• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Reality check, are AMD just as bad as Nvidia.

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
100,883
Location
South Coast
I wouldn't hold your breath if current rumours are true and the 50 series aren't going to be the performance gains over 40 series that people are expecting, at least not the 4080/4090 anyway. Plus, if it does end up being better by a lot, will the price increase over a 40 series align with the perf gains? It's not a trend we have seen outside of a halo card like the 4090, to which there still is no equal from any other brand, so high prices for high end cards are likely to remain, well, high :p
 
Associate
Joined
31 Dec 2010
Posts
2,469
Location
Sussex
AD102 is already 608mm² on TSMC 4nm (TSMC 5nm and 4nm are almost identical).
ProcessGate pitchMetal pitchYear
5 nm51 nm30 nm2020
3 nm48 nm24 nm2022
2 nm45 nm20 nm2024?

Not that gate pitch is everything.
Later on that Wiki article they mention density. That plus:
Gets us something like this
TSMCMtr/mm²Mtr for 600mm² diecompared
N5 / N5P
138​
82,800​
97%​
N4
143​
85,800​
100%​
N3
220​
132,000​
154%​
I guess +50% could be okay. I also expect they won't go as crazy as they did with AD102 (since nodes are slowing down, going for near the rectile limit right at the beginning is a bit "crazy").

Next gen or the one after, Nvidia too will have to go chiplet.

Now, 600mm² halo cards tell us little what a 5080 and lower could bring.

AD103 is only 380mm², so even if sticking to N4 they could improve it a bit by moving that tier to a 450-500mm² die. All at the cost of margins of course, so they won't be keen to do that.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2019
Posts
17,830
Tsmc 3nm is yields are still quite bad so not sure when nvidia and amd can make the switch. I guess amd will focus on cost and use 4nm and 5nm instead. Nvidia will want 3nm but yeah it's not great at this stage, who knows what it looks like next year

As for those 3nm yields, tsmc is only getting a yield of 50% while manufacturing Apple's upcoming tiny A17 SoC. The yields are bad enough that Apple has now told Tsmc it no longer wants to pay per wafer and wants to only pay for working chips otherwise the cost is ridiculous. The cost per wafer is about $20k USD
 
Last edited:

TNA

TNA

Caporegime
Joined
13 Mar 2008
Posts
28,199
Location
Greater London
I wouldn't hold your breath if current rumours are true and the 50 series aren't going to be the performance gains over 40 series that people are expecting, at least not the 4080/4090 anyway. Plus, if it does end up being better by a lot, will the price increase over a 40 series align with the perf gains? It's not a trend we have seen outside of a halo card like the 4090, to which there still is no equal from any other brand, so high prices for high end cards are likely to remain, well, high :p

Where are you hearing this from? WTFtech? :p
 

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
100,883
Location
South Coast

TNA

TNA

Caporegime
Joined
13 Mar 2008
Posts
28,199
Location
Greater London

And their source?

Hi, my name is...

:cry::cry::cry:
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Aug 2009
Posts
2,869
I wouldn't hold your breath if current rumours are true and the 50 series aren't going to be the performance gains over 40 series that people are expecting, at least not the 4080/4090 anyway. Plus, if it does end up being better by a lot, will the price increase over a 40 series align with the perf gains? It's not a trend we have seen outside of a halo card like the 4090, to which there still is no equal from any other brand, so high prices for high end cards are likely to remain, well, high :p
I was being ironic :p

To see a bad pricing card being made great just because it looks decent compared to another bad priced card is quite funny :)
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
31 Jan 2022
Posts
2,738
Location
UK
Yes. Praying Intel stick it out.

Same here.

NVIDIA has crossed a line where I really begrudge giving them any more money. I'm disgusted with Mini-Me-AMD. I am not sure if I can hang on until intel get their act together, but I really hope so, because I sure am going to resent having to pay towards any more leather jackets/kitchen utensils.
 
Last edited:

TNA

TNA

Caporegime
Joined
13 Mar 2008
Posts
28,199
Location
Greater London
Same here.

NVIDIA has crossed a line where I really begrudge giving them any more money. I'm disgusted with Mini-Me-AMD. I am not sure if I can hang on until intel get their act together, but I really hope so, because I sure am going to resent having to pay towards any more leather jackets/kitchen utensils.

Nvidia crossed that line with me back in the GTX 970 days. But AMD has not made things easy and even they have crossed it too of late with their silly pricing. So what does one do? Many vocal lot seem to just slate Nvidia, recommend AMD and then go buy Nvidia anyways it seems.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Feb 2019
Posts
17,830
I have a 2070 Super, i paid £440 for it, its more than 3 years old, it was released 4 years ago, almost to the day.

I'm looking for a worthwhile 16GB replacement with AV1 encode / decode for around the same money, 4 years and 2 generations later there must be something, any takers?


Why do you need an upgrade? Why must it have AV1 and why must it have 16gb?

Please provide a good answer
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,910
Location
Planet Earth
Nvidia crossed that line with me back in the GTX 970 days. But AMD has not made things easy and even they have crossed it too of late with their silly pricing. So what does one do? Many vocal lot seem to just slate Nvidia, recommend AMD and then go buy Nvidia anyways it seems.

Fed up with both of them. If Starfield runs OK on my current card,I might just try and hold on with it. We finally are getting some information about the RX7700XT:

I really hope it is 54 CUs not 48 CUs,because at least that will be 30% faster than an RX6700XT/RTX3060TI. But with the RTX4060TI being so rubbish,I expect it might be 48 CU! :(
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TNA
Associate
Joined
22 Nov 2020
Posts
1,459
4090, best value.
718528_1661440411723.png
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
OP
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
48,254
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Fed up with both of them. If Starfield runs OK on my current card,I might just try and hold on with it. We finally are getting some information about the RX7700XT:

I really hope it is 54 CUs not 48 CUs,because at least that will be 30% faster than an RX6700XT/RTX3060TI. But with the RTX4060TI being so rubbish,I expect it might be 48 CU! :(

The 48 CU one would put it 30% faster than the 6700XT, that would make it about 90% the performance of the 6800XT or RTX 4070, or a few % faster than the RX 6800.

The 7900XTX was priced in line with the 6900XT, $999
The 7900XT was way over priced at $899 but has now been officially reduced to $749
The 7600 was priced 22% lower than the 6600 while being 27% faster at $269

Whatever comes next must be priced lower than $749.

7800XT: $649?
7800: $579?
7700XT $479?

Those 3 prices are the same as the previous gen they are replacing.

IMO from that slide the 60 CU one is the RX 7800.
The 70 CU one the RX 7800XT.

UK price if current exchange rates hold:

7800XT: £595
7800: £462
7700XT: £439
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom