Soldato
Wasn't there another team wanting to sign up for the 2010 championship and got refused as there were already 10 teams, maybe now they can take the place of BMW?
No, I don't think that anyone understands why Toyota persist in F1, it seems to be a complete mysteryim not sure why Toyota are persisting either tbh..
Toyota aren't a successful motor manufacturer[Toyota's] entire new range of cars is drivel and . . . they [aren't] successful ...
None of the teams are saying they don't want to reduce costs - they just want to go about it a different way and in steps. Last I heard they thought they could get to max's target (£40m?) a year after what he wanted, which when you think about it is still bloody good (from ~£300m to £40m in 3 or 4 years).Max has been banging on about reducing costs for year yet everyone was critical of him. He knew things were unsustainable but the diehard petrol head ‘dinosaurs’ didn’t want to hear it.
whereas BMW are in Hinwil, Germany.
None of the teams are saying they don't want to reduce costs - they just want to go about it a different way and in steps. Last I heard they thought they could get to max's target (£40m?) a year after what he wanted, which when you think about it is still bloody good (from ~£300m to £40m in 3 or 4 years).
Lola and Prodrive were denied. Problem is, both are in the UK whereas BMW are in Hinwil, Germany.
.
Oh dear we are back to the three car team debate again. I don't see how it can possibly work, unless every team can afford to run three cars. If you end up with some teams with three and others with two, the constructors championship is meaningless. I didn't see the point in the constructors championship in BTCC last year, because Vauxhall had three, they were statistically more likely to have more points than Seat with two cars.
Then you got to think with two cars there are problems with team orders, it would be even worse with three. They could block both sides of the track.
Honda could have secured sponsorship easily when they had the opportunity, but instead back in 2007 Simon Fuller of 19 Entertainment (he of Spice Girls fame) came on-board to get "F1 on the tips of everyone's tongues" with the 'Earth Dreams' concept.
A ridiculously glitzy launch at the National History Museum and a few "green awards," but nobody wanted to be associated with them. Two years later Honda left F1 and 19 Entertainment where long gone.
I can see Kubica getting a drive elsewhere but not so sure about Heidfeld. Maybe a safe number 2 drive?
My thinking exactly. Effectively run the 3rd car as a test car with new parts that need testing or give young drivers a chance to race in F1 without actually racing, giving them vital experience?What if teams ran 3 cars but only the top 2 could be awarded points?
Always thought BMW were pretty stupid to leave Williams and set up their own team. Apart from Ferrari have many engine manufacturers actually done well when they start their own team? Renault were OK a few years ago but not done much since. BMW/Honda/Toyota haven't exactly done well have they.Yeah someone will supply them an engine and a few parts. Pointless without a budget. I'm quite pleased because Mario and BMW where arrogant when partnered with Williams. Picking holes in williams methods and how they would do it better.
With all the cuts in testing, I'm sure the other teams will not like this.My thinking exactly. Effectively run the 3rd car as a test car with new parts that need testing or give young drivers a chance to race in F1 without actually racing, giving them vital experience?
What if teams ran 3 cars but only the top 2 could be awarded points?
Yeah. The boards and shareholders want instant results for the $$$ they spend on their F1 programs. And with this age of 24 hour media a big brand like BMW or Honda or Toyota not winning races regularly hurts.The turn up and expect to win in 3 years or it's a failure. Where it took ferrari nearly 20 years to win a title and get winning regularly. It's as though they have no idea of the sport they have entered and what it will take.
Even mclaren won in 99/00 then didnt take another title until 2008.
Its as though they don't understand the concept at all.
Well we can either have 20 car grids and some teams not happy or grids of a smaller size and poorer races for the spectators?With all the cuts in testing, I'm sure the other teams will not like this.
Yeah, the 3rd car could also act as a driving roadblock holding up the competition.It would have to be one specific car chosen at the beginning of the season not to score any points regardless of where it came, otherwise it would be unfair. If you have 3 cars running and just pick the best 2 places you would statistically be much more likely to score points than if you were running 2 cars. Even without that you would still get the team tactics from the third car interfering