Soldato
No, you can't and I want Arnie back
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
i7 2600k @4.4
I might after keep this CPU back at 4.4ghz didn't think the gap was this much.
Over to you Greg
No, you can't and I want Arnie back
Lol.... ^^^^
I managed to get my CPU stable at 4.8Ghz, but its not ideal, 1.52v, which in its self is not a problem, the problem is my Cooler Master Seidon 120V can't deal with the heat that voltage results in long term.
I need a better cooler...
Can i play? #Flex
=
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkD68H-Sxgk
Sorry for the crappy handheld recording.
Here is mine with my GPUs at 1146Mhz/3758Mhz and stock CPU (3.8Ghz)
Well done Shanks, you have me beat
Nice
See you now have 80fov also.. I didn't know till today having higher FOV draws extra effects on screen.. I knew it was more demanding but never knew you get more lighting.
All good fun
Doesn't increasing FOV change the shape of the picture, IE squeezing more into the same space, so it ends up a bit squashed?
Yeah, if you over do it like some people run 100+ lol 80 or 90fov is the max I would say.. This at 1080p it may change at high res like 100+ at 1440p for example might seem fine.
Matt, why do you keep quoting yourself?
Thought so, i think i tryed it once at 1080P, ended up with a Fish-Eye effect...
try 80fov its the sweet spot.