Poll: ** The iPhone 7 and 7 Plus Thread **

Which colour iPhone 7 or 7 Plus are you going for?

  • Jet Black (gloss)

    Votes: 84 12.9%
  • Black

    Votes: 207 31.8%
  • Silver

    Votes: 30 4.6%
  • Gold

    Votes: 11 1.7%
  • Rose Gold

    Votes: 7 1.1%
  • I wanted one, but the lack of headphone jack is a deal breaker

    Votes: 76 11.7%
  • I'm not buying one

    Votes: 236 36.3%

  • Total voters
    651
I have a buyer lined up, and an active local community page I could sell if that failed. Should sell fine, sim free from Apple, perfect condition (no marks), AppleCare+ for duration (not used any of the 2 claims), unused accessories, fully boxed with all receipts.
 
Are the 14% of people who consider the lack of a 3.5mm socket a deal-breaker aware that it comes with an adapter?

Yeah I would not be surprised that a few don't know that, but all you have to do is take it out of the box with the phone and stick it on the end of your favourite head/earphones and forget about it. And if you do happen to lose it it's only £9 to replace not £29.
 
reminds me of the fuss people made when they went from 30 pin to lightning.

That was understandable back then as its easier to connect and speeds up transfer rates. You can changing from one proprietary connector to another.

But removing the 3.5mm is Apple's backdoor way of tying people more into their economic system which will cost customers more in the long run. I just love the way Apple explains it as its a benefit to the customer.

"We removed the 3.5mm port to give more space to fit XYZ component" Yeah....dont lie to us! ;)
 
They removed it because it's outdated tech.

Look at when they removed the floppy, everyone kicked off.

Some Android sets already with USB-C only.
 
Last edited:
That was understandable back then as its easier to connect and speeds up transfer rates. You can changing from one proprietary connector to another.

But removing the 3.5mm is Apple's backdoor way of tying people more into their economic system which will cost customers more in the long run. I just love the way Apple explains it as its a benefit to the customer.

"We removed the 3.5mm port to give more space to fit XYZ component" Yeah....dont lie to us! ;)

People said the same about floppy drives, same about optical drives. People do not like change straight away.

The only real draw back is not being able to charge whilst using headphones. But I can't remember the last time I did that.
 
People said the same about floppy drives, same about optical drives. People do not like change straight away.

The only real draw back is not being able to charge whilst using headphones. But I can't remember the last time I did that.

Nor me. I think once during a job interview. I always tend to use the apple earphones for that rather than holding the phone to my head.

With low power mode and how long these phones last now, it can be worked around.

Doesn't bother me one bit, kudos to Apple for trend setting. 5 years from now every flagship Android phone will be USB-C audio.
 
Last edited:
I'm not anywhere near as annoyed as I should be that it's missing. No biggie at all in my eyes.

They've included the adaptor and it's cheap. Knowing Apple it could've been £25
 
Nor me. I think once during a job interview. I always tend to use the apple earphones for that rather than holding the phone to my head.

With low power mode and how long these phones last now, it can be worked around.

Doesn't bother me one bit, kudos to Apple for trend setting. 5 years from now every flagship Android phone will be USB-C audio.

I do think that Apple missed a trick of making it USB-C instead of Lightning though... Especially as the Macs are going that way, and they are rumoured to have invented the connection.
 
They removed it because it's outdated tech.

This. An ancient analogue connector has no business being on a modern piece of digital equipment. Use the adapter if you need to, end of. If you really must charge at the same time then loads of third-party options will appear, some of them Chinese and costing about 3p.

The whingers need to get over themselves. Within a few years the 3.5mm jack on phones will be a thing of the past. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it disappears from the Galaxy S8 or S9.

I do think that Apple missed a trick of making it USB-C instead of Lightning though... Especially as the Macs are going that way, and they are rumoured to have invented the connection.

Lightning pre-dates USB-C. I grant that apple like their own connection standards anyway but, when they introduced it, there was no existing standard which did the same job and they're hardly likely to change it to USB-C now.

Apple change their connectors far less frequently than their competitors do. How many USB standards and connectors have we had? I can't keep up.

Now we have USB-C which everyone keeps hailing as the future but looks pretty lacklustre to me. Yet again they've focused on the protocol side of the standard, rambling on about how it can do everything and carry all types of data, yet they've neglected the mechanical side of it completely, leaving us with ancient friction-fit connectors and a standard so poor that using the wrong cables can fry your kit.

I'd prefer it if the rest of the industry adopted Apple's standards - Lightning is a superb piece of design by comparison.
 
Don't care. Majority of cases I use headphones is not whilst charging so an extra adapter I don't really care about.

Have been considering Bluetooth headphones for a while so on d my trusted RHAs give up will move over.
 
Thank you for correcting my spelling.

They removed the 64gb phone, so effectively it forces you to pay more to have the ability to use the phone in same way as you did.

As far as Brexit is concerned if the pound returns to levels that it was before can we expect a price drop?

On price gouging, I was exaggerating to make a point. However I do feel their stuff is approaching crazy levels. £819 for a phone is rather amazing don't you think?

Your stomach is hardier than mine it seems.

Honestly? If it ever did get back to 1.5 or higher then yes I suspect they would drop the price because for the most part it's not like they're actually seeing any benefit for putting the price up but they're getting a load of grief for it? I think they'd put it back.

And it's not so much being hardy, yes £819 is a lot of money but I guess I think it's worth it (technically not, I went for the 128gb 7) but either way, even something seemingly silly like offering 32, 64, 128 and 256 would add a massive amount of inventory to the channel.

Also, I know you're not saying anything specific on this but I do believe nice things cost money. Yes I could get something technically as good for a lot less but IMO having fought with an S7 edge for a few weeks I can tell you, I think that premium of a couple of hundred quid over the top of the range Samsung (which lets be honest is the only sensible benchmark) is totally worth it, they've got close but the iPhone is still a level of polish above. IMO IMO IMO!

Let's be honest, they are being greedy. Their price increase is around 140% of the forex movement and they could easily swallow half of the cost of the movement. The difference in pricing between the different memory levels is ridiculous. I'm not saying Apple owe anything to anyone but they are being purely greedy.

mmmm I dunno.. 639 to 699 (in my case) is 10%, 1.33 to 1.46 which is broadly what the move has been is also about 10%.. more to the point can you imagine if Tim Cook said their profitability had dropped because they'd done one of their major markets a solid and swallowed some forex moves?

steve jobs said:
What ruined Apple wasn’t growth … They got very greedy. Instead of following the original trajectory of the original vision, which was to make the thing an appliance and get this out there to as many people as possible, they went for profits. They made outlandish profits for about four years… What that cost them was their future. What they should have been doing is making rational profits and going for market share

Steve Jobs, 1995.

Oh yeah.. Apple were making entirely non premium price champion devices all the way through his reign.

Greed is not the same thing as being premium. Greed is selling something you have no right to charge a lot for at a high price, like old post Jobs apple did, dining out purely on the name. Nowadays it's more a situation like with.. I dunno.. Vaios of old, Samsung 4K TVs, Nike trainers, BMW cars etc.. attainable specs, not necessarily the best but executed better than the rest with a price tag to go with it.

Premium. Not greedy.
 
I don't know whats happened but I'm considering getting the AirPods. But this price seems astronomical when I could spend an extra hundred and get some good cans.
 
it's the reality distortion field :)

In fairness I draw the line there, I see a lot of bluetooth headphones and there's much better out there, more stylish, better fitting etc etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom