35 - 46 FPS at 1440P
When Nvidia say 2X as fast as consoles what they mean is with DLSS3 Frame Gen.
Look, Nvidia are selling cards that are weak in performance, the RX 7600 beats it quite a lot of the time, for a high price because DLSS is supposed to make up the rest of the performance, yes we have got to the stage now where DLSS is part of the performance metric of the product and its price is calculated based on that.
Congratulations, we turned Nvidia in to something worse than Apple.
People like Hardware Unboxed are doing an ok job of being critical of Nvidia, they do try, but they keep making the same mistakes, they keep arguing that AMD should be priced less than the value Nvidia put on DLSS, this is why they are not happy with a GPU that's 30% faster than the EOL card its replaced while also 20% cheaper.
In any reasonable world that is good, but because HUB seem to be valuing DLSS at about 1/3 of the value of Nvidia GPU's, so if its $300 then the equivalent AMD GPU should be $200.
This is a childs logic, a child who has no understanding of what the concept of money actually is, someone who doesn't understand that for AMD to get a product to market it costs them money, so if they sell a product for $200 that's not $200 in their pocket.
Its in this way that even those critical of Nvidia are still justifying a monetary value on DLSS, and quite a high one, so even Nvidia themselves are like "well hang on a minute, you keep telling people to buy our cards because AMD don't have DLSS so you agree it has added value" and Nvidia are not wrong. They do agree.