-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
***THE BF4 BENCHMARKS THREAD***
- Thread starter pgi947
- Start date
GG earlier mate.
Associate
- Joined
- 27 May 2007
- Posts
- 1,346
- Location
- Kent
How is the game play better than 3 
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 4,504
- Location
- Wales
Afterburner overlay not working for me either, had to use fraps, anyone know why?
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2002
- Posts
- 2,218
- Location
- Somerset
Just installed the Beta. So I take it there is no benchmark as such - we are just looking at FPS?
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,998
- Location
- Swindon
I was getting @ 40-55FPS @ 1080p at the default game settings with my CF6870.
Come on Gibbo do a real steal deal tomorrow. Might have to part with some cash in exchange for a super duper Gfx card.
Come on Gibbo do a real steal deal tomorrow. Might have to part with some cash in exchange for a super duper Gfx card.
My 7950 is struggling big time
1100mhz 7950 4.6mhz 3570k max settings 90fov
Running round at 40fps
Can anyone confirm this???
It's ok though because you have 3gb of vram
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,224
Just ran it on the Titans @stock
Performance was roughly
Min 70
Ave 120
Max 160
As you can see from the pics the drivers may need some work for 4 way SLI.
Try upping your depth of field to 90 kaap unless 70 is what you usually use, 90 is usually the recommended setting giving you more on screen and you may get some more load through those titans.
Just ran it on the Titans @stock
Performance was roughly
Min 70
Ave 120
Max 160
As you can see from the pics the drivers may need some work for 4 way SLI.
nice! but isnt FOV 70 cheating?^^
& i know this is the gfx card section but id like to know the cpu usage too
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 May 2010
- Posts
- 23,924
- Location
- London
670 + 3570k, I should be good to go right? Ultra settings, 2x msaa?
Hmm might be time for SLI.
Question here is now, whether SLI is actually worth it, as 2Gb cards will get vram bottlenecked.
Hmm might be time for SLI.
Question here is now, whether SLI is actually worth it, as 2Gb cards will get vram bottlenecked.
Last edited:
Would be less than 22FPS if he was running out of VRAM. It's like single digit jumping around all over the shop.
More a question of how much do you want to pay? A 780 is noticeably faster than a 7970 but at a large price premium.
Its not always that though as pcper have discovered. It can also represent itself as stuttering or hitching. I'll ask tommy to dig out the graph and article. 4gb 680 was fine, 2gb 680 was not this was in bf3 at 5780x.
Yes
It's the GPU usage on 4 way SLI @22%.
I am only getting about 22fps @1600p but it's not a vram slide show.
@1080p I am only getting 40fps and the cards are only using 1.8gb of vram
In conclusion the performance is crap at the moment on 4 way gk104s.
I would probably get better performance by disabling SLI.
The Titans are rubbish on 4 way SLI as well but not as bad as the GTX 690s.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,224
Sure way to tell would be to drop aa to 0 and see what the frame rates are. Would be pretty surprised if the titans have sli support and the gtx690's don't as surely that would also effect gtx670/680/770 etc which is a much wider user base. Reading Kaap's post above it does seem that way though. Nvidia dropped the ball big time if this is the case.
They actually run quite evenly @22fps with no big drops or highs.