• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Official Ryzen Owners Thread ***

Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,887
Location
United Kingdom
@AMDMatt Would be interested in seeing your new results from handbrake test:


Here are my results:

[19:03:50] sync: framerate min 23.981 fps, max 23.981 fps, avg 23.976 fps
x265 [info]: frame I: 9, Avg QP:20.47 kb/s: 35577.24
x265 [info]: frame P: 487, Avg QP:22.67 kb/s: 9896.55
x265 [info]: frame B: 1001, Avg QP:28.03 kb/s: 901.21
x265 [info]: Weighted P-Frames: Y:3.9% UV:1.2%
x265 [info]: consecutive B-frames: 26.4% 9.1% 11.5% 42.3% 10.7%
encoded 1497 frames in 125.32s (11.95 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
[19:03:50] mux: track 0, 1497 frames, 31505829 bytes, 4026.03 kbps, fifo 1024
[19:03:50] mux: track 1, 2933 frames, 1252808 bytes, 160.09 kbps, fifo 2048
[19:03:50] libhb: work result = 0

# Encode Completed ...

My results are almost identical.

[19:28:30] sync: framerate min 23.974 fps, max 23.981 fps, avg 23.976 fps
x265 [info]: frame I: 9, Avg QP:20.47 kb/s: 35577.24
x265 [info]: frame P: 487, Avg QP:22.67 kb/s: 9896.55
x265 [info]: frame B: 1001, Avg QP:28.03 kb/s: 901.21
x265 [info]: Weighted P-Frames: Y:3.9% UV:1.2%
x265 [info]: consecutive B-frames: 26.4% 9.1% 11.5% 42.3% 10.7%
encoded 1497 frames in 120.24s (12.45 fps), 4036.02 kb/s, Avg QP:26.24
[19:28:30] mux: track 0, 1497 frames, 31505829 bytes, 4026.03 kbps, fifo 1024
[19:28:30] mux: track 1, 2933 frames, 1252808 bytes, 160.09 kbps, fifo 2048
[19:28:30] libhb: work result = 0

# Encode Completed ...
 
Permabanned
Joined
15 May 2006
Posts
4,107
Location
London
Temperature Reporting
The primary temperature reporting sensor of the AMD Ryzen™ processor is a sensor called “T Control,” or tCTL for short. The tCTL sensor is derived from the junction (Tj) temperature—the interface point between the die and heatspreader—but it may be offset on certain CPU models so that all models on the AM4 Platform have the same maximum tCTL value. This approach ensures that all AMD Ryzen™ processors have a consistent fan policy.



Specifically, the AMD Ryzen™ 7 1700X and 1800X carry a +20°C offset between the tCTL° (reported) temperature and the actual Tj° temperature. In the short term, users of the AMD Ryzen™ 1700X and 1800X can simply subtract 20°C to determine the true junction temperature of their processor. No arithmetic is required for the Ryzen 7 1700. Long term, we expect temperature monitoring software to better understand our tCTL offsets to report the junction temperature automatically.



The table below serves as an example of how the tCTL sensor can be interpreted in a hypothetical scenario where a Ryzen processor is operating at 38°C.

So what is the real temp of my CPU?
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
20C less than reported for 1700X/1800X, apparently.

I don't really understand why it's been done though? are 1700X/1800X allowed to run 20C hotter?
 
Last edited:
Permabanned
Joined
15 May 2006
Posts
4,107
Location
London
20C less than reported for 1700X/1800X, apparently.

I don't really understand why it's been done though? are 1700X/1800X allowed to run 20C hotter?
CPU (Tctl) is reporting 39.8C, my Kraken says liquid Temp is 29.9C, so going by AMD maths the real temp of my CPU should be 19.8C? Thats nuts it. Even though my krakens block is very cold to the touch.
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
What are you using to monitor? it might be that it already has the offset taken into account. I'm trying to figure out why 1700X/1800X need a +20C offset for the fan policy to be consistent, maybe it is due to the different stock fans? :confused:
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
It says tCTL is offset so that all models have the same maximum tCTL value so that must mean 1700X/1800X need to run 20C cooler? less heat tolerance due to higher clocks?
 
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,103
Opened the Ryzen system I built on Friday back up to install a F12 on the D15 (second stock fan doesn't fit due to no low profile DDR4 existing), figured somebody somewhere may like to see it /shrug.




20C less than reported for 1700X/1800X, apparently.
Is it possible motherboard manufacturers can work around this, I.E when I flashed my GB gaming 5 from stock BIOS to latest beta BIOS I was sure it dropped CPU temp by ~20c but thought I imagined it lol.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
30 Mar 2004
Posts
9,732
Location
London
Opened the Ryzen system I built on Friday back up to install a F12 on the D15 (second stock fan doesn't fit due to no low profile DDR4 existing), figured somebody somewhere may like to see it /shrug.





Is it possible motherboard manufacturers can work around this, I.E when I flashed my GB gaming 5 from stock BIOS to latest beta BIOS I was sure it dropped CPU temp by ~20c but thought I imagined it lol.
Thanks for this. I'm thinking of ditching my 360 AiO and getting a D15 for my Ryzen build.
 
Associate
Joined
8 Mar 2017
Posts
12
Location
Kent
Dam post this in wrong place

Hey all + @AMDMatt I got c6h and followed your step by step Pstate and following the post on overclock.net. Too much info there so i follow yours ;) from here.
Only thing I'd like a 2nd opinion on is these volts. you think they wrong readings from mobo coz they high across board. Psu is brand new leadex II Gold Thanks
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,103
Thanks for this. I'm thinking of ditching my 360 AiO and getting a D15 for my Ryzen build.
You probably won't need to remove the second 150mm fan, it's worth checking dimensions but I only had to do it because my small case barely has enough clearance for the heat-sink itself and I had to raise the fan due to memory clearance (my X79 system was using low profile DDR3 and nobody is making LP DDR4 yet).
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Nov 2006
Posts
9,237
Well made video of first boot. No tests ect full on water loop from start total of 4 hours of draining filling swapping my 5820 to 1700x


Yeah, water can be a pain when swapping.

Mine took a full day basically, but I was also removing a radiator and simplifying things.

Hope I don't regret removing the 420mm...
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,887
Location
United Kingdom
Dam post this in wrong place

Hey all + @AMDMatt I got c6h and followed your step by step Pstate and following the post on overclock.net. Too much info there so i follow yours ;) from here.
Only thing I'd like a 2nd opinion on is these volts. you think they wrong readings from mobo coz they high across board. Psu is brand new leadex II Gold Thanks

Looks good, i have fine tuned my settings now so have a few suggestions.

1. Change VDDSoc voltage to offset and put it at +02500. If needs be you can go higher but yours is way too high, try and stay below 1.15v tops. I think i was using 1.175v when i made that post.
2. Set PLL voltage at 1.85v, i found this helps when overclocking the memory at high CPU frequency.
3. CPU Voltage looks okay, but perhaps you can lower it a bit if you are only running at 3.8Ghz. 4Ghz should require around 1.4v or higher. 3.8Ghz should be around 1.3v or lower.
 
Permabanned
Joined
15 Oct 2011
Posts
6,311
Location
Nottingham Carlton
Yeah, water can be a pain when swapping.

Mine took a full day basically, but I was also removing a radiator and simplifying things.

Hope I don't regret removing the 420mm...


Im on external ALWAYS ez to drain ect. Always tempted to go 1080 NOVA and use it as side pc panel :)


bcd2e4d8b785c02d.jpg




Had not much time to mess around. Problems booting at 3000mem on 100bclock but works fine @ 112.4. Fast Dirty OC :D

Vcore set is 1.4 jumps sometimes to 1.417 on llc3. On auto stock settings was jumping pass 1.5 LOL
 
Associate
Joined
8 Mar 2017
Posts
12
Location
Kent
What im worried about is I set set things manel boot and/or check bios and it show higher than what i have set.

IE PLL set at 1.8 gives a reading of 1.95
CPU SOC man @1.13 Gives 1.22
Even the 12v 5v n 3.3v are over
This is my concern ...

Why the fk did they put the DMM points under the 24pin hard to measure but i will be trying this in a sec and compare metered results to reported
Is the only way i can stop myself from worrying Before going to 4g oc
 
Back
Top Bottom