Bearing in mind that I completely agree we could probably do with a solid, fearsome defensive mid, now that Song has decided he is the next Messi, I love how you continue to complain about our lack of wingers, as though a team that's scored 55 times in 22 games is having trouble with their attacking.
Would you care to explain where one has anything to do with the other? I mean, really, firstly did I say we had trouble attacking, no I didn't, I said we had no wingers, can you see how that arrangement of different words doesn't mean the same thing?
Secondly, scoring 55 times in 22 games is all well and good, but..... hmmm, other teams have scored more goals, and those teams are ahead of us........
Are you suggesting because we've scored goals, at whatever rate we've scored them(slower than last year of course when we won..... hmm, can't seem to remember the name of those cups we won last year), we can't improve and score more goals, and do better, I mean is that really what you're trying to suggest, because if it is, some people might just consider that to be a rather moronic thing to say.
Anyway, thats before we get to our performances against say the top 6, where, we lose, slower guys without that killer pace might still get you goals against less good teams, but a better out and out winger, with that real pace(and ability to pass, cross, shoot and not be a big girl which obviously rules Theo out) might be the difference between say, Chelsea spanking us, and us scoring a few more against the best teams and getting some points.
We've scored 32, in 15 in the league, and we're 3rd, do you think had we scored more, with better players, in a year Utd/Chelsea have thrown away a tonne of points, we might not be leading the league? No, you're right, we don't want to score MORE goals, what a ridiculous idea
![Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/rolleyes.gif)
unfortunately those rolleyes don't look nearly sarcastic enough with the xmas hat on to express what a truly epically stupid thing you are saying is. More goals, bad I'll remember to bring that up in every relevant and non relevant situation in the future as you like to do to everyone else.
Arsenal lose 2-3 to Spurs, but Weebull says, more goals, bad.
By the way, Bolton have scored 4 whole goals less than us, and are a not insignificant 6 points behind us, a few extra goals goes a LONG way. Better players, more goals, more wins, more points, less never winning anything all to me seems like a good idea, crazy little me.