This is extremely pleasing to me, but I somehow doubt it will be as pleasing to you, so deep breath and :
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/theresa-may-terrorism-human-rights_uk_5936ec0be4b0099e7fafd14d
"Theresa May is vowing to tear up human rights laws that stand in the way of her fight against terrorism.
In a speech this evening, the Prime Minister called for greater powers to restrict the movement of terror suspects - even if authorities are unable to convince a judge the measure is needed.
May also called for longer prison sentences for people convicted of terrorist offences and promised to make it easier to deport foreign terrorists back to their home countries.
It has been suggested the Tory leader may need to pull out of aspects of the European Convention on Human Rights to push through the changes."
No I saw her speech and read that before I posted. My question is, I don't think she can pick and choose on which bits she wants to keep so its all in or all out.
Plus we have laws that could have arrested and kept these scum from doing the attack and one was on a eu watch list and even announced he was a terrorist when he arrived here yet we never used any of our laws against him.
What's the point of new laws if we don't use existing laws? Deflection tactics as she knows she is to blame,