• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD***

As promised... Single Titan results. Not sure how these are to be compared to my original results as that was before the most recent 54MB patch.

Full 64 Man Conquest. The min drop I'm assuming was the tank exploding in front of my face whilst the sky scraper came tumbling down. :D

Game uses no more than 3GB RAM for those saying they were having memory leaks. VRAM usage still around the same at max @ 2300MB.

dg8c.png


1ve4.png


With the same patch SLi enabled. 1080P is honestly a serious CPU bottleneck for 3 Titans. This kind of usage is the same for most highly strung games at this resolution. CPU usage taps out at a max of 50%

bjgu.png


zwvl.png


Note the low minimum with this patch. I'm not sure where it got this from in all honesty so take it with some salt as I can't remember if this was the one I'd lapped over with.

3xzl.png


bkvl.png


fsik.png
 
Last edited:
MjFrosty said:
As promised... Single Titan results. Not sure how these are to be compared to my original results as that was before the most recent 54MB patch.

SNIP
Click to expand...

Thanks Frosty. Good results nonetheless. :cool:

I was right in my original comment.

LtMatt said:
I don't believe you'll find a single card currently (290X or a titan) that in all situations at 1080p or higher at the highest details will be able to keep minimum FPS at 55-60 or over at all times. Maybe with a more polished game or drivers its possible but not currently. The game is pretty hard on gpu's atm.
Click to expand...

I'm actually surprised at how much more demanding this game is over BF3 tbh.
 
I could probably do another round and average higher. I think I did. Also the SLi results produced a similar minimum. Thats a 20 minute stint don't forget, so a one time quick nudge down to 20fps isn't the end of the world.

I will say though I do tend to agree that its pretty easy to go below 50 fps with a single GPU. Just depends how crazy things get :)
 
Rusty0611 said:
So Greg's doesn't count? You do like cherry picking. Neither are invalid results but you can't just write off peoples results because they don't fall in line with what you believe.
Click to expand...

You need to actually read what i said.

LtMatt said:
That's fine Greg but you need to read what i said with my original comment. You took it out of context. My original comment stands and is correct but you took that as i was accusing you of lying. As i said i never doubt that in your 5 minute runs your results are accurate. I'm talking about the bigger picture in all situations. I don't believe one single card has the grunt to maintain 55-60fps at all times.
Click to expand...

If Greg managed to cover all situations in that 5 minute bench then great. I think we all know thats not the case though.

I'm sure if you try hard enough you can avoid the brief drops to low fps by avoiding the incidents that cause it to happen in the first place. But then thats going against exactly what i said.

MjFrosty said:
I will say though I do tend to agree that its pretty easy to go below 50 fps with a single GPU. Just depends how crazy things get :)
Click to expand...

Agreed. Some people just like an argument over nothing. ;)
 
LtMatt said:
If Greg managed to cover all situations in that 5 minute bench then great. I think we all know thats not the case though.

I'm sure if you try hard enough you can avoid the brief drops to low fps by avoiding the incidents that cause it to happen in the first place. But then thats going against exactly what i said.
Click to expand...

Unless said otherwise I'd trust Gregster to get in everything that makes it a representative section of gameplay. As I said with my heart rate example, just because it's a shorter sample doesn't mean that the results are not as useful as a full map run.
 
Rusty0611 said:
Unless said otherwise I'd trust Gregster to get in everything that makes it a representative section of gameplay. As I said with my heart rate example, just because it's a shorter sample doesn't mean that the results are not as useful as a full map run.
Click to expand...

I'm not talking about one persons opinion of a representative section of gameplay though. I think that's been pretty obvious since the start with my first quote.

LtMatt said:
I don't believe you'll find a single card currently (290X or a titan) that in all situations at 1080p or higher at the highest details will be able to keep minimum FPS at 55-60 or over at all times. Maybe with a more polished game or drivers its possible but not currently. The game is pretty hard on gpu's atm.
Click to expand...

LtMatt said:
As we can see from the Gamegpu graph a 7990's minimum fps in BF4 are much higher than a titan in BF4. Yet even the 7990 will see that sort of drop during those intense explosions. I find it hard to believe a titan won't see that as well. Of course it will. ;)

I'm sure for 99.9% of the time it will be above that though obviously, but this is worst case scenario here.
Click to expand...

Gregster said:
Well my results say different and your opinion is duly noted.
Click to expand...
 
None of which has any reference to a representative slice of gameplay? As I said, I would trust Gregster to capture this as he's not exactly a newb (well he is at BF4 but that's a different story :p).

I just think you're just too bothered about being right or wrong. There is a grey area still :).
 
Rusty0611 said:
None of which has any reference to a representative slice of gameplay? As I said, I would trust Gregster to capture this as he's not exactly a newb (well he is at BF4 but that's a different story :p).

I just think you're just too bothered about being right or wrong. There is a grey area still :).
Click to expand...

I never said it did, nor was it meant to. This was simply that no single gpu can keep it above 60 fps at all times in the most intense parts of the game, as per my first quote. As has been noted by Frosty, triggering these events its quite easy to make the fps drop below that limit.
 
Last edited:
LtMatt said:
I never said it did, nor was it meant to. This was simply that no single gpu can keep it above 60 fps at all times in the most intense parts of the game, as per my first quote. As has been noted by Frosty, triggering these events its quite easy to make the fps drop below that limit.
Click to expand...

its something to debate i guess, only ronnies animal crackers on tv
i think thats right, at this minute 1 gpu cant on them settings, in all situations, but updates are improving the game, in 2months time even a 280x with a i5 could...maybe

i dont like crossfire or sli much bcos i play some weird old games, so it does matter to me that they start making some better gpu's
 
Mei said:
its something to debate i guess, only ronnies animal crackers on tv
i think thats right, at this minute 1 gpu cant on them settings, in all situations, but updates are improving the game, in 2months time even a 280x with a i5 could...maybe

i dont like crossfire or sli much bcos i play some weird old games, so it does matter to me that they start making some better gpu's
Click to expand...

Aye that's what i said.

Speaking of crossfire im trying to get it working on Dead Space 1. Anyone remember that game? Pretty cool game, creepy as hell with headphones on. It doesn't appear to have a working crossfire profile so im creating my own. Am using Alternate Frame Rendering so far. Got 99% on gpu1 but only 50% on gpu 2. It runs smooth but id like to see 99% on gpu2 or slightly higher usage if i could.

Open to suggestions. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom