The Banter Thread

CliffyBiro · 13 May 2011 at 00:22

Just expose Wright-Phillips to Gamma rays.

Rameses · 13 May 2011 at 00:26

skippi90 said:
Just expose Wright-Phillips to Gamma rays.

Biz.Kid09 · 13 May 2011 at 08:18

G|mp said:
You've slagged him off a lot but would quite happily see him come back?

You disgust me seriously, it is only because you are 1, young and 2, a bit stupid that I don't rip you a new one and reduce you to tears.

You are so removed from what a true City fan is it's unbelievable.

Yes. I was slagging him off when he was not playing well. This was probably because of Mancini. So if he can fix his problem with him then he may get back to his old form.
Likewise, rip me a new one? hahahahahahahahah.
Oh yeah.

G|mp · 13 May 2011 at 08:29

Have you finished editing?

Shamikebab · 13 May 2011 at 09:02

lol legal issues, never seen that before

G|mp · 13 May 2011 at 09:35

Shamikebab said:
lol legal issues, never seen that before

Because they are normally deleted

Azza · 13 May 2011 at 11:41

lol City fans

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ams-FA-cup-victory--theyve-lifted-trophy.html

Tummy · 13 May 2011 at 12:14

Biz.Kid09 said:
Yes. I was slagging him off when he was not playing well. This was probably because of Mancini. So if he can fix his problem with him then he may get back to his old form.
Likewise, rip me a new one? hahahahahahahahah.
Oh yeah.

Sounds like fighting talk.

Robbo · 13 May 2011 at 13:30

Tummy said:
Sounds like fighting talk.

Go on, hit him.

Azza · 13 May 2011 at 13:33

Weebull · 13 May 2011 at 13:40

OcUK's been super-injunctioned. :O

Purdy · 13 May 2011 at 13:52

G|mp said:
Because they are normally deleted

Any chance you or someone else can pm me why it's illegal to discuss that 0.o

K1LLSW1TCH · 13 May 2011 at 14:08

Biz.Kid09 said:
Yes. I was slagging him off when he was not playing well. This was probably because of Mancini.

Oh come on, it's not Mancini's fault that Adebayor is crap. He tried for a season at Arsenal and then gave up, the same as at City he gave about half a season worth of effort and then gave up. Speaking of strikers, what happened to Jo who you paid 18 million for only a season or two ago?

BaZ87 · 13 May 2011 at 14:27

Purdy said:
Any chance you or someone else can pm me why it's illegal to discuss that 0.o

Because there's been a super injunction and ocuk could get in trouble.

Purdy · 13 May 2011 at 14:39

BaZ87 said:
Because there's been a super injunction and ocuk could get in trouble.

Super injunctions can stop random people talking about whatever they want?

CliffyBiro · 13 May 2011 at 14:41

Purdy said:
Super injunctions can stop random people talking about whatever they want?

No, but they can stop the discussion of it on all manner of publishing media, up to and including forums.

Rotty · 13 May 2011 at 14:44

You aren't even allowed to post that you kn ow there is s super injunction

and yes an injunction isn't just against one person it is agaonst anyone who knows anything, by posting such information you could be held in contempt of court and maybe OcUK could get into trouble

CliffyBiro · 13 May 2011 at 14:48

Rotty said:
You aren't even allowed to post that you kn ow there is s super injunction

Surely you can if you don't suggest who it's for/what it's about?

Otherwise nobody would ever mention the words 'Super injunction'.

Purdy · 13 May 2011 at 14:51

Couldn't you just claim you are speculating what it is about rather than actually knowing anything about it?
Either way it is pretty dumb in the case of whatever this one may be

Rotty · 13 May 2011 at 15:00

Purdy said:
Couldn't you just claim you are speculating what it is about rather than actually knowing anything about it?

no