and not get caught.
If the NATO allies (& others) can all be convinced of Russian guilty from OPCW, then a bouycott of the Football would nonetheless be a message to the Russian public.For those who don't believe that Putin would "imperil the World Cup"
Summary – addition of information and advice for British nationals currently in Russia or due to travel in the coming weeks; due to heightened political tensions between the UK and Russia, you should be aware of the possibility of anti-British sentiment or harassment at this time; you’re advised to remain vigilant, avoid any protests or demonstrations and avoid commenting publically on political developments
no need to patronize us.Hint, nothing to do with the WC
well it completely undermines the claim in that blog post that is entirely based on the idea that they've very carefully chosen to use only specific words etc..etc..
If the UK was in possession of intelligence about a secret Russian chemical weapons programme, it was not under a legal obligation to tell Andrew Marr, but it was under a legal obligation to tell the OPCW. Not only did the UK fail to do that, the UK Ambassador Sir Geoffrey Adams was last year fulsomely congratulating the OPCW on the completion of the destruction of Russia’s chemical weapons stocks, without a single hint or reservation entered that Russia may have undeclared or secret stocks.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/arch...es-completely-new-story-on-russian-novichoks/
“We have no idea what Mr Murray is referring to. The Prime Minister told MP’s on Monday that world leading experts at Porton Down had positively identified this chemical agent. It is clear that it is a military grade nerve agent of a type developed by Russia. None of that is in any doubt”.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/arch...urces-on-porton-down-the-most-hilarious-fail/
I have now been sent the vital information that in late 2016, Iranian scientists set out to study whether novichoks really could be produced from commercially available ingredients. Iran succeeded* in synthesising a number of novichoks. Iran did this in full cooperation with the OPCW and immediately reported the results to the OPCW so they could be added to the chemical weapons database.
This makes complete nonsense of the Theresa May’s “of a type developed by Russia” line, used to parliament and the UN Security Council. This explains why Porton Down have refused to cave in to governmental pressure to say the nerve agent was Russian. If Iran can make a novichok, so can a significant number of states.
* http://www.spectroscopynow.com/deta...heck=1,1,1,1,1&&tzcheck=1&tzcheck=1&tzcheck=1
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/arch...in-2017-by-iran-in-cooperation-with-the-opcw/
USSR actually.* the nerve agent was invented in Russia
Uzbekistan technically.* it was mass produced in Russia
Several have.* no other country makes it
One out of four ain't bad* it was used to attack a former Russian spy who betrayed his country
Not particularly solid, but TBH it's good enough for me, the whole thing has Putin's MO all over it, especially as it has just turned what would have been a lacklustre election performance into a personal best for him lol.That looks like a pretty solid case to me.