Deleted member 258511
D
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Poll: Ryzen 7950X3D, 7900X3D, 7800X3D
- Thread starter kindai
- Start date
I don't practice what I preach but I think if you are struggling to justify it then it's a clear sign you don't need (but may want). Perhaps stick with what you got and let's see what the next ones are like if they stick with AM5.
Deleted member 258511
D
Deleted member 258511
Not that I know of. The memory is sweet as a nut though.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2003
- Posts
- 6,974
- Location
- Redcar
Yeah good advice mate. To be honest I game at 4k on a 120fps screen and with a controller so more than likely I wouldn't notice much if any of a difference. More just the idea of having a 6 core than the actual performance which I feel is excellent. Interestingly on Tech Power Ups 7600x 4k results I was getting an extra 10fps+ than what they were saying they got on a 7600x, so possibly drivers have improved since they originally tested it last year, closing the gap even more.
I mean I'm still going to be spending likely 500 on a NV7 case and 12 D30 fans so it's not like I'm not investing lol.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,336
- Location
- Planet Earth
I would appreciate if any of the X3D owners could run this benchmark:
forums.overclockers.co.uk
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D was almost top of the chart,and the Ryzen 7 7950X was a big improvement over the Zen3 parts too.
Fallout 4 CPU benchmark thread(need some Zen3 and Zen4 results!)
Background A few of us still play some of the old Creation Engine based games such as Fallout 4. Annoyingly a lot of reviewers don't seem to test older games anymore,and these generally benefit the most from better single threaded performance,faster memory speeds,etc. Fallout 4 tends to be...
forums.overclockers.co.uk
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D was almost top of the chart,and the Ryzen 7 7950X was a big improvement over the Zen3 parts too.
@Harshell123
1080P score.
I'll try to give this a go when time allows. I never got round to it with the 7950X.I would appreciate if any of the X3D owners could run this benchmark:
Fallout 4 CPU benchmark thread(need some Zen3 and Zen4 results!)
Background A few of us still play some of the old Creation Engine based games such as Fallout 4. Annoyingly a lot of reviewers don't seem to test older games anymore,and these generally benefit the most from better single threaded performance,faster memory speeds,etc. Fallout 4 tends to be...
The Ryzen 7 5800X3D was almost top of the chart,and the Ryzen 7 7950X was a big improvement over the Zen3 parts too.
Last edited:
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
@LtMatt mind doing a quick 4090 run with 1080p lowest for sottr? leave 4090 stock please.
If you had asked me 30 minutes ago, yes. Now no.
I'll try and remember to do it when the 4090 is back in the system.
What do you score at 1080P Robert?
I did post some 7900 XTX stock results @Robert896r1 at 1080P lowest earlier in the thread if that's any good to you for now.If you had asked me 30 minutes ago, yes. Now no.
I'll try and remember to do it when the 4090 is back in the system.
What do you score at 1080P Robert?
And here's a 720P result.
Last edited:
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
It scores differently with a 4090 vs 7900xtx on the cpu front. Mine is quite low in the mid 300's since it's 13600k. It's one the best benches for x3d in general.
mainly wanted to compare it since my old 5800x3d was around 400 and this seems closer to 430 on nvidia.
mainly wanted to compare it since my old 5800x3d was around 400 and this seems closer to 430 on nvidia.
Yes if you look at my results in the SOTTR bench thread the 4090 is in the 430 range. Nvidia's driver overhead holds it back a bit or it would be higher like with the XTX runs.
