Soldato
The more you buy, the more you save!!Takes note. Buys another Nvidia GPU
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The more you buy, the more you save!!Takes note. Buys another Nvidia GPU
Meh... nothing wrong with a bit of fun.
The is 7900XT 34% faster than the 6800XT at 15% more expensive with its new $750 price, that's still not good, but also much better than almost all of Nvidia's stuff.
The one thing with that is the 7800XT is very unlikely to be more expensive that the 6800XT was at $650, Actually given the 4070 is $600 its likely to be $550 at most and a 60 CU 7800 between $450 and $500, that would make the 4060Ti 16GB at $500 look absolutely ridiculous given the 7800 is likely to be very much faster.....
Again the 4060 series is just stupid, IMO that was Nvidia's biggest mistake being that greedy with such a crap card.
problem is the new $750 is now £799.99 at OcUK. The Sapphire reference model is £829.99!
problem is the new $750 is now £799.99 at OcUK. The Sapphire reference model is £829.99!
Prime Day is a week or so away. Might be that so companies can announce sale prices.
Pricerunner is great for checking "sale" prices to be fair.
Are we expecting sales outside of the prime one?
Make no sense selling cheaper as if the competition keep raising prices like Nvidia kept doing to give the extra shiny tax well then the market is what it is.Are AMD just as bad as Nvidia when it comes to over pricing this generation of GPU compared with their last generation?
3090: $1499 MSRP
4090: $1599 MSRP (7% more expensive)
Performance
3090: 100%
4090: 164%
-----------
3080: $699 MSRP
4080: $1199 MSRP (86% more expensive)
Performance
3080: 100%
4080: 148%
-----------
3070Ti: $599 MSRP
4070Ti: $799 MSRP (33% more expensive)
Performance
3070Ti: 100%
4070Ti: 142%
------------
3070: $499 MSRP
4070: $599 MSRP (20% more expensive)
Performance
3070: 100%
4070: 124%
-----------
3060Ti: $399 MSRP
4060Ti: $399 MSRP
Performance
3060Ti: 100%
4060Ti: 106%
------------
3060: $329 MSRP (10% more expensive)
4060: $299 MSRP
Performance
3060: 100%
4060: 110%
----------------------------------------------------------
6900XT: $999 MSRP
7900XTX: $999 MSRP
Performance
6900XT: 100%
7900XTX: 150%
---------------
6800XT: $649 MSRP
7900XT: $899 MSRP (38% more expensive)
Performance
6800XT: 100%
7900XT: 134%
--------------
6600: $329 MSRP (22% more expensive)
7600: $269 MSRP
Performance
6600: 100%
7600: 127%
--------------
Source TPU here and here
So far i don't think they are, i think Nvidia are much worse. Other then the 7900XT what you get vs the last generation with AMD has been pretty good, lets see if that continues.
With Nvidia other than the 4090 its all just bad, some of it really very bad.
I will add to this as more cards get released.
Make no sense selling cheaper as if the competition keep raising prices like Nvidia kept doing to give the extra shiny tax well then the market is what it is.
That alongside wafer costs, design cost, production cost, transport cost etc...
anyhow really happy with the 6700xt running 4k and playing games
Wait until the vRAM performance hits on that 3080 ) And there's also DLSS3 where applicable... TBH, leaving the price difference aside, I don't really know how I'd compare those 2 with those 2 aspects in mind (plus that SER thing).Mm..
3080: $699 MSRP
4080: $1199 MSRP (86% more expensive)
Performance
3080: 100%
4080: 148%
The fact that they sold even one of those ^^^ is mindblowing to me.
On the one hand i think this is the perfect opportunity for AMD to grab marketshare, on the other i'm thinking pretty much no matter what AMD do it wont make the blindest bit of difference because AMD don't have DLSS.
I think a lot of people would buy for pure raster performance without DLSS if they felt they were being compensated by a lot price difference between the AMD card and Nvidia. All that lost extra for only a 10% price difference still favours Nvidia really. The only thing they have to counter offer with is more vRAM.
The gap is smaller (13%) cheapest for cheapest between the XTX and 4080, currently £975 Vs £1100 on overclockers.
Considering the advantage of DLSS 2+3, RT, lower power consumption (could save you the cost of a new PSU + the large gap in older / simpler games), for sure 4080 makes a lot of sense.The gap is smaller (13%) cheapest for cheapest between the XTX and 4080, currently £975 Vs £1100 on overclockers.
Considering the advantage of DLSS 2+3, RT, lower power consumption (could save you the cost of a new PSU + the large gap in older / simpler games), for sure 4080 makes a lot of sense.
If the vRAM will end up being a problem on the 4080... well, will be funny since there were plenty of "go with 6800/xt or 6900xt/6950xt since it has 16GB vRAM" in the read team
Considering the advantage of DLSS 2+3, RT, lower power consumption (could save you the cost of a new PSU + the large gap in older / simpler games), for sure 4080 makes a lot of sense.
If the vRAM will end up being a problem on the 4080... well, will be funny since there were plenty of "go with 6800/xt or 6900xt/6960xt since it has 16GB vRAM" in the read team