lol
Im tempted to get the Redeemer, then CCU up to the Retaliator in the future, i could probably do the same with the $85 Herald, but its still going to cost the same amount in the end, and if the Herald takes 12mo to hangar, and the 'tali is flyable in 9mo, then im almost certainly waiting for a CCU path. Plus, hangar toys!!
Theres only about 8 of us in our BF clan/org, and 4 of us with more than 1 sub-$80 ship (and follow things fairly closely) and between us we've got a nice mix of paths, thats my focus, i'll buy what i fancy, but i wouldnt buy the Carrack as i know it'll trample on our org leaders Aquilla. If CIG can move the Alpha from his Conny to a 325 package, i think he'd buy it anyway.
In total, i believe we've got a Reclaimer, Starfarer, Aquilla, Freelancer DUR & MAX, Cutlass Red, about 6 capable single seaters, and 5 LN's, plus a Redeemer/Retaliator most likely.
@moon
The FPS stuff is being handled by an sub-contracted FPS team (Illfonic) who have experience of FPS games in the Cryengine, so the only thing CIG do is relay data with them and whatnot, and Foundry 42 (here in Manchester) is dealing with the Sq42 side incl a lot of the military ships, so they'll be doing the MoCap stuff and sending that to Illfonic.
They've got a decent handle on the whole thing IMO, they outsource where they feel they can, like the AI stuff is handled by a small UK team.
Theres a lot of studios involved, Austin, Santa Monica & Manchester are in-house, they've got Illfonic (FPS) in Denver, Turbulent (Web) and a load of freelance artists around the world too. Im sure theres a couple more im forgetting too, like the AI guys.
Its just a case of overseeing it all, working together, and getting it done. They're not spreading themselves thin, they're expanding and outsourcing as the project requires them to.