Op had a favourite corner in Morrisons where he liked to boot it as the sound his illegal exhaust made was pant twitching. Op got section 59 for being a yob. Op is rich so has the means to waste police time and try and squirm out of it, despite fully acknowledging he did it.I can’t find the original post regarding the police issue, can anyone nutshell? I’m having a confusing time trying to work out what was the cause of all this
Posting in support of kindai doesn't mean you can claim you have a friend with a LamboDlockers is frothing rabidly at folks that can afford spicy motors while he sits posting in his toy car typing on his zx spectrum crying .
You're*Your seething arent you
Op had a favourite corner in Morrisons where he liked to boot it as the sound his illegal exhaust made was pant twitching. Op got section 59 for being a yob. Op is rich so has the means to waste police time and try and squirm out of it, despite fully acknowledging he did it.
Right, but he isn't looking for a procedural change outcome and pat on the back - he wants his S59 removed. It's purely selfish.The biggest problem with this is the police haven't done their job properly. Evidence going missing, statements not being made by the 472 officers there.
Right, but he isn't looking for a procedural change outcome and pat on the back - he wants his S59 removed. It's purely selfish.
He wants it removed because it'll affect the resale of his carHe wants it removed because the officers acted like chodes.
They used unnecessary force (6 of them ffs). They tried to charge him with x, y and z, charges which clearly were not applicable.
It will have absolutely nothing to do with the resale of the car? What an odd viewpointHe wants it removed because it'll affect the resale of his car
Op had a favourite corner in Morrisons where he liked to boot it as the sound his illegal exhaust made was pant twitching. Op got section 59 for being a yob. Op is rich so has the means to waste police time and try and squirm out of it, despite fully acknowledging he did it.
It will have absolutely nothing to do with the resale of the car? What an odd viewpoint
S59 stays with the car and causes a nightmare for the driver. There are a couple of examples in this thread of folks unknowingly purchasing cars with S59 markers and then having to get shot of them fairly quickly due to unnecessary attention.It will have absolutely nothing to do with the resale of the car? What an odd viewpoint
S59 stays with the car and causes a nightmare for the driver. There are a couple of examples in this thread of folks unknowingly purchasing cars with S59 markers and then having to get shot of them fairly quickly due to unnecessary attention.
How many section 59s have you received for nailing the throttle on the supermarket run?Well its not hurting values he is like 20-30k up on what he paid.
Also I think a general S59 last 12 months.
Also when a vehicle is sold the new keeper and write to the issuing constabulary with proof of new ownership and request it’s removed.
How many section 59s have you received for nailing the throttle on the supermarket run?
yes its 12months but for us we tried all the writing to issuing constabulary etc had all the proof and they still would not remove it. maybe we were just unlucky , maybe not the problem of certain officers with too much power has been around a long time.Well its not hurting values he is like 20-30k up on what he paid.
Also I think a general S59 last 12 months.
Also when a vehicle is sold the new keeper and write to the issuing constabulary with proof of new ownership and request it’s removed.
yes its 12months but for us we tried all the writing to issuing constabulary etc had all the proof and they still would not remove it. maybe we were just unlucky , maybe not the problem of certain officers with too much power has been around a long time.
we could have gone down the legal route but to us it would have been too much money in the long run so my son decided to get shut abroad, because he had that option.
on a ordinary car like a 5 series it would have had financial implications if he had sold it in this country and told the new owner about the s59 but in france no difference. he just didnt want 6 months or so of being stopped all the time and the hassle it would bring.
personally i think its a horrible system that a marker is put on a car . why not just put it on the driver or better still charge the driver and prosecute.
if they have enough evidence for the s59 then prosecute, its like a caution but with teeth, so any officer can stop the vehicle at a later date and have it removed.
no doubt in the ops case the police would probably do a photo op outside there headquarters or post it on facebook etc. all we want is for them to do there job...........