• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD***

okay ill try them thanks^^
how many maps this game got on release any1 know?
i kinda want new maps alrdy, and less range on them dam rockets :p
 
Mei said:
okay ill try them thanks^^
how many maps this game got on release any1 know?
i kinda want new maps alrdy, and less range on them dam rockets :p
Click to expand...

10 maps (excluding future DLC) and 10 different games modes i think Mei. There is also a gamemode called capture the Bieber.
 
Is there a Timedemo we can use to compare FPS?

Otherwise this whole idea is a load of old BS!

Also I was playing at 1680x1050 - High preset settings and I could manage roughly 30fps. Playable, but certainly not optimal.

I guess my rig is really starting to show its age!
 
Last edited:
Alkalinepro5 said:
Is there a Timedemo we can use to compare FPS?

Otherwise this whole idea is a load of old BS!
Click to expand...

Negatory, but we can hope they include a timedemo in the final release. BF3 did have one, but in their infinite wisdom Dice decided to remove it from the final build.
 
Nope, no time demo/benchmark tool. And i dont expect to see one in the final release version. On bf3, all the review sites had to use the op swordbreaker level for benching.

@Matt, could they not give extra points for killing the Bieber.
 
Even if they had a built in benchmark, wouldn't that be rendered slightly irrelevant for comparing to multiplayer online performance?

Unless there's a way to simulate that kind of cpu strain. C'mon techies, help me out here.
 
Uncle Petey said:
Even if they had a built in benchmark, wouldn't that be rendered a little irrelevant for comparing to 64 player online performance?

Unless there's a way to simulate that kind of cpu strain. C'mon techies, help me out here.
Click to expand...

I hear you but we want a consistent, gpu stressing benchmark. The cpu part is not half as important, though it would be nice if they could include that part in it as well. Maybe have loads of buildings falling down or something. I hope they put some effort in to it.
 
Last edited:
Final results from me from this beta. Windows 8 offers the best performance by far.

Full round on 64 man Conquest UK server. Minimum frame rate of above 60 FPS and an average of 114 FPS :) Barely ever dips below 80.


9x3f.png


i3nm.png
 
Last edited:
MjFrosty said:
Final results from me from this beta. Windows 8 offers the best performance by far.

Full round on 64 man Conquest UK server. Minimum frame rate of above 60 FPS and an average of 114 FPS :) Barely ever dips below 80.

SNIP
Click to expand...

Good stuff Frosty.

1080p ultra+4xAA right? Tri SLI titans? 64 Man conquest or 32 man dominations? Tank whoring or on foot? What FOV?

I will run a 7950 crossfire comparison tomorrow.
 
LtMatt said:
Good stuff Frosty.

1080p ultra+4xAA right? Tri SLI titans? 64 Man conquest or 32 man dominations? Tank whoring or on foot? What FOV?

I will run a 7950 crossfire comparison tomorrow.
Click to expand...




80 something FOV, just jumped it slightly. Full 64 man conquest 1080P Ultra with 4XAA yep.

All on foot with some brief ground and air travelling but 90% running and gunning as engineer :)
 
MjFrosty said:
80 something FOV, just jumped it slightly. Full 64 man conquest 1080P Ultra with 4XAA yep.

All on foot with some brief ground and air travelling but 90% running and gunning as engineer :)
Click to expand...

Cool beans will get some comparisons up tomorrow.

Goes to show how demanding this damn game is that tri SLI titans will only average 114fps at 1080p. Crazy. :eek:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom