• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

RTX 4070 12GB, is it Worth it?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have some screenshots if you like. DLSS + High Textures > native + ultra textures > fsr + Ultra textures.

Sad story for the vram warriors, but it's true. Personal attacks against me may help you pat each other in the back but they won't change the facts.
At present the 4070 is good card, not brilliant but good, with a poor price but its looking increasing likely that 12Gb VRAM will not last, as the minimum standard, as long as 8GB did and that 16GB for the long run is.

Most people buy GPU's to last years but its looking like 12GB will not do so, most likely due to most games companies looking at consoles at the same time as PC's, and sell more to Consoles, and they offer 16GB VRAM, so make games with that in mind.
As we have seen the PC optimisation is often poor so 8GB is not enough and in some cases 12GB is just enough.
 
Someone modded a 3070 to have 16GB VRAM, impressive uplift.

 
I have some screenshots if you like. DLSS + High Textures > native + ultra textures > fsr + Ultra textures.

Sad story for the vram warriors, but it's true. Personal attacks against me may help you pat each other in the back but they won't change the facts.

That is true for Hogwarts because the ultra settings are ****** and in many cases looks better with high settings (and a small number of ultra) than all ultra. It isn't true for many other games.
 
At present the 4070 is good card, not brilliant but good, with a poor price but its looking increasing likely that 12Gb VRAM will not last, as the minimum standard, as long as 8GB did and that 16GB for the long run is.

Most people buy GPU's to last years but its looking like 12GB will not do so, most likely due to most games companies looking at consoles at the same time as PC's, and sell more to Consoles, and they offer 16GB VRAM, so make games with that in mind.
As we have seen the PC optimisation is often poor so 8GB is not enough and in some cases 12GB is just enough.

The 4070 does well as part of the 3000 stack but isn't great as a generation on generation improvement. As a 4060 at a moderately lower price it would have been a great card.
 
At present the 4070 is good card, not brilliant but good, with a poor price but its looking increasing likely that 12Gb VRAM will not last, as the minimum standard, as long as 8GB did and that 16GB for the long run is.

Most people buy GPU's to last years but its looking like 12GB will not do so, most likely due to most games companies looking at consoles at the same time as PC's, and sell more to Consoles, and they offer 16GB VRAM, so make games with that in mind.
As we have seen the PC optimisation is often poor so 8GB is not enough and in some cases 12GB is just enough.
Well I never understood what 12gb will not last even means. I played hogwarts on a 3060ti 3440x1440p with everything maxed out except textures (high) on ultra. As I've said before, it looks better than fsr with ultra textures, so I'd rather have the option of dlss then extra vram

Is there a game currently that you can't play on 8gb cards? I wanna try that's why I'm asking.
 
True, its a balancing act but this generation Nvidia has gone to far on price, people expected increases but not the massive rises seen.
True, but I mean there isn't an ideal option from AMD given how much they've increased the price as well - or haven't decrease it enough for older gen given they don't have 7xxx models in the lower tiers. Is bad from both sides.

4070 is about as fast as an 7900xt (a bit less, a bit above, depending per game/resolution as per TPU) in RT. DLSS up to performance is usable (in my experience), most of the time which can give about 2x the perf. improvement. Image quality degrades too much with FSR on Performance.

4070 is about as fast as a 6800xt (direct competitor), in rasterization, way faster in RT and better with DLSS (which means in games with RT + DLSS will be a whole lot faster compared to 6800xt), less power hungry, smaller (so will fit better in a case), but only 12GB vRAM which may or may not be problematic, so not really ideal.

At least with 16GB vRAM the 4070 would have been the card to go, given the current landscape, as you'd get the best from everything (minus the prices, obviously).

So, either go with AMD and hope that games use more than 12GB vRAM (so the 16GB purchase makes sense when all else is equal or worse than competition), or go with nVIDIA and hope that 12GB vRAM will be enough for your resolution or at least that using lower settings don't degrade the image too much - or like Bencher said, use DLSS when performance is needed and pray for the same or better image quality. Can't say I'm a fan of either of those choices.
 
Last edited:
Well I never understood what 12gb will not last even means. I played hogwarts on a 3060ti 3440x1440p with everything maxed out except textures (high) on ultra. As I've said before, it looks better than fsr with ultra textures, so I'd rather have the option of dlss then extra vram

Is there a game currently that you can't play on 8gb cards? I wanna try that's why I'm asking.
Have you tried Forespoken?
 
That is true for Hogwarts because the ultra settings are ****** and in many cases looks better with high settings (and a small number of ultra) than all ultra. It isn't true for many other games.
Well hogwarts is one of the notorious vram hogging games. The other ones look mediocre to bad regardless of settings, like forspoken godfall etc.
 
Well I never understood what 12gb will not last even means. I played hogwarts on a 3060ti 3440x1440p with everything maxed out except textures (high) on ultra. As I've said before, it looks better than fsr with ultra textures, so I'd rather have the option of dlss then extra vram

Is there a game currently that you can't play on 8gb cards? I wanna try that's why I'm asking.
I suppose what I mean the timeframe, on which you can play on High settings, on a new card, then medium and then low, over time, is getting narrower.
8GB lasted 10 years, I do not see 12GB lasting that.

Of course games can still be played at 8GB, but for how much longer?
 
What I don't understand is, what has changed from before?

Before the 3xxx series, most of the time a new generation came out, all the old stuff was sold mega cheap to clear stock.

I just don't understand this tactic of keeping the old stuff at the same price and releasing the new stuff all at higher price points, instead of just replacing the old ones.

It feels illogical and perhaps even driven by some sort of algorithm/ AI that can't understand why 3 series sales were so ridiculously good. So it just thinks that GPUs will always sell out instantly, hence the higher prices.
1. In the past Nvidia and Amd would stop producing old gen cards for weeks before the next gen came out, so that there were not many to have to reduce. As they over produced this time & had more stock left over they didn't want to reduce them as much and take a hit to margins.
2. Also Nvidia has been gradually reducing the prices from the mining boom scalper prices to MRSP in order to get gamers to buy before the cards actually fell to MRSP. Some gamers looked on a card which was £200 over MRSP as a "bargain" compared to the mining boom price. Its only just now that the gradual reduction in price on Nvidia cards is nearer to MRSP. I remember threads that would be something like, the 3070ti is down to £799 should I buy now for gaming? So if gamers were thinking about buying cards at £200 over MRSP why would Nvidia and the AIBs rush prices down?
3. Going forward I wonder how much Nvidia and AND are overpricing cards at launch with the view that they can cream extra profit from the early adopters and then reduce the price later on to get extra sales. If you look at AMD cpus they often come down to a much better price if you don't buy straight away, they could adopt this pricing strategy to gpus
4. Prices in the UK often seem to be higher than in the USA at the moment, with the brick and mortar store I use in St Louis, Missouri having 3 types of AMD 6600 at 200 dollars, which is a fair saving compared to the UK.
200 dollars = 160.49 pounds, plus 20% vat = £192.59 UK retail. A 6600 could be £200 which would be a better price than even the Nvidia 760 retailed at and a bargain relatively speaking. As I live between the UK and USA I might well buy my next gpu in the USA instead of the UK at these price differences
 
Last edited:
Oh no its back.. must have breached the containment of the cpu section.

Someone modded a 3070 to have 16GB VRAM, impressive uplift.


If only the factory could have put more on in the first place! :cry:
 
Last edited:

Let’s start the graphics card week with today’s review of an RTX 4070 from Palit and an information that I also got confirmed in the meantime: NVIDIA will stop supplying its board partners for a few weeks. In the previous news, there was usually explicit talk about the GeForce RTX 4070, which is now also the case for the GeForce RTX 4080 in a similar form. This doesn’t mean that NVIDIA might stop making chips, but that board partners are complaining that there are too many cards both in the channel and in factories.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom