** January Transfer Window 2011/12 Season Rumours/Signings **

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah I see so because Lucas failed as a Gerrard replacement when Henderson fails like wise he'll also be made into a defensive midfielder I get ya now :D :p

Right, and who would be a Gerrard (2007-2009) replacement? :p

I honestly feel Henderson can develop into 'that type' of player, but we are gonna be waiting a very long time for another Gerrard.


It was Rafa's system which placed Lucas as a DM. He tended to be on for either Alonso or Mach as one of two holding mids. Despite that not being his position and getting stick for a number of years, he has made it his own now. this is because the guy is a top class footballer, not because he was bad at attacking.

This too, he's perfectly capable higher up the pitch and being creative, his pass through to Stevie against Newcastle 2008 (i think?) was sublime.
 
The reality is that we don't and never needed outside investment, what we needed was the club to be run properly. Which is starting to happen..

What's the operating profit at Liverpool each year now then without any investment from someone with a big wallet?

I honestly don't know, the last time I looked when you were being run properly was when you had 1 million profit at the end of the season. The year Carlisle made the same while just avoiding going out the football league.

I think just about everyone must need outside investment the way players wages have gone and signing fees, well to manage to compete genuinely with the top 4 anyway :(
 
The reality is that we don't and never needed outside investment, what we needed was the club to be run properly. Which is starting to happen.

During Rick Parry's time at Liverpool (and even before that) we were run like a corner shop. Rick Parry handled everything from renewing players contracts to negotiating and signing all the commercial deals. We were the last Premier League club (at the time) to open an official store and not only were we selling ourselves short in regards to our commercial deals; going into the 2005 CL final, we didn't have a shirt sponsor lined up for the following season. It was only at the last minute that Carlsberg agreed to renew the deal and pay us £3.5m per year (which eventually rose to ~£7m). Because of that delay Reebok withheld money from our kit deal as they claimed the deal cost them money (we eventually got the money after taking Reebok to court).

The one good thing from Hicks and Gillett's time at Liverpool was the appointment of Ian Ayre as commerical director. Under him our shirt sponsorship deal has rose from £7m to just over £20m (as well as several other smaller deals) and our kit deal has gone from being worth £12m to possibly as much as £50m. If only David Moores had appointed somebody like Ayre, we'd have been in our new ground 10 years ago and it would have cost a fraction of what it's likely to cost.

Liverpool is the 4th largest seller of kits in the world, behind Barca, Real and Man U. This is after years of mediocrity and poor marketing. If we had commercialised at the same time as Man U rather than waiting till the last couple of years it is very likely that Liverpool would be a much stronger club than at present. Question is whether we have left it too late :confused:
 
Liverpool is the 4th largest seller of kits in the world, behind Barca, Real and Man U. This is after years of mediocrity and poor marketing. If we had commercialised at the same time as Man U rather than waiting till the last couple of years it is very likely that Liverpool would be a much stronger club than at present. Question is whether we have left it too late :confused:

Too late really, because no amount of commercial revenue is a match for oil money unfortunately.
 
What's the operating profit at Liverpool each year now then without any investment from someone with a big wallet?

I honestly don't know, the last time I looked when you were being run properly was when you had 1 million profit at the end of the season. The year Carlisle made the same while just avoiding going out the football league.

I think just about everyone must need outside investment the way players wages have gone and signing fees, well to manage to compete genuinely with the top 4 anyway :(

Im sure Baz will find the proper figures, but it was estimated that with our 'old' deals circa 2008, without the debt we would have had about £30m to spend on fees + wages from our own backs alone.

So now? no idea, but its surely more.


Too late really, because no amount of commercial revenue is a match for oil money unfortunately.

Ah but Oil will be drying up before our fan base does ;)
 
What's the operating profit at Liverpool each year now then without any investment from someone with a big wallet?

I honestly don't know, the last time I looked when you were being run properly was when you had 1 million profit at the end of the season. The year Carlisle made the same while just avoiding going out the football league.

I think just about everyone must need outside investment the way players wages have gone and signing fees, well to manage to compete genuinely with the top 4 anyway :(

The last time you looked when we were being run properly? That's not happened in my life time.

Commerically we were run terribly under Moores and Parry, that began to change under H&G but was more than offset by interest payments and bank fees though. The debt's now gone and commercially we're still growing, however a decent chunk of that will be cancelled out by the loss of CL football.

With all the changes that's have and are still happening, I couldn't even give you much of a guess as to what sort of profit we're making now. However we're more than comfortable even without CL football.

And as a general point, football clubs shouldn't make profits. They should hold reasonable cash reserves and whatever they make beyond that should be reinvested into the club.
 
This too, he's perfectly capable higher up the pitch and being creative, his pass through to Stevie against Newcastle 2008 (i think?) was sublime.

You wont find another Gerrard, he was the last of that type of player.

As for Lucas one good pass doesn't make him creative, you're probably only remembering that one because it's the only one he's done :p

He's certainly not an outstanding footballer though, he's a very good defensive midfielder and that's it.
 
You wont find another Gerrard, he was the last of that type of player.

As for Lucas one good pass doesn't make him creative, you're probably only remembering that one because it's the only one he's done :p

He's certainly not an outstanding footballer though, he's a very good defensive midfielder and that's it.

Lucas has gradually become and outstanding footballer. He's slowly but surely got better and better and at the time of his injury he was playing as well (albeit differently) as either Alonso or Mascherano ever played for us.

His performances in the Chelsea-City-Chelsea games we had were nothing short of outstanding; he bossed the midfield in all 3 games and dare I say it, he was beginning to ping the ball around like Alonso did. The only thing he's lacked is goals and the way he was progressing, I wouldn't have been surprised to see him address that too.
 
Lucas has gradually become and outstanding footballer. He's slowly but surely got better and better and at the time of his injury he was playing as well (albeit differently) as either Alonso or Mascherano ever played for us.

His performances in the Chelsea-City-Chelsea games we had were nothing short of outstanding; he bossed the midfield in all 3 games and dare I say it, he was beginning to ping the ball around like Alonso did. The only thing he's lacked is goals and the way he was progressing, I wouldn't have been surprised to see him address that too.

Or in other words, he was doing everything Charlie Adam should be doing, but is incapable. :(
 
Lucas has gradually become and outstanding footballer. He's slowly but surely got better and better and at the time of his injury he was playing as well (albeit differently) as either Alonso or Mascherano ever played for us.

His performances in the Chelsea-City-Chelsea games we had were nothing short of outstanding; he bossed the midfield in all 3 games and dare I say it, he was beginning to ping the ball around like Alonso did. The only thing he's lacked is goals and the way he was progressing, I wouldn't have been surprised to see him address that too.

1 goal in 123 league games and you really believe he was going to address that? What was it you said to Biz yesterday about blind loyalty? ;)

Lucas is a limited footballer who to give credit is very good at what he does, he'll never have the passing range or technical ability of an Alonso so no he's not an outstanding footballer. In terms of being a defensive midfielder I'd place him at the same level as De Jong of last season, by definition would you call De Jong an outstanding footballer? I wouldn't.
 
Bily is off to Spartak Moscow for 7m Euros according to Russian Sky Sports look-a-like website!


edit--->


But ITV football have just tweeted saying it's only £2m... :confused: Maybe they mean a £2m hit on the price and who ever has tweeted it has just got it wrong. :D
 
Last edited:
Too late really, because no amount of commercial revenue is a match for oil money unfortunately.

If (and that is a big if) financial fair play eventually works how it should, there will be an end to football clubs running as if they have put an infinite cash cheat on. If that happens then it will only be a few seasons before the oil money owners get bored and move on.
 
1 goal in 123 league games and you really believe he was going to address that? What was it you said to Biz yesterday about blind loyalty? ;)

Lucas is a limited footballer who to give credit is very good at what he does, he'll never have the passing range or technical ability of an Alonso so no he's not an outstanding footballer. In terms of being a defensive midfielder I'd place him at the same level as De Jong of last season, by definition would you call De Jong an outstanding footballer? I wouldn't.

It's nothing to do with loyalty. Like a lot of Liverpool fans I've heavily criticised Lucas in the past and looking back on it, it was ridiculous to do so. He was a kid when he was brought in and when he played, he was replacing one of Gerrard, Mascherano or Alonso. He was being compared with 3 of the best CM's in the world at the time, while settling into a completely new club, country and culture.

As for limited/outstanding footballer; there's 2 issues here. Firstly I disagree that Lucas is limited. He probably can't pass the ball as well as Alonso but very few can, the way he was playing prior to his injury though, he wasn't that far behind. Defensively he may well be on a par with De Jong of last year but Lucas is far better on the ball than De Jong is. Check out Lucas's passing stats from this season; not only were his pass completion stats excellent, a high % of his passes were forward passes too. As I said, it's been a gradual progression. The first thing he done was improve his defensive side of the game and became a competent player for us. He's since got better and better and he's grown in confidence. It as only in the last couple of months before his injury that he started hitting the 40-50 yard passes. He's developed into an excellet player.

And secondly, it appears that you believe that non-creative players can't be outstanding footballers. I disagree again. Makelele was an outstanding player as have several others of his type.
 
