It's all part of the plan. If you kill off enough of the population, the health and social care budgets will go a lot further.
Poll: Poll: UK General Election 2017 - Mk II
- Thread starter Zefan
- Start date
- Status
It's all part of the plan. If you kill off enough of the population, the health and social care budgets will go a lot further.
I don't think you'll find anyone disagreeing that social care and the NHS need to be worked out. Where's the money coming from then? Those PFI deals helped a lot, could have paid for the whole of the NHS for 2 years basically.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,676
Realistic? They have an uncosted manifesto and won't give figures or estimates for anything.
Actual legitimate investment in the country, the GDP growth would raise taxes with increased investment. Honestly neither party really cares about the economy as long as Canary wharf is focused upon 100% of the time.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,676
The top 5% of earners and a corporation tax rise, if you are labour.
Tories won't actually tell you what taxes they are planning to raise.
Come on, Labour are just making **** up and promising whatever they think they can plausibly get away with. Their perfect world ideals will make everyone equally poor in the end.
Where's this investment coming from when Labour heavily tax the most monetary mobile people and business's?
There's a good example of a properly costed Conservative policy here: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/e...lunch-scrap-education-manifesto-a7752991.html
The budget they proposed basically gets our kids a single dry wheetabix knock-off each. That's how much our kids are worth to them.
Don't be deluded, IFS has already said that is a massive black spot.
Well considering the Conservatives don't allow businesses to set up without huge headaches, it doesn't really matter, there's nothing to tax.
Huh? and under Labour's manifesto, it'll be better?
Google, Starbucks, Amazon, Vodafone and any other multinational that will just upsticks and **** off if they can't get away with dodging their tax.
Why are we paying for other kid's food in the 1st place? Someone has to draw a line with some of this stuff.
Google, Starbucks, Amazon, Vodafone and any other multinational that will just upsticks and **** off if they can't get away with dodging their tax.
You think they won't be doing the same thing? They'll always find loopholes. Although i do agree, they need to be pressed.
Well no. Half the country are permanently not going to get what they want, which means no one will. This is exactly the sort of time where PR would be helpful.
Associate
- Joined
- 23 Dec 2012
- Posts
- 657
The Tories are 1/20 to win and Corbyn's bulk of popularity seems to come from Labour party members who are quite young. He's preaching to the converted with those people, outwith those rallies even his own MPs defy him and seem to find him a hindrance.
And herein lies the main issue with conservatives. We pay for other children's food because because we have empathy, we pay for it because it betters humanity. Do you really want the cut off point being paying a couple % less tax so that you don't have to subsidize food for children?
- Status