Those OCZ drives are pretty much the fastest SSDs around at the moment and they will certainly best both of the SSDs in the EEE.
Did you mean they will beat both of the SSD's jimmy, just couldn't quite understand what you said.
Those OCZ drives are pretty much the fastest SSDs around at the moment and they will certainly best both of the SSDs in the EEE.
is the 901 20gb ssd split into 2 ssd drives? 8 gb + 16gb? thats what ive heard but i might be wrong
i do prefer the 901 myself, i think the 1000 is a bit too big, its heading too much into the laptop size for my liking
I got a 900 20G today as an upgrade to my 701 4G. I know its basically the same hardware but it was £200 and worth every penny.
Screen is much better
Although the 4/16 combo isnt ideal and the 16G is generally classed as to slow for the OS, its still faster than the 8GB SDHC card I had in the 701.
Keyboard is better than the 701
I havent tested the battery out yet and I did get stuffed with a 4400 battery again but have a 10400 battery from the 701...although its black and the 900 is white so looks a little like a zebra
Found a great program for installing via USB too: http://www.msfn.org/board/How-to-install-from-USB-WinSetupFromUSB-t120444.html
Works great with my 450MB after install nlite'd XP too.
Did you mean they will beat both of the SSD's jimmy, just couldn't quite understand what you said.
Those OCZ drives are pretty much the fastest SSDs around at the moment and they will certainly best both of the SSDs in the EEE.
I use zero VM on XP and never had a problem.
Get the usual error message on startup as you would expect and I have even got a few messages while running firefox and playing media on it. I have set it to 512mb now, doesn't seem any faster, although windows has stopped grumbling.
Dave
I thought Intels new 80gb was considerably faster? Considerably more expensive than a 32gb OCZ though.