Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That does not mean its marketing rubbish. All it shows is a single game that had RT bolted on last minuet doesn't work very well. It doesn't mean all other games cannot bolt on a better use of RT or even be designed for RT from the start. You shouldn't base how good or bad RT is at a feature based on 1 limited example.Marketing rubbish mate
Have a look here the performance at 1080p
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Grafi...ormance-in-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1263244/
bloody unacceptable even as gimmick. 28-30fps at 1080p? Seriously?
This thread will make Nvidia *very* happy - 10.3% uptake of their flagship card is probably much higher than they expected and certainly a great deal higher than the uptake of the 1080Ti based on Steam stats.
I don't care about ray tracing at the moment
I wasn't being sarcastic - Nvidia will be very pleased with this result a 10% take-up of a flagship card is an excellent result - 1080Ti isn't anywhere near that level. As for the 30fps crap - first it wasn't 30fps, second it has been made very clear already from several of the people who were there for that demo, that this was a very early RTX build of Tomb Raider with non-optimised drivers, I expect performance will be much higher at launch - probably 120+ fps at 1080p and 50+ fps at 4k for the Ti (pre-overclocking).Well that is good it shows Nvidia what the consumer thinks.
I assume and apparently, from what i read this could be one of the biggest disappointment ever, you know 30fps at 1080p so to speak but i will be waiting for benchmarks.
Not many do, just nVidia pushing their usual ******.
This thread will make Nvidia *very* happy - 10.3% uptake of their flagship card is probably much higher than they expected and certainly a great deal higher than the uptake of the 1080Ti based on Steam stats.
I've just arrived at this thread and my vote would have been no, adding to that large percentage of people saying No, but I can't now as voting is closed.This thread will make Nvidia *very* happy - 10.3% uptake of their flagship card is probably much higher than they expected and certainly a great deal higher than the uptake of the 1080Ti based on Steam stats.
Holy **** that price. This thing better make me tea in the morning....
For perspective I paid £499 for a 980ti 3 years ago. I thought the 1080 pricey but these are silly money.
Intel and AMD really need to up their game and miners need to leave the GPU market to sort the crazy pricing out.
If you didn't get it already, the answer is no.
Merged a few threads in to this one, so apologies to anyone that voted in the other threads.