- Joined
- 2 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 710
Chandler_90 said:Well I've bought the 0609 chip.. cost me ~£240.
Hope it clocks well
is that a 165, 170 or 175?
Agent
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Chandler_90 said:Well I've bought the 0609 chip.. cost me ~£240.
Hope it clocks well
YooEntSinMeROYT said:Seems to. I dropped back down to 200HTT & still doing the same thing.
It only seems to be when choosing blend on the torture test options. One core seems to be occupied but the other does not get stressed (when looking at the process in task manager). If I choose small or large FFTs then it seems to run OK maximising both cores.
What do most people select? Blend?
Agent WD40 said:is that a 165, 170 or 175?
Agent
spookywillow said:i have this problem too and i think its because both cores are trying to access the memory to test it, set it to test the cpu only and both instances run perfect and pass many tests in the same time frame.
im sure you can specify the amount of ram each core uses so try doing that and give each core an equal amount of ram to work with.
smids said:I just run Large FTT's on default settings. That's good enough for me. Small FTT's is worthless as it doesn't always show instability between the CPU and memory etc i.e. the memory controller.
w3bbo said:Np m8.
The phoenix bios is a little different to the AMI Asus use but its all pretty much straightforward if you are used to playing with the bios which you seem to be.
Agent WD40 said:Hi W3bbo.
Wow! I love this new Board!! I'm so glad I changed. But I am completely confused with the BIOS and mainly the RAM timings! I'm going to need a lot of help from the guys over at the DFI forums.
But just wanted to say thanks for the advice. I had a few problems with geting the RAID0 set working, Ihad to usre the sil raid and not the nvRAID ( )
I've got every thing back to 2.8ghz and I get a very good feeling that I can push it even further. I really think that with this board its looking all go for 3ghz!
Agent.
P.S. MBM5 is WAY out on the temp readings. Its suggesting at 2.8ghz on full load i'm doing about 35C. LMAO.
w3bbo said:Very nice clock there m8. Just a couple of things though, download the latest version of CPU-Z (looks like you are using an older version). Also keep and eye on that chipset temp. 57c isn't a major concern but it is still pretty high, maybe increase the airflow in your case? Have you tried running your memory on a lower divider? Blend failure suggests a problem with memory and becuase large FFT has passed you obviously have a good memory controller.
Wish I could get my 170 stable @ 3 gig, most I can do is an hour or so (sa far!) regardless of what test or timings I use.
w3bbo said:1.49v
w3bbo said:Very nice clock there m8. Just a couple of things though, download the latest version of CPU-Z (looks like you are using an older version). Also keep and eye on that chipset temp. 57c isn't a major concern but it is still pretty high, maybe increase the airflow in your case? Have you tried running your memory on a lower divider? Blend failure suggests a problem with memory and becuase large FFT has passed you obviously have a good memory controller.
Wish I could get my 170 stable @ 3 gig, most I can do is an hour or so (sa far!) regardless of what test or timings I use.
Artheas said:I just started trying to overclock my Opteron 170 today.
I'm getting to 2.5GHz on air, 41 degrees under load, max for default voltages.
Now i'm upping the voltage to see how high it can go, but i'm noticing something odd about the VCore voltage. WHen it was at 1.35 (default), the readings idled at about 1.375V. Now that i've upped it to 1.4V, it idles at 1.42V, and goes up to 1.44 under load. Is this something i should worry about?