But what makes me wonder is that you Neil seem hard done by...
Why do you keep saying this? Huh!
However, my points thusfar (which you keep ignoring of course) have been as follows:-
Chance of believing
Clearly where you are born, or when you are born, has a statistical impact on your likelyhood to believe. Look at the percentage of believers per country and you'll see the figure vary a lot!
Now add to this, that according to time, this percentage will change too.
The meaning is -
as you keep having problems understanding it - that where and when you are born has a statistical bearing on your likelyhood to end up believing in God.
Yes, everyone has a chance in believing or not, but some have more of a chance. No denying it
Chance of sinning
The same suggestion can be made on one likelihood to sin. Some people born had a nigh on 100% chance of terrible sinning in the worse case. Bit unlucky to be born into shoes that undoubtably will mean you are a murderer through no real choice.
Don't even have to take the test
Some people don't even have to pass the test, instead jumping to the front of the queue straight into heaven. Children who die young? Mentally ill?
What does it all mean?
Clearly the traditional view of religion, where life is a test, seems to have a serious problem. The test just isn't fair when viewed through traditional religious standards.
Born in the wrong country? You have less of a chance of believing, so less of a chance of going to heaven.
Die at 3yrs old? No worries... Go straight to heaven.
And now it seem, not only is this lop-sided test used to see who qualifies for heaven, but also what seat you get there too!
I'm sorry, it's sounding more contrived and ridiculous by the second...