vrin 2.2?? Isnt is too much ?
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
vrin 2.2?? Isnt is too much ?
i believe its supposed to be like that.Does the Cache/Uncore actually ever hit x44 (4.4GHz) when running the 4790k stock with everything set to default/auto in the BIOS? My CPU will reach 4.4GHz under load (turbo), but the Cache/Uncore only reaches 4.0GHz despite various utils showing the max cache/uncore ratio as x44.... It always seems to stop at x40!
Anyone else have this issue?
i believe its supposed to be like that.
4000mhz on cache is technically an overclock. and going above it doenst rly bring any noticable performance.
I keep my cache at 4500MHz with 1.22v(real). If i wanted to go for 4600MHz stable i would have to put 1.31v(real) which is rly not worth it.
its a overclock vs 4770k which uses the same design....I don't really understand how 4000MHz on cache is an overclock when it's also the CPUs base frequency? Everything shows my CPU cache ratio set to x44 to match the highest core ratio of x44 under load (4.4GHz turbo mode)... But the cache never reaches that (seems to max out at 4.0GHz).
Asrock have even sent me a new BIOS chip flashed with an updated version of the Intel Management Engine firmware. They also seem to think the cache/uncore should be matching the highest CPU core speed when it's running stock. I've not tried the new chip yet as I can't find my small IC extractor tool .
it depends on what u want to achieveshould i delid and replace the tim?
its a overclock vs 4770k which uses the same design....
In my bios, theres min cache ratio and max cache ratio. Check if u have both set to 44. also u can check it in cpu-z, in memory tab. Mine is permament 4500mhz
yeah. they added some resistors and some other components at the bottom of the cpu but the actual chip is (i believe) the same. They also changed the thermal paste inside thus better temps with 4790k. They also overclocked it more.....I didn't think the 4790k was exactly the same as a 4770k (looks a bit different underneath). The CPU and cache ratios are both set to x44 by default (auto mode in the BIOS), but the cache will only reach x40 under load. What happens when you run your 4790k with stock settings in the bios? Does the cache reach 4.4GHz (x44) when the CPU runs at it's 4.4GHz turbo state?
CPU-Z doesn't show anything about my cache/uncore ratio.
** No hotlinking images **
http://www.pcper.com/files/imagecache/article_max_width/review/2014-06-06/IMG_0228.JPG
yeah. they added some resistors and some other components at the bottom of the cpu but the actual chip is (i believe) the same. They also changed the thermal paste inside thus better temps with 4790k. They also overclocked it more.....
CPU-z shows ur chache under "memory" tab. look:
In bios i have:
1. core ratio: 48x (4600mhz)
2. cache MIN ratio: 45x (4500mhz)
3. cache MAX ratio: 45x (4500mhz)
Cache is always at 4500(cuz of MIN value) and never goes less..
Default setting is AUTO, which is x40 for Max value, not sure about min tho.
Thanks for the info! A few parts of CPU-Z were greyed out so I've now downloaded the latest version and can see it now .
So basically a stock 4790K will boost to 4.4GHz, but the cache will never go above 4GHz. I wonder if anyone else can confirm this with their boards too? So far i've only seen this happen with Asrock Z97 and Gigabyte Z97 boards with the CPU running stock (everything set to default/auto in the BIOS). What board are you using?
It's strange as HWinfo, IXTU and even Asrocks own A-Tuning utility will show my cache ratio as 44x (auto setting) but still the cache will only reach 4GHz under load.
Would i be right in saying going from a 4.6 2600k to one of these would be a sidegrade at most? Gaming performance seems literally insignificantly faster at best. Expected more than that 3 years after the 2600k. =/
Would i be right in saying going from a 4.6 2600k to one of these would be a sidegrade at most? Gaming performance seems literally insignificantly faster at best. Expected more than that 3 years after the 2600k. =/