Rooney needlessly kicking an opponant didn't do any harm either, in fact it's rare to see someone showing passion if they are wearing three lions.
Oh come on! Not passion...thuggery
Rooney needlessly kicking an opponant didn't do any harm either, in fact it's rare to see someone showing passion if they are wearing three lions.
the ponit your missing is 'off field problems'
you don't think it's counter productive to **** your best mates girlfriend?
you don't think it's poor form to call your England teammates brother a black ****? that one actually happened 'on the pitch'
I see you left out Gerrard punching people in night clubs, do you support liverpool by any chance![]()
Rooney needlessly kicking an opponant didn't do any harm either, in fact it's rare to see someone showing passion if they are wearing three lions.
That exact same comment could be levelled at JT. He's a better leader than those two and he is being judged solely on off-field misdeameanours.
Paul Scholes, LOL.
Jebus.
he called an opposing player a '****ing black ****' on the pitch.
he shagged his best mates gf who happened to be a teammate.
Rooney and Gerrard both have worse on their record.
People are actually touting media adverse Scholes?! And Rooney? Seriously?
I think the captain should be:
a) respected within the squad/a leader.
b) a respectable role model.
No he doesn't.
Assault was dropped but I thought he was guilty of affray?
Nope. He was found not guilty.
The right decision.
In the work place, you normally find your self in a position of guilty until proved innocent. This is same for school teachers, banker etc you are removed until tribunal or trial and I see his position no different from any other.
People are actually touting media adverse Scholes?! And Rooney? Seriously?
I think the captain should be:
a) respected within the squad/a leader.
b) a respectable role model.
I think it's a load of rubbish when people say that off-the-field discretions shouldn't matter - it's just ridiculous. They should be role models, that should be our first concern... not that refusing to pick them may harm our chances of winning. It's why I massively respect the way the England rugby team remove from their squads players who get done for drink driving, etc (Danny Care).
I didn't miss any point. You claimed that Gerrard (even though he was cleared) and Rooney's issues were off-field but that Terry's issues have affected performances on-field. So I'll ask you again, what affects have Terry's misdemenours had on the pitch? Has either Terry's or the side as a whole's performances dropped since either the Bridge or Ferdinand incidents?
And Rooney getting himself sent off because he can't control his temper doesn't do any harm?![]()
![]()
Retracted then
I still don't see the point of installing him as captain, mind. Though he'd be clear 2nd choice, how much longer will he be around?
Rooney got sent off yes, did it affect the result of the game?
As I asked Tom earlier, why appoint a long term captain now. Lets say you picked Hart, who's to say that when the next manager takes over in the summer they won't want somebody else?
With Capello leaving after the Euros, I think it only makes sense to select the best possible captain for the short term and then address the long term issue after. And imo, Gerrard's the outstanding candidate for the short term.
Did he? Has that been proven?
Wasn't it his ex? Wasn't the team mate already at another club?
If you judge people by off-field stuff then do so. Don't have one rule for one and one rule for another. Rooney and Gerrard both have worse on their record.
it doesn't have to be proven, people with a pair of eyes can see what he calls him.
gf/ex does it matter, the fact remains he shagged the Mother of Bridge's children whilst being his best friend, in the same position would you claim that it didn't affect your relationship with that friend? for instance, it happens in your place of work and every couple of months you have to meet up with other people in your field and 'work together' would you be able to sit in the same office and be chummy with him?