Soldato
- Joined
- 7 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 19,483
- Location
- LU7
Yes because they've signed up to a group that won't use KERS next season.So this would be about the first time in the history of F1, where a team willingly removes a gizmo that gives them a decisive advantage. In 1994 when the rules were revised and Williams had to de-evolve their 1993 car, which was arguably the most high-tech F1 car ever built, they were not happy. But they did it because the rules required it.
Yes. What is the problem here? You don't believe McLaren will not use KERS next year? Or understand why they would?What you are saying is that McLaren, though the rules don't require it, will willingly take off the gizmo, to allow other teams to either move ahead of them or close the gap on them.
LinkyWikipedia KERS page said:But all the 2009 F1 teams have agreed to drop KERS for 2010 as teams such as Ferrari and BMW have discovered that the power advantage it gives is not worth the extra weight the cars have to carry.
So you don't believe none of the FOTA cars in 2010 won't be running KERS?I just can't get my head around this concept, especially when you consider that teams spend £Millions every year, developing a car just so that it can go fractions of a second faster.
It isn't the FIA rules that obliges McLaren to race in 2010 without KERS. It is an agreement between the FOTA teams because on the whole the FOTA teams don't like KERS and McLaren, like it or not, won't use KERS next year.I believe a team would rather win than come 2nd. Even if that means using equipment (KERS) that other teams have decided not to use. Remember, the FIA is not banning KERS, hence, it is well within the rules.
It won't be slower than the other cars. It is almost as if you think McLaren without KERS next year would be slower than the other cars? I think it is the illegal things that means McLaren is trying to rebuild its reputation amongst the other teams. If not running KERS helps them get along with the other teams, and allow them to take part in a say in the future of F1, why wouldn't they?I know that Brits love losers and underdogs, but building a car which is slower is something that I can't see McLaren doing. McLaren have in the past done everything possible (legal and illegal) to win and now they have the opportunity to gain an advantage with a legal device, they are going to throw it away???
Sure. I can't see Martin Whitmarsh deciding to run KERS just so that they increase their chances of winning when it would affect their reputation with the other teams. Of course they want to beat each other on the track but need/want to get on off the track for the good of the sport.Anyway, lets just wait and see what happens.