I remember picking up an SA80 at an air show, aiming at the back of a some old-guys head and furiously clicking the trigger. The nice sergeant told me that wasn't a good thing to do, and he took the gun off me, and I was banned. So the first and last time I handled a gun was when I was forty-two.
Yes that's why the best time to educate people on firearm safety is when they are young. I started when I was around 10 and safety was the number one lesson. Now 40 years later it is thoroughly ingrained, a useful tool and a real challenge to do well but like electricity treat it with due respectI remember picking up an SA80 at an air show, aiming at the back of a some old-guys head and furiously clicking the trigger. The nice sergeant told me that wasn't a good thing to do, and he took the gun off me, and I was banned. So the first and last time I handled a gun was when I was forty-two.
There is no god, and like hundreds of millions of others around the world I have no religion. Since millions manage just fine to be moral without religion, don't you think your argument is already refuted by reality? Morality has no basis in religion, and - in fact - it never really did. Religious explanations and justifications for moral values follow those values rather than preceding them. This is obvious when you look at how religious moral positions have changed over time. The mainstream view of British Christianity, for example, was that the Bible justified slavery yet almost no-one would endorse that view today.
A bit OTT from him tbh, even if loaded and cocked there'd probably have been no danger if you hadn't carried out all the jam drills.I remember picking up an SA80 at an air show, aiming at the back of a some old-guys head and furiously clicking the trigger. The nice sergeant told me that wasn't a good thing to do, and he took the gun off me, and I was banned. So the first and last time I handled a gun was when I was forty-two.
Pretty badass move
Secular societies have the same issues as religious ones. Leaders who abuse their position and power. If we really want change the system needs to prevent those kinds of people from gaining power. The hard bit is how do you do that? Buck Rogers had the answer and put the AI in chargeYou are living in a Christian built society. Religion isn't just about going to church and reading the Bible. It is a way of life. The morals of society today are based off Christianity.
By not having relogion you'd have an ideology. But unless most people bought into it wouldn't get off the ground.
From my own observations the less religion we have the more decadent society as become, to the point some don't recognise the decline.
I'm not saying religion has no problems. But as we've seen in predominantly atheist countries like China etc have killed millions more people than any religion country as done.
I don't mind admitting the religious systems aren't the perfect solution. But you seem to think atheism is despite the evidence.
In reality atheism would never naturally occur.
A basic rule of firearms use, never point it at anything you don't want to destroy. Then it doesn't matter if it's loaded or not and you can't forget or accidently shoot anyoneA bit OTT from him tbh, even if loaded and cocked there'd probably have been no danger if you hadn't carried out all the jam drills.
Bombing a civilian airport, full of civilian aircraft is badass? Why is Israel wanting to make this a region wide conflict?
Casey's video also gets to the most critical point:
I think @BowdonUK is correct overall.Secular societies have the same issues as religious ones. Leaders who abuse their position and power. If we really want change the system needs to prevent those kinds of people from gaining power. The hard bit is how do you do that? Buck Rogers had the answer and put the AI in charge![]()
September 9, 1993Yitzhak RabinPrime Minister of Israel
Mr. Prime Minister,
The signing of the Declaration of Principles marks a new era in the history of the Middle East. In firm conviction thereof, I would like to confirm the following PLO commitments:
The PLO recognizes the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security.The PLO accepts United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338.The PLO commits itself to the Middle East peace process, and to a peaceful resolution of the conflict between the two sides and declares that all outstanding issues relating to permanent status will be resolved through negotiations.
The PLO considers that the signing of the Declaration of Principles constitutes a historic event, inaugurating a new epoch of peaceful coexistence, free from violence and all other acts which endanger peace and stability. Accordingly, the PLO renounces the use of terrorism and other acts of violence and will assume responsibility over all PLO elements and personnel in order to assure their compliance, prevent violations and discipline violators.
In view of the promise of a new era and the signing of the Declaration of Principles and based on Palestinian acceptance of Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, the PLO affirms that those articles of the Palestinian Covenant which deny Israel's right to exist, and the provisions of the Covenant which are inconsistent with the commitments of this letter are now inoperative and no longer valid. Consequently, the PLO undertakes to submit to the Palestinian National Council for formal approval the necessary changes in regard to the Palestinian Covenant.
Sincerely,
Yasser ArafatChairmanThe Palestine Liberation Organization
I'm just dismayed at how much the rest of the world is backing Israel so much in this. Absolutely condone the actions of Hamas and seek to help, but allowing Israel to retaliate is just as bad.
If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing
Certainly reads like a very ballsy move. Who knows though, maybe Israel do this all the time & the Syrians are used to it/turn a blind eye.
Stopping Iran from resupplying Hamas when they know people will denounce the action as "Bombing a civilan airport, full of civilian aircraft"...is badass.Bombing a civilian airport, full of civilian aircraft is badass? Why is Israel wanting to make this a region wide conflict?
Bombing a civilian airport, full of civilian aircraft is badass? Why is Israel wanting to make this a region wide conflict?
You could ask Hamas the same question.Bombing a civilian airport, full of civilian aircraft is badass? Why is Israel wanting to make this a region wide conflict?
In 1974 the USA vetod the 2 state colution plan. The core point being Israel not being recognised as a nation state:
this changed in 1993, but since then Israel havent wanted the 2 state solution ; as the recognised plan was pre 1967 borders and they have expanded their `living space or Lebensraum since then