Poll: Poll: UK General Election 2017 - Mk II

Who will you vote for?


  • Total voters
    1,453
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2010
Posts
23,836
Location
Lincs
There's a massive difference from the devaluation of sterling after Brexit, where our economy remained competitive and resilient and could take advantage of currency fluctuations, and a hypothetical devaluation following a Corbyn win, where our economy will shrink and stagnate because no-one will invest in us.

Well yes, there is a MASSIVE difference......one is real and the other the figment of your imagination

lolscorza

You should be praying for a Labour win, that way you can blame them for the wrecking of the economy your Brexit vote is already going to do to us
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2004
Posts
4,788
Location
Hertfordshire
Past Cons voter back in 2015 and I have grown to really dislike what they are bringing to the table. I want to vote LD this time but I feel it's a waste to do so in my current constituency so despite not being entirely happy about what they are proposing, Labour seem to be the only realistic option here against what was a Tory majority in 2015 - the recent locals elections were also Labour (but only by a small majority to Cons) so I suppose that's a good indicator. Is there any point in sticking to what I actually want to vote and go LD or should I stay with the tactical option?
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Dec 2003
Posts
11,133
Location
Wiltshire
^^ it depends. I mean Labour this time round are DRASTICALLY different to 2105, way further to the left. The Cons are even using a Miliband policy of capping energy prices. I'd argue they have gone a little bit right and a little bit left in an attempt to get further support from a wider number of the electorate, but this has backfired with the Social Care pledge (this is a socialist policy, the sort Labour WOULD NOT reverse, they secretly like it).

I still think the Lib Dems have the best policies, despite my objection to them on Europe.
 
Permabanned
Joined
23 Apr 2014
Posts
23,551
Location
Hertfordshire
So anyone else seen the labour proposal to change council tax to a land value tax.

Based on their costing document would put my council tax bill up to over 4k a year :/

50% of house value is land value they say and they want to put a level of up to 3%of the land value

Have not bothered to check all this information but could well be fake news(the land tax and the associates figures).

"The right-wing press are LYING to you about Labour’s ‘Land Value Tax’. Here’s the truth."
http://evolvepolitics.com/right-wing-press-lying-labours-land-value-tax-heres-truth/
 
Associate
Joined
22 Sep 2007
Posts
2,181
Location
Abingdon
All it takes is an old, privileged, white male to unlock the talent of ethnic minorities. Who knew?



Nothing like a bit of divide-and-conquer. No mention of the fact that the lowest educational attainment is among working class white boys.



Looks like the politics of victimisation and division coming back to the fore.
 
Don
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
22,954
Location
Wargrave, UK
I like this land value tax. For me, it would almost certainly result in a tax rise as my house is worth about £350k even though it's a modest 2-bed semi. However, if it results in the less well off having to pay less due to them renting then I'm all for it.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Mar 2007
Posts
9,763
Location
SW London
All it takes is an old, privileged, white male to unlock the talent of ethnic minorities. Who knew?



Nothing like a bit of divide-and-conquer. No mention of the fact that the lowest educational attainment is among working class white boys.



Looks like the politics of victimisation and division coming back to the fore.
I thought these were fake for a second, just checked his twitter to see it's real hahahah
 
Associate
Joined
11 Nov 2003
Posts
1,696
Location
South Yorkshire
Past Cons voter back in 2015 and I have grown to really dislike what they are bringing to the table. I want to vote LD this time but I feel it's a waste to do so in my current constituency so despite not being entirely happy about what they are proposing, Labour seem to be the only realistic option here against what was a Tory majority in 2015 - the recent locals elections were also Labour (but only by a small majority to Cons) so I suppose that's a good indicator. Is there any point in sticking to what I actually want to vote and go LD or should I stay with the tactical option?
If Labour seem like the realistic opposition in your constituency and you don't like Conservative policy, then I'd say the tactical option is your best bet. I don't think that we'll see a Labour win outright, and a hung parliament is still an outside bet, but a Conservative victory with a functional opposition might make the future bearable.

The cynic in me wonders if May has deliberately sabotaged her own campaign. She keeps banging on about how the only way we'll get a good Brexit deal is with a large Con majority, and I suspect she knows that whatever deal we actually get won't be viewed as "good" by the public (even if it's the best we could hope for) so *not* having that large majority allows her to deflect the blame. If it weren't for some of their outlandish and harmful policies, I'd be all for giving them a go with a huge majority. There'd be nowhere to hide then.

[Who am I kidding? They'll always find someone to blame. Even if they had a large majority and got the best bad deal possible, they'd presumably blame it on the EU negotiators for being stubborn or punitive.]
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2004
Posts
4,788
Location
Hertfordshire
If Labour seem like the realistic opposition in your constituency and you don't like Conservative policy, then I'd say the tactical option is your best bet. I don't think that we'll see a Labour win outright, and a hung parliament is still an outside bet, but a Conservative victory with a functional opposition might make the future bearable.

The cynic in me wonders if May has deliberately sabotaged her own campaign. She keeps banging on about how the only way we'll get a good Brexit deal is with a large Con majority, and I suspect she knows that whatever deal we actually get won't be viewed as "good" by the public (even if it's the best we could hope for) so *not* having that large majority allows her to deflect the blame. If it weren't for some of their outlandish and harmful policies, I'd be all for giving them a go with a huge majority. There'd be nowhere to hide then.

[Who am I kidding? They'll always find someone to blame. Even if they had a large majority and got the best bad deal possible, they'd presumably blame it on the EU negotiators for being stubborn or punitive.]

A decent opposition would be a positive if nothing else, i suppose! I don't like the Cons policy in general - all their major points and focus is completely opposed to my own views. Having said that, quite a bit of Labour's policy falls in the same category - it's just I consider them to be the lesser of two evils despite Labour's policies being more likely to negatively impact me financially.

What circumstances would potentially see a form of coalition government?

Politics at the moment - particularly the tories brand of it - seems to be a game of 'who can we blame for our **** ups this time' rather than taking responsibility.
 
Caporegime
Joined
20 Jan 2005
Posts
45,767
Location
Co Durham
I like this land value tax. For me, it would almost certainly result in a tax rise as my house is worth about £350k even though it's a modest 2-bed semi. However, if it results in the less well off having to pay less due to them renting then I'm all for it.

I suspect it would be a tax drop or even neutral. Unless you have 5 acres of landscaped gardens or something I cant see your plot been worth more than £50k £60k so your land tax instead of your council tax would be £1500 to £1800.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom