Overall, it has a lot of promise, but feels unfinished. e.g. why are the streaming limitations so low via VD and the Streaming Assistant. The USB connection "should" be able to support upto 10Gbps, so why does it appear to be capped at 120Mbps?
This is a direct reply to Mr_Sukebe but, also replying to people earlier in this thread who were wondering about wifi 5 or wifi 6 and USB connection etc.
In any headset that relies on Streaming over USB/Wireless, the limiting factor is usually the decoder on the headset. The information is encoded on your computer and sent to the headset via USB or Wireless, then decoded and displayed. The decoder can only handle so much info at a time, doesn't matter how much bandwidth you have.
First wireless. If you are using a router as dedicated access point for the Pico 4/Quest 2, then there will be no difference between a Wifi 6 router and a Wifi 5 router. The reason why GGodin, the Virtual Desktop developer, recommends Wifi 6 routers is that they might be better where the router is the home router and might not be in the same room as the where you are using the headset. The problems with some of the routers that are supplied by ISPs is that the don't have the best Wifi or might not have the best CPU for handling constant streams of data. However, the biggest issues with ISP provided routers is that they sometimes don't have gigabit LAN ports. If you don't have a gigabit connection between your computer and the router that the headset connects to, you won't have a great experience.
USB connection: A USB connection should be better than Wifi. I would say that getting PCVR up and running wasn't a high Priority for Bytedance with the Pico 4. When/if they update the software the USB connection should improve a lot.