Caporegime
Not that i know of, as far as compute goes the 290X was faster.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
** The AMD Navi Thread **
- Thread starter subbytna
- Start date
Not that i know of, as far as compute goes the 290X was faster.
Soldato
It did. Google even auto-completed 290x with 290x hair dryer
What about the endless memes?
I had one but with a dwood bracket and 120mm AIO bolted to it. Good card.
Maxwell was the first Titan that dropped compute support . I think that was the moment Nvidia realize the market could sustain higher prices
Soldato
NV_NAVI10_P_A0 = 1,
NV_NAVI12_P_A0 = 10,
NV_NAVI14_M_A0 = 20,
NV_NAVI21_P_A0 = 40,
NV_NAVI10_LITE_P_A0 = 0x80,
NV_NAVI10_LITE_P_B0 = 0x81,
NV_NAVI12_LITE_P_A0 = 0x82,
NV_NAVI21_LITE_P_A0 = 0x90,
NV_UNKNOWN = 0xFF
Other Navi GPUs.
https://twitter.com/TUM_APISAK/status/1140818866316013568
NV_NAVI12_P_A0 = 10,
NV_NAVI14_M_A0 = 20,
NV_NAVI21_P_A0 = 40,
NV_NAVI10_LITE_P_A0 = 0x80,
NV_NAVI10_LITE_P_B0 = 0x81,
NV_NAVI12_LITE_P_A0 = 0x82,
NV_NAVI21_LITE_P_A0 = 0x90,
NV_UNKNOWN = 0xFF
Other Navi GPUs.
https://twitter.com/TUM_APISAK/status/1140818866316013568
I like AMD's TressFX much better:
Well, AMD simultaneously launched R9 Fury X and R9 390X in June 2015 to combat GTX 980 and GTX 980 Ti and they successfully managed to do so:
Caporegime
It did. Google even auto-completed 290x with 290x hair dryer
What about the endless memes?
I had one but with a dwood bracket and 120mm AIO bolted to it. Good card.
I think a bunch of brand snobs trolling AMD are only persuading themselves.
Caporegime
This is the plague of the modern times, unfortunately. What happens to people?!
You get it on all sides.
On a side note HUB made a video a couple of days ago, one he wouldn't normally make but it was so prevalent he decided to address it, a lot of people responded to his '1600 vs 7600K two years on' video said it was a paid AMD video or that he was shilling for AMD because in the video the 1600 was clearly "the better gaming CPU" i mean he predicted this would happen two years ago, its also why i made that choice as i could see it already in my 4690K, to me it just goes to show how stupid people can be, as he pointed out Ryzen was not Bulldozer and had vastly more CPU resources than the 7600K, it was almost inevitable to happen with subsequent games.
Soldato
LITE are low power for consoles etc.
M is mobile
P performance.
10/20/40 are the CUs.
And just because lets speculate, NV_NAVI21_LITE_P_A0 = Spectre?
How can it be AMD-sponsored when a simple quad-core without HT isn't good enough anymore?!
The real issue is that AMD have had an inferior architecture for a decade. And still do.
You can't blame punters for seeing what's in front of them, and not touching it with a 10' pole.
Or you can, but then everyone else gets to see your AMD campaign medals proudly pinned to your bosom.
Associate
When it comes to graphics cards, punters tend to plonk their cash down without much thought. Why do you think we now have cards priced at more than £1,000?
The vast, vast majority aren't buying those...
Yes but it takes a decade time for this kind of performance to reach the vast majority of the masses.
All I was saying is that we all recognise nVidia has had the superior architecture for a long, long time now. So why blame punters for not buying AMD?
AMD in the graphics space have been the architects of their own downfall. They've also many times shot themselves in the foot with their marketing. We all know this.
So why blame punters for acting rationally and avoiding AMD GPUs?
AMD in the graphics space have been the architects of their own downfall. They've also many times shot themselves in the foot with their marketing. We all know this.
So why blame punters for acting rationally and avoiding AMD GPUs?
Associate
True, but when you set the upper limits so high, then everything else moves up a notch. When something is normalised, then perceptions change.
I remember buying the GeForce 9800 GX2 back in '08, which was retailing at around £435 (around £570 today if you account for inflation), and if I remember correctly it was one of the fastest cards on the market at that time. Fast forward 11 years, and the fastest card on the market today will set you back close to £1,000 or higher!
Soldato
What are you smoking? AMD has competitive cards and prices on anything except the halo product.
Or you want people buy more GTX1650?
I said AMD had the inferior architecture for a long time. And still do.
Are you disputing that?
Would you like to claim that AMD's architecture is at least on terms with nVidia's architecture? Yes?
Soldato
Nvidia has superior architecture on what? DX11 only?
How about DX12, Async Compute and Vulcan? Even TimeSpy has special pipeline optimization to run on Nvidia cards without showing poor performance. Something that cannot be hidden in games even today with Turing. Have you seen the abysmal performance of the 2080Ti in Vulcan games?
That's the superior architecture? Cutting corners like Intel does, albeit the latter allowing security holes because is CPU?
Soldato
mmmm, whats that standard DX12 benchmark? Ah yes Timespy, which cards dominate? 'special optimisation' more like Panos clutching at straws again...
