• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD***

Kaapstad said:
What do the settings above mean, what resolution are they equivalent to ?

Thanks.
Click to expand...

From what I've read its 200% of your native resolution, so 1600p x 2, which iirc is around 4K.

In other words 4 x 290X's are holding up very very nicely at BF4 ultra 4K :)

Edit: Matts right, its ABOVE 4K, even more impressive.

Edit 2: Or does it not go by pixel count? 1600p is roughly 4m pixels, 4K is around 8m pixels...200% of 4m pixels is 8m...:confused: ******* maths on a Saturday evening, what has my life become :(
 
Last edited:
pgi947 said:
From what I've read its 200% of your native resolution, so 1600p x 2, which iirc is around 4K.

In other words 4 x 290X's are holding up very very nicely at BF4 ultra 4K :)

Edit: Matts right, its ABOVE 4K, even more impressive.

Edit 2: Or does it not go by pixel count? 1600p is roughly 4m pixels, 4K is around 8m pixels...200% of 4m pixels is 8m...:confused: ******* maths on a Saturday evening, what has my life become :(
Click to expand...

Just been reading on another forum, I think it is as LtMatt says it is 200% of the settings so 5120 x 3200.

Going by the FPS it is the same as using a single 290X @1600p
 
thefogo said:
Is that those Phantoms?
Click to expand...

Yep!

whyscotty said:
Bless you my child :D
Click to expand...

Ok so 2560x1440 200% ultra (HBAO, 4xMSAA and all that jazz)...I tested using the testing range, so you can probably slash another 10-15% from these results to give indication of a busy 64 man server.

f6w.png


200% I ran out of VRam near instantly, turning it into a slide show, it reported it was running arounf 30-40FPS but felt more like 10-15 fps.

Even dropping MSAA to 2x and HBAO to SSAO and Post to medium it STILL ran out of vram.

Vram limit hit at around 175% scaling, though at 150% it still hit around 2.9GB so you have to feel on a regular map it would still burst through the vram wall.

Regular 1440p 100% ultra was perfectly fine, frame rates sitting in the 140+ region, Vram usage at around 2.2GB.

For sure 4K needs bare minimum 4GB cards.

Edit: actually of Matt's about can you run the same test (just ponder about the test range blowing things up) and let us know how your vram looks at 1440 200% ultra? Try see where the drop off point is for vram.
 
Last edited:
pgi947 said:
So:

1080 200% is 3840x2160 (4K)

1440 200% is 5120x2880
1440 150% is 3840x2160 (4K)

Running out of VRam on all 3!

Matts doing some testing now.
Click to expand...

For some reason the scaling using so much more VRAM than the native resolution. Early testing showed that, no idea why :)

It's not indicative of what 4k would actually require, as 3GB cards have been testing and shown working in both SP and MP.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom