Bigger = better. Always.
That's what she said....
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Bigger = better. Always.
Would i be right in saying going from a 4.6 2600k to one of these would be a sidegrade at most? Gaming performance seems literally insignificantly faster at best. Expected more than that 3 years after the 2600k. =/
This is the thing what's bugging me, my heart would love a 5820K but my brain is saying that it's not worth it.
I looked at some performance figures...
2600k 3.40ghz = 8,585
4790k 4.00ghz = 11,301
5820k 3.30ghz = 12,988
if we standardise these figures to 4.00ghz, we get...
2600k = 10,100
4790k = 11,301
5820k = 15,743
...and divide that by cores...
2600k = 2525
4790k = 2825 + 11.9% over 2600k
5820k = 2624 + 3.9% over 2600k
...there's virtually nothing in it, my upgrade itch is going to have to stay for a while.
What's the average OC of the 4790k? Mines running 4.8GHz on H100i
I'm looking at replacing my CPU and MB with a 4790k / Gigabyte bundle. My current cooler is a Corsair H60, does anyone have any experience using one of these or should I stick to the retail heatsink? Will I have any problems with it?
I'm not interested in overclocking at the moment
That is very good ViRuS2k your are at the top end with that DC