Last edited:
And secondly, it appears that you believe that non-creative players can't be outstanding footballers. I disagree again. Makelele was an outstanding player as have several others of his type.

Personally I'd never call Reina an outstanding footballer, he's a bloody good keeper though. I'd never call Vidic and outstanding footballer either, but I would say he's one of the best defenders in the world, if by that definition it's your opinion that makes them both outstanding footballers then fair enough either way though Lucas doesn't fall into the same argument anyway (he's certainly no where near the class of your example Makelele)
 
While I watch Liverpool I can't say I've watced Lucas specifically but I've not noticed Lucas be particularly good, keep this in mind, Arsenal fans HATED Song as LIverpool fans hated Lucas. Now most Arsenal fans love song as Liverpool fans now love Lucas.

Song hasn't improved a jot, he's still a poor passer, slow, crap at getting forward and horrific defensively...... yet rated by many at Arsenal and outside of Arsenal as the best DM in the league.

Yet when asked what exactly it is he does so well, and pointed out the many many mistakes he makes I never get an answer of what he does well.

Essentially has Lucas improved that much, or did your expectations completely change, or have you spent so long with a crap DM that when he improved slightly, or quite possibly as with Arsenal other players help compensate, you just think he's improved?

I mean at Arsenal, apparently ignored by the vast majority, Nasri as far back as 3 years ago spent 3-4 games playing behind Song to cover his ass, Fabregas I remember got injured against Liverpool a few years ago and up till that point he had both played excellently, spent most of the game deeper than Song and was doing a huge amount of defensive work(while also getting forward and helping attack far more and far better than Song). Last season Wilshire spent the entire season as the DM to cover for Song, who wasn't even close to average offensively yet required sacrificing a great attacking player to cover him in defence. This year its Arteta doing it.

Is Lucas better, did your expectations change, or has the rest of the team who before Lucas left the work to Mascherano/Alonso, now make up for Lucas and help make him look good.

It's surprising how the same player can be viewed entirely differently by an entire fanbase of players over a couple years when they've played the same way the whole time.

I mean, Walcott, Sven put him in the england team, Capello still picks him, Wenger won't drop him, the fans loved him last year, think he's a joke this year...... Walcott hasn't changed the way he actually plays at all in 5 years, identical player to the one we bought, useless.

As to the last point, non creative players can be good, but you don't have to give up half your game to be good at another, the best players are simply great footballers who have no weak part to their game.

Again I'll mention Gilberto, as comfortable taking a penalty and scoring 12 in his best season for us, as being the best defensive midfielder in the world. Great passing forwards, or defending, great tackler, great intercepter, great vision, helped both get us on a counter attack by getting the ball out of trouble and forwards quickly and fine running forwards supporting a counter attack and getting the goal if required.

I mean, Liverpool's defence without caragher has improved a lot....... the team is conceding less.... Lucas wasn't the main change the defence was, but you're thinking Lucas has improved dramatically?

Walcott, last year he got a quite ridiculous number of goals and assists(and still really very low for a "top " player) and the fans loved him, the fact that he was horrific for 85mins of every game, and got a hattrick against a woeful team and a few lucky goals here and there turned the opinion from 85mins of waste to really great year. This season he hasn't gotten as lucky, played absolutely identically....... and the fans think he's a joke.

This is my problem with fans, get a goal, no one cares and opinion is entirely different, defence stops conceding........ DM must be doing great. It's the performance, that all I've ever focused on, crap for 89 mins, team lose, Walcott doesn't score, has 5 shots, misses with all, another game crap for 89 mins, Walcott scores, 5 shots, one fluky goal, team loses..... one performance would have Arsenal fans happy and the other would have them crying for a new signing...... for the same performance.
 
Last edited:
Essentially has Lucas improved that much, or did your expectations completely change, or have you spent so long with a crap DM that when he improved slightly, or quite possibly as with Arsenal other players help compensate, you just think he's improved?

He's improved dramatically.
Positionally he's in the right place 99% of the time now, where-as before he was a bit all over the place, and often had to make last-ditch challenges (and thus give silly FK's away)

Passing accuracy has improved from 70 odd % to high 80's, and %'age passes forward has gone up too.

1 on 1 challenges he used to get bullied off the ball, now he wins nearly all of his 1 on 1's in the air or on the ground.

etc etc.
Stats don't prove everything in football, but in this case they clearly show he has matured and improved dramatically.

Play him there instead of Adams then :p

It would probably improve us, at least Reina's long range passing radar is still functioning, Adam thinks our players are in row Z lately.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom