• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285k 'Arrow Lake' Discussion/News ("15th gen") on LGA-1851

TrixP10 said:
except AMD didn't need to fix the power and performance didn't go backwards
Click to expand...
Well it wasn't much better either on release given 2 years had passed. My first impression of productivity is that it's a step forward, just not gaming. Completely new architecture for Intel so maybe expecting everything to be improved was unlikely to be the case.
Think a fix in Windows is required too, something Intel are aware of.
 
Last edited:
Robert896r1 said:
Ram tuning:

image.png


CB23 oc'd:
image.png


Power Draw for the above run:
image.png

IMG_4100.jpg
Click to expand...

what cooling you got there???
 
DarrenM343 said:
Well it wasn't much better either on release given 2 years have passed. My first impression of productivity is that it's a step forward, just not gaming. Completely new architecture for Intel so maybe expecting everything to be improved was unlikely to be the case.
Think a fix in Windows is required too, something Intel are aware of.
Click to expand...

2 different levels of disappointment though, gaming right now is a total crap show for intel
 
Troezar said:
It would be passable if AMD didn't have the X3D chips, the bad news is another better X3D CPU is about to launch. Oh dear...
Click to expand...
high ends a tiny fraction of the overall market.

the most used core count on steam surveys is still 6 cores

Jensen's sister will start buying leather jackets soon, it's not really good for gamers
 
Last edited:
Have to laugh at the 285K - doesn't beat the 14700K for gaming performance, barely beats it for power efficiency at gaming... while faster for productivity not enough for the higher price tag IMO unless you are doing something a lot where the 285K is specifically faster. Sadly that'll likely see the 14700K price increase rather than the 285K discounted to where it should be.
 
arc@css said:
How many generations is there with the 1851 socket? Is it the usual 2, or have Intel still not disclosed more details?
Click to expand...

Intel haven't disclosed - but the roadmap shows pretty much everything cancelled, for now, for the platform except maybe a refresh of the same line up.
 
The gaming stuff is embarrassing how they let this out like this, so you really would buy this right now and hope things get fixed ?
 
Last edited:
It’s very poor showing in terms of support. Results are all over the place. Shouldnt be touched with a stick until bugs and issues are solved, and it gets at least a 50-75$ cut.
 
DarrenM343 said:
Well it wasn't much better either on release given 2 years have passed. My first impression of productivity is that it's a step forward, just not gaming. Completely new architecture for Intel so maybe expecting everything to be improved was unlikely to be the case.
Think a fix in Windows is required too, something Intel are aware of.
Click to expand...
Completely new architecture for a dead platform, right. Windows - they managed to get windows gimped last time so maybe they can do it again (although money is tight right now)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom