Russell Brand.

Hades said:
No I have not disagreed with myself. You originally asked a very black and white question about ages to which I answered that they seemed iffy. Look up the definition of iffy. It means uncertain. So I then pressed you for more information so I could make a more informed decision.

Iffy does not mean the same as creepy. Please look up what they mean.
Click to expand...

Check the MeToo thread, FoxEye thinks it’s ok for men who are almost 40 to groom children because it’s “legal”.

He needs his hard drive checking and probably isn’t worth discussing anything with, especially when it comes to women, children, sex, and consent.
 
Hades said:
No I have not disagreed with myself. You originally asked a very black and white question about ages to which I answered that they seemed iffy. Look up the definition of iffy. It means uncertain. So I then pressed you for more information so I could make a more informed decision.

Iffy does not mean the same as creepy. Please look up what they mean.
Click to expand...
The word "iffy" has multiple meanings, but I will accept that you didn't mean it in the way I interpreted it.

Iffy can also mean "bad" or "unsuitable".

dictionary.cambridge.org

iffy

1. not certain or decided: 2. not completely good, honest, or suitable: 3…
dictionary.cambridge.org dictionary.cambridge.org
 
FoxEye said:
It's quite dishonest on your part to strongly imply something and then follow up with, "Actually, I never said that."

The implication of your first post (quoted 2nd) here is fairly obvious.
Click to expand...

Please show me where I’ve said he definitely raped someone, is guilty and deserves punishment already.

I am more than willing to hear his defence, and am perfectly within my rights to think he may have, or even may have probably done something, without saying he definitively has for sure, especially this early on in process.

You on the other hand are trying to defend Justin Roland in another thread, so should probably not be posting here any longer, but I don’t think it’s against the rules to be pro child sexual grooming.
 
hurfdurf said:
Check the MeToo thread, FoxEye thinks it’s ok for men who are almost 40 to groom children because it’s “legal”.

He needs his hard drive checking and probably isn’t worth discussing anything with, especially when it comes to women, children, sex, and consent.
Click to expand...
Your definition of grooming is quite broad tho, isn't it. It's a good job you're not making the laws of this country, is all I can say.

I suspect there would only be a handful of the most feminist men not languishing in prison.

e: Especially given how you seem to have decided OcUK is a bastion of "people who hate women". Your something of an extremist.
 
Last edited:
FoxEye said:
Your definition of grooming is quite broad tho, isn't it. It's a good job you're not making the laws of this country, is all I can say.

I suspect there would only be a handful of the most feminist men not languishing in prison.
Click to expand...

The age of consent is 16 because 16 year olds bang each other, not because it's ok to have a girlfriend in year 10 when you're 42.

I would like to thank all the men in this conversation for bravely outing themselves as nonces. You have been noted.

Thank you for joining the suss nonce line. You are number 7039 in the queue. To be prioritised, please go into detail as to why a girl doing her GCSEs is an ideal sexual partner and why you think all men think the same way you do.
 
FoxEye said:
The word "iffy" has multiple meanings, but I will accept that you didn't mean it in the way I interpreted it.

Iffy can also mean "bad" or "unsuitable".

dictionary.cambridge.org

iffy

1. not certain or decided: 2. not completely good, honest, or suitable: 3…
dictionary.cambridge.org dictionary.cambridge.org
Click to expand...
I'm aware of the slang meaning of the word.
 
hurfdurf said:
The age of consent is 16 because 16 year olds bang each other, not because it's ok to have a girlfriend in year 10 when you're 42.

I would like to thank all the men in this conversation for bravely outing themselves as nonces. You have been noted.

Thank you for joining the suss nonce line. You are number 7039 in the queue. To be prioritised, please go into detail as to why a girl doing her GCSEs is an ideal sexual partner and why you think all men think the same way you do.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you'd like to explain how a 16 yo girl is necessarily always a victim, any time she has sex with an adult male?

Out of curiosity, maybe you would like to volunteer the maximum acceptable age for the male partner of a 16 yo girl?
And what if the sexes were reversed?
Could you also specify please the maximum age of the female partner for a 16 yo guy?
 
FoxEye said:
Perhaps you'd like to explain how a 16 yo girl is necessarily always a victim, any time she has sex with an adult male?

Out of curiosity, maybe you would like to volunteer the maximum acceptable age for the male partner of a 16 yo girl?
And what if the sexes were reversed?
Could you also specify please the maximum age of the female partner for a 16 yo guy?
Click to expand...

You really really want to be able to have a conversation where you can attempt to justify grooming children don’t you? Sorry. I’m not enabling that for you.
 
hurfdurf said:
You really really want to be able to have a conversation where you can attempt to justify grooming children don’t you? Sorry. I’m not enabling that for you.
Click to expand...
You know that's a huge cop-out, don't you?

So it's enough for you to make accusations and suggest someone should be cancelled/banned/arrested, and then that's job done, and you've made your decree, and it's off to spread the gospel of feminism somewhere else.

Meanwhile the accused has no right of reply. Certainly not to ask questions of his accuser.
 
Nelly said:

Discover popular videos | Facebook

Video is the place to enjoy videos and shows together. Watch the latest reels, discover original shows and catch up with your favourite creators.
fb.watch fb.watch
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=329601652850583
Click to expand...

Brand is now "right wing" because he exposes big pharma, big tech, corporations that are running the world and the central banking system? :cry:

These all sounds like institutions typically despised by the left.

The definition of right/left wing seems to have been reduced too... are you or are not a conspiracy theory believing moron who "does his research" using highly questionable sources.
 
Last edited:
FoxEye said:
You know that's a huge cop-out, don't you?

So it's enough for you to make accusations and suggest someone should be cancelled/banned/arrested, and then that's job done, and you've made your decree, and it's off to spread the gospel of feminism somewhere else.

Meanwhile the accused has no right of reply. Certainly not to ask questions of his accuser.
Click to expand...

Feel free to ask something relevant to my pointing out of what you yourself have said.

I’m not giving to discuss things beyond that with you. You’ve outed yourself as being pro nonce in one situation, you asking where I draw the nonce line in other circumstances isn’t relevant to that.
 
hurfdurf said:
Feel free to ask something relevant to my pointing out of what you yourself have said.

I’m not giving to discuss things beyond that with you. You’ve outed yourself as being pro nonce in one situation, you asking where I draw the nonce line in other circumstances isn’t relevant to that.
Click to expand...
Not much point in my asking you anything, to be honest. All you want to do is break the forum record for most uses of the word "nonce" in a single thread.

It's amusing that you get to accuse the majority of the posters here of being women-haters and pro child abuse, and then think that your self-proclaimed moral superiority makes you above answering questions, defending your position or justifying your accusations. It's brilliant comedy. It must be, because you can't believe all the pap you spout. Nobody is that far gone.
 
FoxEye said:
Not much point in my asking you anything, to be honest. All you want to do is break the forum record for most uses of the word "nonce" in a single thread.

It's amusing that you get to accuse the majority of the posters here of being women-haters and pro child abuse, and then think that your self-proclaimed moral superiority makes you above answering questions, defending your position or justifying your accusations. It's brilliant comedy. It must be, because you can't believe all the pap you spout. Nobody is that far gone.
Click to expand...


“Truly you cannot believe yourself when you quote what I’ve said and say I said it?!

You utter mad man. Please debate me.”
 
hurfdurf said:
Check the MeToo thread, FoxEye thinks it’s ok for men who are almost 40 to groom children because it’s “legal”.

He needs his hard drive checking and probably isn’t worth discussing anything with, especially when it comes to women, children, sex, and consent.
Click to expand...
Going back to this... grooming isn't legal.

And nobody said they thought grooming was OK.

It's just you, endlessly stood on your soap box, screaming "Nonce!" into the wind. Hey, whatever gets you through the day.
 
Never really cared for him tbh, I didn't think he was funny and thought he was massively overrated and an arrogant knob.

Saying that it's scary to see someone's career get torn to shreds and companies dropping him just because of an allegation with nothing proven.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom