THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD

Gregster · 13 Dec 2014 at 12:05

It is a cunning ploy by DG to get you on Paracel storm and then get bombarded by his Mortar!!!

pgi947 · 13 Dec 2014 at 12:27

Better that then some corn hole hiding in a bush.

setter · 13 Dec 2014 at 12:35

pgi947 said:
Will have a blast on parcel storm shortly. All in all the game feels quite nice these days

Indeed, its the best I can remember it being. Took long enough though.

LtMatt · 13 Dec 2014 at 12:51

~>Dg<~ said:
paracel storm conquest. and a full 64 map . metro is like 20 fps difference so is shanghi in parts.

pgi947 · 13 Dec 2014 at 13:54

Averages and minimums around the same on parcel force as shanghai, parcel was averaging 113 with a minimum of 70, similar figures for shanghai.

setter · 13 Dec 2014 at 14:12

Good results for 2560x1440. Using 2560x1600 under DSR here, cards coping very nicely with it.

LtMatt · 13 Dec 2014 at 14:18

~>Dg<~ said:
paracel storm conquest. and a full 64 map . metro is like 20 fps difference so is shanghi in parts.

Easy money. :cool:

First things first, I'm bottlenecked (even with Mantle) at 1440P with four gpus. Second thing, wow 1440P looks very low res to me since i got used to 4K. :eek:

1440P

4K - Could only grab storm screenshots I'm afraid

setter · 14 Dec 2014 at 11:50

Parcel storm just now.

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
64462, 600000, 68, 144, 107.437

2560x1600, settings at max.

Think i may have been getting some gpu throttling, had to close afterburner as i was running FRAPS. Dont think custom fan profiles work when ab is closed.

pgi947 · 14 Dec 2014 at 11:52

Looks very similar to my 1440 read outs setter

Edit: vram usage is around 2700mb regardless of map.

setter · 14 Dec 2014 at 11:57

Aye, very close. Still seems that parcel and shanghai are the most demanding. All the newer maps ive tried at 1600 are a bit higher. No option for 1440 under DSR, probably due to this being a 16:10 aspect ratio monitor.

pgi947 · 14 Dec 2014 at 12:05

For 1440 dsr you'd need to set the system resolution at 1920x1080 and scale up from that but the change in AR might make things look odd

setter · 14 Dec 2014 at 12:09

If i can dig out a long enough HDMI cable ill try it on my tv, 32" 1080p set which sits next to the monitor.

pgi947 · 14 Dec 2014 at 12:16

Wouldn't worry about it sets, wouldn't imagine there is a great deal of difference between 1440 and 1600

H@mmer · 16 Dec 2014 at 05:36

Tried my 7990 with ultra texture settings instead of medium after the December 15th BF4 patch and so far Mantle seems to play ok. Just been playing TDM so I don't know how the conquest maps will play.
Maybe DICE have fixed the memory leak, anbody any info on this?

LtMatt · 16 Dec 2014 at 08:03

H@mmer said:
Tried my 7990 with ultra texture settings instead of medium after the December 15th BF4 patch and so far Mantle seems to play ok. Just been playing TDM so I don't know how the conquest maps will play.
Maybe DICE have fixed the memory leak, anbody any info on this?

Correct. Dice quietly fixed the infamous memory leak in the November the 18th patch. Next target is to work on reducing the video memory subscription.

almighty15 · 16 Dec 2014 at 09:24

Don't really benchmark this as I play with V-sync turned on.

But I will say that with GTX970 SLI at 2560x1440 everything on Ultra with 4xMSAA+4xxTrSSAA it's never ever dipped below 60fps v-sync.

Not sure on GPU usage as I don't have afterburner running but reckon I could run a bit of DSR on top of that and still manage a solid 60fps.

~>Dg<~ · 16 Dec 2014 at 10:07

H@mmer said:
Tried my 7990 with ultra texture settings instead of medium after the December 15th BF4 patch and so far Mantle seems to play ok. Just been playing TDM so I don't know how the conquest maps will play.
Maybe DICE have fixed the memory leak, anbody any info on this?

TDM fps is totally different to conquest. sometimes by a large margin.

if you want your true performance go 64 man conquest on shanghi and paracel storm right in middle of action then start benching not on fringes of action like so many do.

ignore lockers and metro maps. the fps on them can be upto 20 fps more than other maps.

MyBrainz · 24 Dec 2014 at 07:19

So my Corsair 16GB DDR3 2133Mhz Vengeance Pro Silver Kit arrived yesterday.

Wow why didnt i do this sooner. BF4 feels so much smoother on higher settings coming from Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz Vengeance. They wernt talking crap when they said higher clocked RAM made the game run better

Of course i had to buy elsewhere cuz OcUK dont have the 16GB Pro Silver Kit in stock anymore.

Btw i have it set at 1T Command Rate. Checked on the net it says 11-11-11-27 2T but running great so far. Even DayZ feels smoother with this RAM.

Happy camper here (not that i camp in BF4) lol

BS Dave · 24 Dec 2014 at 08:21

Good to hear, I've been running samsung greens 4x4 2133 9 10 10 21 1t - still amazing ddr3 - but you never know how much of it's effect in game is hype I could never get them to run 1t with my 2700k though, only on x79

mcleish · 26 Dec 2014 at 10:56

MyBrains said:
So my Corsair 16GB DDR3 2133Mhz Vengeance Pro Silver Kit arrived yesterday.

Wow why didnt i do this sooner. BF4 feels so much smoother on higher settings coming from Corsair 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz Vengeance. They wernt talking crap when they said higher clocked RAM made the game run better

Of course i had to buy elsewhere cuz OcUK dont have the 16GB Pro Silver Kit in stock anymore.

Btw i have it set at 1T Command Rate. Checked on the net it says 11-11-11-27 2T but running great so far. Even DayZ feels smoother with this RAM.

Happy camper here (not that i camp in BF4) lol

Im really interested in this. Im running the with the 1600Mhz Vengeance Ram, with a 3770k and 970 sli. Things feel fine, but when I played on a mates with a similar spec with 2400Mhz ram, everything felt smoother! Does the ram really make a difference? I'm not that clued up on memory, but i've seen conflicting comments.

Competitor rules

***THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD***

THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD