Pentagon releases UFO footage

Screeeech said:
It's a fake alien @Pottsey it's just a stupid hoax like all of the other nonsense,

You can literally see the clay and stuff that it's made out of,

For gods sake man!
Click to expand...
If you actually bothered to look at the data including the scans you can see they are literally not clay or paper mach. The eggs for example have embryos inside at various stages of gestation. Those types of scans are impossible to fake as in they are real eggs with real embryos 100% biological and organic.

The MRI scans show a slice of the body going down section by section 100% proving they are not just clay or paper mache as they have traces of muscles, tendons, ligaments, blood vessels and so on.

The outside bit you call clay is due to them being in a diatom mine for over a 1000 years which lead to their desiccated preservation. The bones match how we would expect them to be in a diatom mines for 1000+ years. Due to the desiccation process the internal organs have been preserved.

Carbon dating puts them at over 1000 years old which also matches the same time as the end of the Nazca culture. A culture which was active in the same location the bodies have been found and a culture which have art work of creatures like this with 3 fingers matching the bodies. I am sure you have heard of the Nazca lines shapes that are best seen from the air. All precolumbian cultures in textiles, ceramics, and even petroglyph form from around that time frame in the same area had imaginary matching these bodies right down to having 3 fingers.

They took cells from the head, trunk and extremities and the analysis showed that they all belong to the same body.

You want to say they are fake that's fine. But at least come up with a proper debunk not proven nonsense about being made of clay or paper mache. A full scientific analysis was done by two different respectable Universities who published the results for peer review. Data that is publicly available to download. Same for the DNA analyses we can download it and view all the DNA profiles and data. Looking at the data they published I am having trouble explaining the data away. The DNA testing, carbon dating, MRI scans, cell testing all look real and done by real Radiologists and Biologists. How do you explain that?
 
Last edited:
Screeeech said:
I'd rather be in the dentist having teeth pulled, than spend 10 pages arguing over a paper mache alien.
Click to expand...
The DNA tests, MRI and X-Ray show they are not paper mache. Your always asking for scientific evidence and what a surprise when you are given scientific evidence you do what you always do ignore the evidence and create a fake narrative. Fine we can drop this as clearly you only care about your own crazy conspiracy theories rather then the real evidence backed up by the Scientific method.

The difference between you and me is I want to debunk it with a proper scientific method and with a way that matches the evidence and data. You on the other hand just seem to want to make up fake excuses and dismiss everything out of hand no matter what the evidence and facts are. I bet you didn't even bother to look at the raw data the Scientist uploaded publicly.
 
sigma said:
Could it be remains of non human/homosapien but still non alien?
Click to expand...
Its extremely unlikely but it could in theory be an unknown life form from this planet that's never been found before or died out long ago. It would explain why so many old cultures have references to small humanoids with 3 fingers, big eyes etc. I am not convinced but its a remote possibility. So remote I am more likely to win the lottery 3 times in a row but not flat out impossible. I am not convinced nor am I convinced they are Alien. Its just the DNA tests, MRI and X-Ray are a bit of a puzzle right now.
 
Pottsey said:
The difference between you and me is I want to debunk it with a proper scientific method and with a way that matches the evidence and data.
Click to expand...

qTTOkdz.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom