Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,691
- Location
- North
hj
Who mentioned anything about how the UN or Europe works. I questioned the validity of the UNs decision to hand land over from the actual natives to European Jews. In fact here is how the Israeli prime minster from the time period thought of it
How does the occupations of the people relate to a sovereign state. I'm not sure how we got from one to another. And for arguments sake is the natives claim lessened because they are not a sovereign state, when the people moving in are Europeans?
No I don't call people who grow crops, work in the textile industry, raise livestock etc "goat herders"
I call goat herders "goat herders"
It's a point you have been making, please answer. Why do you think there occupation lessens their valid claims to the land.
Lol, so it's might is right for you? So you probably also support Russia in Ukraine and any other technologically superior country when they invade other countries? What a silly line of rationale, are you living in the 12th century? Interesting you have gone from the Jews had a valid claim to the land decided by the UN to the Palestinians were goat herders and couldn't defend themselves, so tough...data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
Actually "intelligence" was apt considering you brought up Nobel Prizes as a counter to "if you think Muslims are stupid villagers." To which you answered they have only won 2 Nobel Prices, which again is not true as the number is significantly greater than that so you started out on a lie. As I have demonstrated Nobel prizes do not reflect the intellect based off ethnicity or religious make up and is ridiculous to suggest otherwise. looking at the list of nations with Nobel Prizes per Capita there are many nations towards the lower end of the scale who have what most would accept to be intelligent nations. Not to even mentions a massive number of other factors, but I guess you like to simply things to get across irrational and biased points (proven by the fact you have papers on such)
"S.Korea just lacks interaction" what does that meandata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
Do you know what sarcasm is? I think the term your looking for is "stereotype"
Well that's not how the UN (or Europe) works.
Who mentioned anything about how the UN or Europe works. I questioned the validity of the UNs decision to hand land over from the actual natives to European Jews. In fact here is how the Israeli prime minster from the time period thought of it
"If I were an Arab leader, I would never sign an agreement with Israel. It is normal; we have taken their country. It is true God promised it to us, but how could that interest them? Our God is not theirs. There has been Anti - Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault ? They see but one thing: we have come and we have stolen their country. Why would they accept that?" David Ben Gurion
That these were just native peoples, not a sovereign state?
How does the occupations of the people relate to a sovereign state. I'm not sure how we got from one to another. And for arguments sake is the natives claim lessened because they are not a sovereign state, when the people moving in are Europeans?
I think you are being pointlessly literal here, when describing a peasant population do you list every peasant trade with which they occupy themselves, or do you just call them peasants (or goat herders, or wheat growers or whatever)
No I don't call people who grow crops, work in the textile industry, raise livestock etc "goat herders"
I call goat herders "goat herders"
Ask yourself, you keep asking it?
It's a point you have been making, please answer. Why do you think there occupation lessens their valid claims to the land.
It's relevant because once again their fate had been decided by technologically superior countries just as it had been when they were ruled by the Ottoman empire. Peasants don't get to decide who they are ruled by, they just get ruled.
Lol, so it's might is right for you? So you probably also support Russia in Ukraine and any other technologically superior country when they invade other countries? What a silly line of rationale, are you living in the 12th century? Interesting you have gone from the Jews had a valid claim to the land decided by the UN to the Palestinians were goat herders and couldn't defend themselves, so tough...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
The lack of Nobels can be traced back to Islamic society, nobody wants to work in a repressive environment, so unless they can escape to the west, nothing of note is done. S.Korea just lacks interaction. I've got a nice paper on this somewhere.
Intelligence was your wording, I'm putting it down as a side effect of your culture.
Actually "intelligence" was apt considering you brought up Nobel Prizes as a counter to "if you think Muslims are stupid villagers." To which you answered they have only won 2 Nobel Prices, which again is not true as the number is significantly greater than that so you started out on a lie. As I have demonstrated Nobel prizes do not reflect the intellect based off ethnicity or religious make up and is ridiculous to suggest otherwise. looking at the list of nations with Nobel Prizes per Capita there are many nations towards the lower end of the scale who have what most would accept to be intelligent nations. Not to even mentions a massive number of other factors, but I guess you like to simply things to get across irrational and biased points (proven by the fact you have papers on such)
"S.Korea just lacks interaction" what does that mean
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
Last point, sarcasm?
Do you know what sarcasm is? I think the term your looking for is "stereotype"
Last edited: