Because it requires buying a 2nd switch, which just hasn't been a priority. It already went to Nintendo before who claimed its fine after a "soak test"Why didn't you sort that out ages ago?
Because it requires buying a 2nd switch, which just hasn't been a priority. It already went to Nintendo before who claimed its fine after a "soak test"Why didn't you sort that out ages ago?
So your new solution is to buy a second switch?Because it requires buying a 2nd switch, which just hasn't been a priority. It already went to Nintendo before who claimed its fine after a "soak test"
Do people really feel the need for a higher res screen?
Honestly I think the screen as it is is perfect. Plus a higher res screen means more powe required to push th pixels, and ultimately struggles to improve battery time as well.
So your new solution is to buy a second switch?![]()
I almost bought one today but opted for a One S. This news would have annoyed me if I've had gone the other way.
Screen is plenty good enough in my opinion. If Nintendo are looking for somewhere to spend money there are a lot of things I would do before making new hardware.
Ah but this is Nintendo, they love charging £40 for games that are £5 on everything else, keep milking that money cow. As much as I love Nintendo the new Switch will have to be something much better to warrant the upgrade for me. Knowing them it'll probably be a cheap upgrade on their part and a expensive one on ours![]()
Nintendo don't set the prices.
It can't be that much more demanding porting a game from to one platform from the rest.
Are the Wii U ports on the Switch even that different? Having played a few Wii U games lately that are on the Switch, I just don't see a huge difference.