3D center performance summary from review data, average gaming performance results from 16 reviews at 1080p
| Cores | 8C | 8C | 12C | 16C | 6C+8c | 8C+8c | 8C+16c | 8C+16c | 12C | 16C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DCenter.org | 5800X3D | 7700X | 7900X | 7950X | 13600K | 13700K | 13900K | 13900KS | 7900X3D | 7950X3D |
| ASCII | 90.4% | – | – | 100.4% | – | – | 100% | – | – | 110.2% |
| CB #1: RTX4090 | 82.9% | 86.2% | 86.4% | 87.6% | 89.8% | 96.6% | 100% | 100.5% | – | 103.9% |
| CB #2: 7900XTX | 90.0% | 91.9% | 90.8% | 91.5% | 93.0% | 97.6% | 100% | 100.8% | – | 107.3% |
| EG #1: DDR5/5200 | 80.4% | 89.6% | 89.8% | 92.1% | 93.1% | – | 100% | – | – | 98.2% |
| EG #2: DDR5/6000 | 77.4% | 89.4% | 91.9% | 94.6% | 92.9% | – | 100% | – | – | 101.0% |
| Gamer’s Nexus | 81.9% | 85.5% | 83.8% | 86.9% | 91.3% | 99.9% | 100% | – | 90.3% | 97.9% |
| GameStar | 91.1% | – | 98.5% | – | – | – | 100% | – | – | 102.9% |
| Golem | 63.2% | – | – | 80.1% | – | – | 100% | – | – | 99.0% |
| hardwareluxx | 95.3% | 87.4% | 88.2% | 89.5% | 95.1% | 98.8% | 100% | – | – | 110.4% |
| Igor’s Lab | 79.1% | 73.2% | 77.5% | 81.5% | 91.0% | 98.9% | 100% | – | – | 100.3% |
| Paul’s hardware | 86.9% | – | – | 98.0% | – | – | 100% | – | – | 104.6% |
| PC games hardware | 85.8% | 78.7% | 80.6% | 81.7% | 91.2% | 96.7% | 100% | 101.5% | 98.3% | 106.2% |
| PurePC | 80.1% | 78.7% | 83.9% | 85.5% | 91.4% | – | 100% | – | – | 102.6% |
| Quasar zone | 87.5% | 89.8% | 91.7% | 94.0% | 91.2% | 96.6% | 100% | 101.1% | – | 103.1% |
| TechPowerUp | 84.0% | 86.9% | 87.4% | 87.7% | 91.3% | 96.6% | 100% | – | – | 101.6% |
| TechSpot | 84.7% | 96.2% | 94.9% | 95.5% | 91.1% | 94.9% | 100% | 101.3% | – | 103.2% |
| Tom’s hardware | 91.3% | 80.4% | 86.2% | 88.4% | – | 102.9% | 100% | 103.6% | – | 110.9% |
| Tweakers | 89.5% | – | 93.5% | 91.9% | 96.9% | 103.5% | 100% | 101.0% | 98.1% | 96.9% |
| AVG Game Perf. | 84.9% | 87.8% | 89.1% | 90.6% | 91.8% | 97.3% | 100% | 101.1% | – | 103.8% |
| Power limit | 142W | 230W | 230W | 230W | 181W | 253W | 253W | 253W | 162W | 162W |
| MSRP | $349 | $349 | $449 | $599 | $319 | $409 | $589 | $699 | $599 | $699 |
| Current Price | 314€ | 343€ | 445€ | 599€ | 337€ | 443€ | €606 | 755€ | 679€ | 789€ |
Last edited:
Deleted member 258511
D
Deleted member 258511
Power consumption is amazing. I think in terms of performance it is what I predicted, neither side are too far ahead. I would be lying if I said I didn’t have doubts about how this 3d and non 3d/gamebar way of doing things will play out (and yes I’ve seen the videos explaining it) but it’s just early days.
Or in other words, Alder Lake and Raptor Lake are at a P4 level of inefficiency!
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,610
- Location
- Liverpool, England
That's what I am thinking of going for (64GB)
Deleted member 258511
D
Deleted member 258511
It’s the one thing they really need to tackle. They simply can’t compete.
While gamers mostly don't care, for their (formerly) super lucrative server market, perf/watt is or should be king.
Intel are lucky that so many server buyers are going by the mantra of "nobody ever got fired for buying
The really big cloud customers (Amazon, Google, Alibaba) are deploying more and more custom ARM chips only using x86 were they have no choice. A perfect nightmare for Intel and yet Intel won't scrap shareholders dividends!
I can personally vouch for either one of these DIMM modules as working well with AM5 CPUs including VCache.
F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5NR - Single Rank 32GB, Hynix M Die good for overclocking
F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5NR Dual Rank 64GB Hynix A Die, great for overclocking
I have the latter and have it running at 6200Mhz C28 at 1.43v 64GB.Prior to that I had the former kit and had it running at 6000Mhz C28 at 1.44v.
Last edited: