• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD***

shankly1985 said:
Yeah! I dont go over 200fps so no need on my system. but you was easy there like. great stuff
Click to expand...

It's been a long time since I've run 1080P, as i had a 1440P screen before this. Part of me wonders what I'd get with three cards... four cards shows little gain even with Mantle. It may remove cpu bottlenecks, but it can't work miracles at 1080P and with four cards running. Good banter though lads. :)
 
AMDMatt said:
It's been a long time since I've run 1080P, as i had a 1440P screen before this. Part of me wonders what I'd get with three cards... four cards shows little gain even with Mantle. It may remove cpu bottlenecks, but it can't work miracles at 1080P and with four cards running. Good banter though lads. :)
Click to expand...

Yeah, I want new monitor badly. I have money ready hoping FreeSync displays drop early or I might just after buy a 1440p 144hz
 
One thing that is evident from the bench runs is how well G-Sync does. It seriously does make a huge difference to smoothness and I couldn't go back to normal screens without kicking and screaming. I have had this G-Sync monitor a couple of months now and you end up taking it for granted untill you play a game on another system and then it hits you hard and you see all the tearing and judders that you previously didn't notice before going G-Sync.

Amazing tech.
 
I'm sure G-sync really is lovely. Hope 'freesync' can provide the same experience for us guys too.

With BF4 though, I've found that keeping fps high generally eliminates screen tearing. Not quite the same thing, but y'know :)
 
Uncle Petey said:
I'm sure G-sync really is lovely. Hope 'freesync' can provide the same experience for us guys too.

With BF4 though, I've found that keeping fps high generally eliminates screen tearing. Not quite the same thing, but y'know :)
Click to expand...

Screen tear dont bother me... What I would like though is playing a game like Crysis 3 on maxed out on my system I dont keep 120fps and you get drops and when it does it can feel sluggish... I hoping FreeSync can smooth these games out.


For everything FPS Battlefield or CSGo etc i'll keep running sync free for that maximum hit detection.
 
Uncle Petey said:
I'm sure G-sync really is lovely. Hope 'freesync' can provide the same experience for us guys too.

With BF4 though, I've found that keeping fps high generally eliminates screen tearing. Not quite the same thing, but y'know :)
Click to expand...

I suck at BF4, so doesn't matter what frames I aim for, as even at 200 fps, I get owned :D

It just makes everything so fluid. Prior to G-Sync, I always felt that my gaming was super smooth and no tearing. Linus and Ryan both were at the nVidia tech thingy and both claimed it as a game changer.... I thought "usual PR hype" but I will go with it and as time went on, I found myself with a very good IPS 1440P and playing games like BF4 was awful. Input lag from slow response times and tearing were really noticeable after coming from a 120Hz Asus. i switched it back to the Asus for BF4 and stuck with the Dell on V-Sync for games like TR (which did look very good on IPS's deep colours.

I then grabbed the Samsung 4K and again, the picture quality was out of this world but tearing was the major problem or input lag with V-Sync. A couple of months later I finally caved in and grabbed the G-Sync ROG Swift and I go back to Linus and Ryan and have to agree that it is a game changer. When the moni manufacturers get Freesync capable monitors out and AMD have the drivers for it, you AMD users are in for a real treat and you will see what your eyes are trying to tell you that you don't see because you won't see it any longer :D
 
Gregster said:
I suck at BF4, so doesn't matter what frames I aim for, as even at 200 fps, I get owned :D

It just makes everything so fluid. Prior to G-Sync, I always felt that my gaming was super smooth and no tearing. Linus and Ryan both were at the nVidia tech thingy and both claimed it as a game changer.... I thought "usual PR hype" but I will go with it and as time went on, I found myself with a very good IPS 1440P and playing games like BF4 was awful. Input lag from slow response times and tearing were really noticeable after coming from a 120Hz Asus. i switched it back to the Asus for BF4 and stuck with the Dell on V-Sync for games like TR (which did look very good on IPS's deep colours.

I then grabbed the Samsung 4K and again, the picture quality was out of this world but tearing was the major problem or input lag with V-Sync. A couple of months later I finally caved in and grabbed the G-Sync ROG Swift and I go back to Linus and Ryan and have to agree that it is a game changer. When the moni manufacturers get Freesync capable monitors out and AMD have the drivers for it, you AMD users are in for a real treat and you will see what your eyes are trying to tell you that you don't see because you won't see it any longer :D
Click to expand...

I don't doubt it mate. I'm sure it really is a night and day thing.
Oh, and I have to confess once more that I'm shockingly bad at this game too. High fps FPS don't do squat for my k/d :D

Personally, I'm torn between 3440 and whatever standard ratio freesync 1440 that comes along, though they'll probably have something that does both at some point. #patience

AMDMatt said:
Soon i will enjoy Crysis 3 at 4K with x8AA with 60+fps. Soon Pete, soon... :cool: With 4GB it's not pretty. :D
Click to expand...

8xAA @4K

I don't wish to anger you or Kaapstad...
:p :p
x0Vg77C.jpg
 
Last edited:
What level is it you are all doing your runs on and how am I supposed to set it all up?

I've not played BF4 for ages.

I presume as I'm using mantle then I need to film it using a GoPro rather than fraps etc?
 
AMDMatt said:
It's been a long time since I've run 1080P, as i had a 1440P screen before this. Part of me wonders what I'd get with three cards... four cards shows little gain even with Mantle. It may remove cpu bottlenecks, but it can't work miracles at 1080P and with four cards running. Good banter though lads. :)
Click to expand...

I run 1080p oversample @ 120hz. 1080p without oversample is like looking at a lego picture ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom