Soldato
You are conflating your `opinion` and the morality you hold to that opinion and the law.
Harry and Meghan to resign
- Thread starter Dirk Diggler
- Start date
You are conflating your `opinion` and the morality you hold to that opinion and the law.
Ironically Mr Moralitydurf is a sex worker.Genuinely, why won't you work with anyone under the age of 22? Have you got wandering eyes, hands and on the register or something?
You don't need to be so obtuse - not sure why you all get so angsty. All I am pointing out is that it is odd we call him a nonce because "someone decided" a number in the US when the number in the UK is less than that. This is ignoring the fact he doesn't seem to have broken any state law w.r.t age of consent :S
Is someone a nonce who goes on holiday from NY to Florida, for example?
Soldato
No, it doesn't depend on where he stayed, it depends on crossing state lines.
I've summarised the three known allegations already here:
Unless you've got another one to add to the mix then the only legal issue I can see is re: the US Virgin Islands and whether she was 17 or 18 at the time of that encouter.
Beyond that, I've not seen any allegations re: Andrew crossing state lines with her for the purpose of sex or similar. He was staying with Epstein in NYC and she allegedly slept with him there but he didn't arrange for her to be there etc.. Epstine is the trafficker there.
Again its down to where; trafficking is the person or persons doing it ; Maxwell and Epstein and not the one receiving, in this case (and a lot of others ) Andrew.
Manhattan , New Mexico, Palm Beach and the 2 islands being the 4 locations i knew of (therefore) when did she go to Little St James.
Soldato
no. This is your `opinion` based on your own morality and isnt the law.
Not even sure what you are saying to be honest.
You are using apostrophes not quote marks, btw.
Not seeing the issue tbh. How often do they visit the UK? Once a year... Seems a waste to have an empty property sat there. If Andrew is no longer a working Royal then rightly so he shouldn't be getting a penny off the state. If he can fund the costs of staying in his 30 bed mansion from his own money then that's upto him, if he can't then he needs to be evicted.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2012
- Posts
- 3,189
cba
Last edited:
Sorry but are you just not reading the information already given, why are you asking me when she went to Little St James?
Again the applicability of Federal law is not "down to where" Andrew stayed or had encounters, Federal law already covers the entire United States, it doesn't matter where in the United States someone is, the Federal Age of consent pertains to crossing state lines... that's where Federal law comes in instead of state law.
So even if the age of consent is 16 in both locations if you cross from one state to another to have sex then it's Federal law that applies.
If you think otherwise and are going to carry on claiming "it's down to where" then provide a source that shows how it can simply apply to a local situation and superseded state/local law. It doesn't matter where in the US, it matters that state lines are crossed, otherwise local/state law applies not Federal.
Last edited:
Soldato
Soldato
Sorry but are you just not reading the information already given, why are you asking me when she went to Little St James?
Again the applicability of Federal law is not "down to where" Andrew stayed or had encounters, Federal law already covers the entire United States, it doesn't matter where in the United States someone is, the Federal Age of consent pertains to crossing state lines... that's where Federal law comes in instead of state law.
So even if the age of consent is 16 in both locations if you cross from one state to another to have sex then it's Federal law that applies.
If you think otherwise and are going to carry on claiming "it's down to where" then provide a source that shows how it can simply apply to a local situation and superseded state/local law. It doesn't matter where in the US, it matters that state lines are crossed, otherwise local/state law applies not Federal.
Another dowie hole of denial. Please access the evidence she gave. She was trafficked around various locations, and met many men including Andrew at all of them.
Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2012
- Posts
- 3,189
LMAO where is my popcorn
Caporegime
That mod edit above is hilarious, there's still another baseless accusation right above it.
Not surprised our resident OnlyFansCel is projecting again though.
Not surprised our resident OnlyFansCel is projecting again though.
Last edited:
Soldato
This is a very hypocritical post.
Eh??? Where have I denied that she was trafficked, you're just throwing inane replies in here. If you're going to make a claim then just support it, I've pointed out that she allegedly had encounters with Andrew in at least 3 locations and I've corrected a claim you made re: Andrew and re: Federal law.
If you're going to disagree with something I've posted then at least be clear about what exactly you're disagreeing with as I've literally supported what I've said with links and you've provided nothing.
Last edited:
Caporegime
Look can we not drag this down to pragmatic and rational explanations; the enraged eviction / paedo angle is far more couth.
I'm really curious about what each of the Royals inherited when both Prince Philip and the Queen died... Andrew isn't being evicted per se but rather the rumour is that it's a cut to his 250k allowance that could force the move as the upkeep of his current home with swimming pool and 98 acres is quite a bit more expensive than Frogmore Cottage's upkeep.
www.independent.co.uk
But if that's the reason then he can't have got much from his parents, there seems to have been estimates of say circa 30 million for Prince Phillip but frankly, I'm not sure anyone has any good idea about what his net worth was, more relevant though is the Queen in terms of her personal wealth she apparently had a circa £500 million stock portfolio and that isn't liable for inheritance tax.
I don't see any good reason why that apparent 500 million wasn't split 4 ways among her kids as both the reigning monarch and the Prince of Wales are already, essentially, either centimillionaires or billionaires in the same way that any centimillionaire/billionaire with a trust fund/family business empire they can't sell is; they have independent the annual incomes from the Duchy of Lancaster (600+million estate, annual income £24 million) and Duchy of Cornwall (1 billion estate, £21 million annual income) respectively. (Seperate to the 80 million received from the Crown Estate last year to pay for annual Royal Household running costs/Buckingham Palace refurbishment etc..)
But clearly, if this story is true, Andrew presumably didn't get very much of the Queen's privately held wealth in the will if even a cut to his £250k annual income would leave him struggling with bills in his current place.
Prince Andrew ‘resisting’ move into Frogmore Cottage
Reports of the disgraced royal’s reluctance to move out of current home arrive as Duke and Duchess of Sussex confirm they were asked to ‘vacate’ their 10-bedroom property in Windsor
www.independent.co.uk
But if that's the reason then he can't have got much from his parents, there seems to have been estimates of say circa 30 million for Prince Phillip but frankly, I'm not sure anyone has any good idea about what his net worth was, more relevant though is the Queen in terms of her personal wealth she apparently had a circa £500 million stock portfolio and that isn't liable for inheritance tax.
I don't see any good reason why that apparent 500 million wasn't split 4 ways among her kids as both the reigning monarch and the Prince of Wales are already, essentially, either centimillionaires or billionaires in the same way that any centimillionaire/billionaire with a trust fund/family business empire they can't sell is; they have independent the annual incomes from the Duchy of Lancaster (600+million estate, annual income £24 million) and Duchy of Cornwall (1 billion estate, £21 million annual income) respectively. (Seperate to the 80 million received from the Crown Estate last year to pay for annual Royal Household running costs/Buckingham Palace refurbishment etc..)
But clearly, if this story is true, Andrew presumably didn't get very much of the Queen's privately held wealth in the will if even a cut to his £250k annual income would leave him struggling with bills in his current place.
Last edited: