Feel free to buy the last generationThat's because its basically the 4060 engine in a 4070 chassis.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Feel free to buy the last generationThat's because its basically the 4060 engine in a 4070 chassis.
It's really hard to recommend the RTX 4090 to anyone, except if money is no object. It's just 25% more powerful than the already overpriced RTX 4080.
The 4090 TI will be a better option anyway, if people are going to spend that kind of money, although trading in an RTX 4090 would be easy to do at places like CEX. But it may be another year before they announce that card. Probably RTX 4080 or 4070 TI > RTX 4090 TI would be a more worthwhile upgrade.
In terms of shaders, there's a 12.5% increase between the RTX 4090 (16384 shaders) and the maximum possible amount on AD102 (18432).
There is also cost cutting going on. They are using a smaller 106 die for the 70 class instead of a 104 and 192 bus instead of 256.Well inflation is apparently going to come down a lot by the end of the year, so they won't won't be able to blame high prices on that anymore...
There's other factors too like the cost of fabricating 5nm GPUs, additional L2 cache, increased VRAM amount, type of VRAM, and the coolers themselves, but these things shouldn't lead to ~a 50% price increase, as some have suggested ($500 to $750).
There is also cost cutting going on. They are using a smaller 106 die for the 70 class instead of a 104 and 192 bus instead of 256.
Last gen the 3070 matched the halo Turing card in performance with the 3070ti beating it by 5-10% yet this time the 4070ti is 5% slower and the 4070 is only rumoured to only match a 3080 so its insulting that they are asking more money for less than the traditional performance level that 70 class cards offered.
If Nvidia want to push up the prices then they need to be backing it up with big performance gains but so far 4090 aside its been a rather weak generation at best.
Well, I don't know about below the RTX 4070, couldn't give a toss because I don't think they will be worth upgrading to (unless playing games on a 1080p monitor). The RTX 3060 TI (or 6700 XT) still performs very well at 1080p, though so an upgrade would be questionable.There is also cost cutting going on. They are using a smaller 106 die for the 70 class instead of a 104 and 192 bus instead of 256.
There is also cost cutting going on. They are using a smaller 106 die for the 70 class instead of a 104 and 192 bus instead of 256.
Last gen the 3070 matched the halo Turing card in performance with the 3070ti beating it by 5-10% yet this time the 4070ti is 5% slower and the 4070 is only rumoured to only match a 3080 so its insulting that they are asking more money for less than the traditional performance level that 70 class cards offered.
If Nvidia want to push up the prices then they need to be backing it up with big performance gains but so far 4090 aside its been a rather weak generation at best.
I feel like there is a bit of a misunderstanding of inflation going on, its a measure of increase in prices from the same month the year before, even 0% inflation means prices will remain high, deflation is the only way prices drop. The other important metric is average wage increase, if the average wage increase is 5% and so is inflation things essentially are worth the same (as a percentage of your income). Nvidia are simply looking at raster performance and lining up cards of this generation and last in order and pricing each one progressively higher, Moores laws is dead as Jenson said, basically what he meant was don't expect free performance boosts each node drop.