Damn, thought id have to smuggle you in an arse phone and some spice by now.
I guess it's the same way Joe Bloggs can "No comment" an interview, it can be done but it's not going to be looked at favourably by the judge.Weird that the officers involved can refuse to give statements, probably with zero comeback. Hardly inspires confidence in them.
Weird that the officers involved can refuse to give statements, probably with zero comeback. Hardly inspires confidence in them.
Here is the shocking footage of a maniac lamborghini driver.
Yes, this is the quality of video they sent me. Conveniently with no sound as this would prove I wasnt revving the engine at the lights (those who have seen when I rev the car it violently shakes, and that isnt in the video) and would also mean the police officer lied about it and would then be an unreliable witness and the case would be instantly found in my favor.
2) Is that driving causing, or likely to cause alarm, distress or annoyance to members of the public.
Weird line they take pulling up on you - seems totally unnecessary like they already had a problem with you just for existing.
Will there be any reprimand for the officers involved (assuming you win your case, which seems likely)? It would feel a bit galling if they can completely fabricate a story based on nothing, presumably just out of spite, and not have to suffer any consequences. These aren't the sort of people who should have any business enforcing the law.
Surely the judge just throws this out? That footage is the most pointless thing I’ve seen. They’ll probably try and blame you for knocking down that road sign