Former Russian double agent seriously ill in Salisbury.

... they've confirmed they know the type of nerve agent used and that it is Russian. They've not revealed the details of the extent of the UK's ability to detect these
They could, for example, say mass spectometry has been performed on these samples, and they are show pre-cursers/components consistant with those from those 'destroyed' stockpiles ... at the moment if you were on a jury, with the facts you know, would your verdict be guilty.


Boris, as ever, just appears smug in (Marr) interviews, did he intentionally raise the stakes with his UK had evidence that Russia, within the last 10 years comments.
It is unclear what the OPCW will pronounce/determine to confrim whether Russia is responsible ? if anything they may dilute the case by only confirming it is a Novichok.



depends on the child killing Saudi Prince that's just arrived
was that just a reference to https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...s-one-of-its-own-young-princes-for-murder-fo/
seem a legitimate use of corporal punishment under AE legislation.
Equally the unfortunate suicide was apparently becasue the guy was being deported from the UK, so if anything UK unusually, acting against AE
The prince’s motive for suicide has been British officials’ harsh efforts to deport him from UK, as reported by the Saudi media sources
..
Here is another footage of the Prince Bandar in which he is defending the corruption and bribery charges leveled against him:

spectrometry
 
Last edited:
They could, for example, say mass spectometry has been performed on these samples, and they are show pre-cursers/components consistant with those from those 'destroyed' stockpiles ... at the moment if you were on a jury, with the facts you know, would your verdict be guilty.

well I'm not sure that really adds much... to them stating that they've tested the samples and identified the agent

Boris, as ever, just appears smug in (Marr) interviews, did he intentionally raise the stakes with his UK had evidence that Russia, within the last 10 years comments.
It is unclear what the OPCW will pronounce/determine to confrim whether Russia is responsible ? if anything they may dilute the case by only confirming it is a Novichok.

I guess he perhaps did, wonder what Danny75 makes of it:

To anybody with a Whitehall background this has been obvious for several days. The government has never said the nerve agent was made in Russia, or that it can only be made in Russia. The exact formulation “of a type developed by Russia” was used by Theresa May in parliament, used by the UK at the UN Security Council, used by Boris Johnson on the BBC yesterday and, most tellingly of all, “of a type developed by Russia” is the precise phrase used in the joint communique issued by the UK, USA, France and Germany yesterday:

[...]

Porton Down is still not certain it is the Russians who have apparently synthesised a “Novichok”. Hence “Of a type developed by Russia”. Note developed, not made, produced or manufactured.

It is very carefully worded propaganda. Of a type developed by liars.
UPDATE

This post prompted another old colleague to get in touch. On the bright side, the FCO have persuaded Boris he has to let the OPCW investigate a sample. But not just yet. The expectation is the inquiry committee will be chaired by a Chinese delegate. The Boris plan is to get the OPCW also to sign up to the “as developed by Russia” formula, and diplomacy to this end is being undertaken in Beijing right now.

I don’t suppose there is any sign of the BBC doing any actual journalism on this?

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/03/of-a-type-developed-by-liars/

seems Boris is prepared to go a bit further than the claims re: propaganda and misdirection from that blog

was that just a reference to https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...s-one-of-its-own-young-princes-for-murder-fo/
seem a legitimate use of corporal punishment under AE legislation.
Equally the unfortunate suicide was apparently becasue the guy was being deported from the UK, so if anything UK unusually, acting against AE

I doubt it, I suspect it was a reference to the campaign in Yemen
 
well I'm not sure that really adds much... to them stating that they've tested the samples and identified the agent



I guess he perhaps did, wonder what Danny75 makes of it:



seems Boris is prepared to go a bit further than the claims re: propaganda and misdirection from that blog



I doubt it, I suspect it was a reference to the campaign in Yemen

But Boris is a known liar?
 
I guess he perhaps did, wonder what Danny75 makes of it:

Not much until they present the evidence. Boris could just be doubling down, aware that plenty are sceptical.

I already know games are being played. That doesn't mean everything in the game will be untrue. A game is being played because the UK authorities had nine days to come up with "developed in Russia", the UK police are saying the investigation could take months, and then the government only gave Russia (less than) two days to track down if it came from them, AND refused to provide them samples in order to do so. The ultimatum was designed to be impossible for Russia.

Whether or not the UK cabinet had advance notice of what was to happen to Skripal, they are milking it for all it's worth. The timing of certain things is extremely interesting as well.
 
It's cute how you think when it come's to international politics there are people who tell the truth and people who lie
To be fair to StriderX, up till now and throughout Brexit (and various other affairs Boris has been involved in), Boris et al had been labelled as liars. And yet now he, and May might I add, are the nation's saviours 'Standing up to Putin'. I don't doubt the severity of the situation, but I can't help but think the government's exploiting it. It's been some time since May's been held in a positive light by the media in general. Think back the coughing episode and her approval rating then compared to now. People are fickle. Or I am overly cynical.
 
FWIW, those I know who are associated with the intelligence community and foreign affairs in Whitehall, all are unanimous that the finger points to Russia ...

For the record, all of them were also screaming blue murder re: Iraq (and virtually everything that followed) ... so they're certainly not people who just fall in line.

For those who don't believe that Putin would "imperil the World Cup" ... the UK government has been looking the other way as ex-pat critics of the regime drop like flies here - a ridiculous policy that emboldened the elimination strategy ... as for timing, this is immediately prior to Russian elections ... most Russians with a brain know that all these were hits, and many of the voters that UR target approve of this. Also, if the assassination is botched - as it was - and fingerprints are left, then it can be spun as anti-Russian false flag propaganda by the Kremlin ... encouraging more foolish people to vote for a 'strongman' who will stand up to these bullies and liars on the world stage.

Feeding into the last point, why do people think all the disclosures about next generation weapons systems (some of which are total fantasy) happened just before the World Cup? Hint, nothing to do with the WC. Everything to do with elections. Putin and his colleagues already have virtually all the capital (works contracts) they wanted from the WC, and domestic political capital (particularly forcing workers associated with WC projects to vote for Putin / UR or be fired and not paid) ... the international political capital - they can take or leave, Russia is already a pariah in world sport due to the state doping programme.
 
Last edited:
I also know someone from the intelligence community and you know what they told me? Nothing, ever, in decades, I don't even know what they do.

I assume your intelligence community friends are either idiots telling mr blabbermouth anything or you're full of S.
 
I also know someone from the intelligence community and you know what they told me? Nothing, ever, in decades, I don't even know what they do.

I assume your intelligence community friends are either idiots telling mr blabbermouth anything or you're full of S.

Everyone talks, even if they don't to you.
 
Not much until they present the evidence. Boris could just be doubling down, aware that plenty are sceptical.

well it completely undermines the claim in that blog post that is entirely based on the idea that they've very carefully chosen to use only specific words etc..etc..
 
Russian culture is worlds apart from ours, cheating is basically considered acceptable as long as you don't get caught. It can actually be a point of pride to win while cheating and not get caught.
 
Russian culture is worlds apart from ours, cheating is basically considered acceptable as long as you don't get caught. It can actually be a point of pride to win while cheating and not get caught.

As a weightlifting fan, the entire Russian training methodolgy is based around the assumption athletes will be using drugs, and their coaches have often been reported acting with incredulity when they discover that coaches from other nations aren't turning their athletes into walking chemistry sets ("how do you expect to win?!"). They don't know how to get results any other way and seem completely indifferent about changing this, despite the sheer number of positive tests in recent Olympics leading to the IOC threatening to have the sport dropped. Worth watchign that Icarus documentary if you can.

 
For those who don't believe that Putin would "imperil the World Cup"
If the NATO allies (& others) can all be convinced of Russian guilty from OPCW, then a bouycott of the Football would nonetheless be a message to the Russian public.
However the likes of the recent Wiggins/Coe etc. accusations and older Sepp Blatter corruption mean sporting events do not have the cudos they once did.

English fans should already be a bit reticent about attending, anyway (medical insurance?), I see they update travel advice
Summary – addition of information and advice for British nationals currently in Russia or due to travel in the coming weeks; due to heightened political tensions between the UK and Russia, you should be aware of the possibility of anti-British sentiment or harassment at this time; you’re advised to remain vigilant, avoid any protests or demonstrations and avoid commenting publically on political developments


[
Hint, nothing to do with the WC
no need to patronize us.
]


I dont know whether May thought Boris was being put into a position where he could do no harm, but both his and Gavin Williamson behaviour, do not help UK's credibility on world stage - (other than Trump) are there other foreign countries ministers with faux pas's. ?
 
well it completely undermines the claim in that blog post that is entirely based on the idea that they've very carefully chosen to use only specific words etc..etc..

Murray has addressed the statement from Boris. Worth a read:

If the UK was in possession of intelligence about a secret Russian chemical weapons programme, it was not under a legal obligation to tell Andrew Marr, but it was under a legal obligation to tell the OPCW. Not only did the UK fail to do that, the UK Ambassador Sir Geoffrey Adams was last year fulsomely congratulating the OPCW on the completion of the destruction of Russia’s chemical weapons stocks, without a single hint or reservation entered that Russia may have undeclared or secret stocks.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/arch...es-completely-new-story-on-russian-novichoks/


Also interesting is the FCO's reply to the allegations by Murray:

“We have no idea what Mr Murray is referring to. The Prime Minister told MP’s on Monday that world leading experts at Porton Down had positively identified this chemical agent. It is clear that it is a military grade nerve agent of a type developed by Russia. None of that is in any doubt”.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/arch...urces-on-porton-down-the-most-hilarious-fail/

As you can see, no attempt is made to refute anything, only to obscure what Murray explained regarding it, and feign ignorance of the point he was making. Very worrying if they are sincere, that members of this forum can understand his point perfectly (even if they don't agree or disbelieve) but the FCO lacks the intelligence to do the same.
 
More:

I have now been sent the vital information that in late 2016, Iranian scientists set out to study whether novichoks really could be produced from commercially available ingredients. Iran succeeded* in synthesising a number of novichoks. Iran did this in full cooperation with the OPCW and immediately reported the results to the OPCW so they could be added to the chemical weapons database.

This makes complete nonsense of the Theresa May’s “of a type developed by Russia” line, used to parliament and the UN Security Council. This explains why Porton Down have refused to cave in to governmental pressure to say the nerve agent was Russian. If Iran can make a novichok, so can a significant number of states.

* http://www.spectroscopynow.com/deta...heck=1,1,1,1,1&&tzcheck=1&tzcheck=1&tzcheck=1

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/arch...in-2017-by-iran-in-cooperation-with-the-opcw/
 
* the nerve agent was invented in Russia
USSR actually.

* it was mass produced in Russia
Uzbekistan technically.

* no other country makes it
Several have.

* it was used to attack a former Russian spy who betrayed his country
One out of four ain't bad :P

That looks like a pretty solid case to me.
Not particularly solid, but TBH it's good enough for me, the whole thing has Putin's MO all over it, especially as it has just turned what would have been a lacklustre election performance into a personal best for him lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom