Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,801
This one is a solid option imo, £589.99 Really good cooling, 3yr UK-based warranty and a 12pin connector for added Power LimitGigabyte Gaming OC
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
This one is a solid option imo, £589.99 Really good cooling, 3yr UK-based warranty and a 12pin connector for added Power LimitGigabyte Gaming OC
This one is a solid option imo, £589.99 Really good cooling, 3yr UK-based warranty and a 12pin connector for added Power Limit
I am, thanks for clarifying!!! I'd prob go for the Windforce OC then.The Gigabyte Gaming OC is not £589 that is the Gigabyte WindForce OC which is a totally different card and has an 8-pin connector.
The Asus Dual and Gigabyte Windforce have a metal backplate. The Gainward Ghost, MSI Ventus and Palit Dual are definitely plastic.Anyone know if any of the MSRP cards have a metal back plate? I think maybe the Asus?
Yeah, I think I saw a review (LTT?) where they said that the 4070 was sort of targeted by Nvidia as a 1080 replacement more than a 3080 replacement. People are just expecting the same generational improvements that we've had in the past.I just ordered the ASUS dual, had decent cooling/noise levels from the tpu review, current card is gtx 1660,
I think those complaining already have good gpu's and are disappointed by the generational upgrade, those of us with older slower cards see it as getting a rtx3080 style speed for 100w less power draw, smaller form factor, and lower msrp.
I would personally just buy the cheapest card available, if your contemplating spending near £700 then buy a 4070Ti or a 7900 XT for the little extra it cost for a solid 20% performance boost.
As someone with a 4k 144hz monitor I badly want too. but no card can really hit that 144fps constant yet not even the 4090. You are right though I do need to get off, but at the moment i've been going through some of my older Steam games as i've probably bought under 10 games in the last 3 years (not including the odd humble bundle month i forgot to pause) so it's more of a want than a need. As soon as a blinding single player RPG comes out that I really want I might jump the prices are about where I want them to be for last gen cards now, but I just need something to push me.
IDK what you are playing, but I have a 165hz monitor and my overclocked 6800XT is more than enough in competitive games. By competitive I mean Esports, because you only need that sort of response time in titles like that. For absolutely everything else 60 FPS minimum is more than enough.
I am just catching up, but what has been said about power use on the 6950xt is sort of true. The fact is that it is much faster than the 4070, and thus if you power managed it to 200w it would probably still be about the same or faster and deliver the same performance.
Fill ya boots...Hoping some madlad does a comparison of all the available 4070s.
Most of the benches I’ve seen of the OC cards show the FE beating it which is weird as the FE has a lower boost clock.
I really want to find out which card is the coolest/quietest and ideally with a factory OC that offers a decent boost over the FE/reference models.
Debating buying a 4070 as for my 1440p games it will be sufficient and access to dlss 3.0 is a bonus for me.
As they say, there are no bad GPUs, only bad pricesLoving my 4070 FE Vs 3060ti, now I can run RE4 4k maxed with 90+ FPS, no FSR required.
Got my 4070 ASUS Dual, i can confirm the backplate is metal, runs extremely quiet , could barely hear the fans with the side of case off at 1200rpm. Temps good too havent seen anything over 64C yet. ( 20C room temp )
power draw seems to top at 190W roughly,
performance for the price isnt great, as we know, was slightly disappointed with performance given the £589 price, at £400-£450 would have been good value. Still a good upgrade from my gtx 1660,
It would have almost zero impact, since Ebay prices are in a world of their own. 3080s and 3080 Tis are still going for £500-700 on there, and that's looking at sold ones since the 4070 came out, not fanciful BIN listings. A 3080 FE sold for £635 earlier. The most recent sale was a 3080 with a busted DisplayPort, and even that fetched £493.Hypothetical: if a 4070 was less how would that impact the used market? For those who have GPUs with some value today, maybe the marginal upgrade cost isn't that much different than if the 4070 was less because the 4070 being less would also negatively impact the resale value of your existing card.