-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The RT Related Games, Benchmarks, Software, Etc Thread.
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
- Status
Np. With all the discussion of VRAM it's easy to miss read the graphs.
Always hate graphs like that, never show the full story and if like 1-3 fps difference, initially it looks massive because of the way they have done the graph.
Either way, 3080 got a massive lead according to them.
Shame the game is **** compared to the first but I'll give it a play again with rtx and do some comparisons screenshots.
Either way, 3080 got a massive lead according to them.
Shame the game is **** compared to the first but I'll give it a play again with rtx and do some comparisons screenshots.
Had a quick play, so far, pretty good!
- reflections as expected a million time better
- ray tracing lighting effects seem extremely minimal
- either my eye sight has gotten worse or this is perhaps using 2.2 or an even newer version of dlss as this is fantastic and notice literally zero motion issues in this, saying that, performance even without dlss is superb
For good screenshots comparisons, nvidia got pretty good ones:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforc...ay-tracing-nvidia-dlss-upgrade-available-now/
Mine, mix of dlss off and on (quality) and some with ray off and on
- reflections as expected a million time better
- ray tracing lighting effects seem extremely minimal
- either my eye sight has gotten worse or this is perhaps using 2.2 or an even newer version of dlss as this is fantastic and notice literally zero motion issues in this, saying that, performance even without dlss is superb
For good screenshots comparisons, nvidia got pretty good ones:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforc...ay-tracing-nvidia-dlss-upgrade-available-now/
Mine, mix of dlss off and on (quality) and some with ray off and on
Why is such a big difference between the first set of pictures? Look at the reflections in the right ( top right )Had a quick play, so far, pretty good!
- reflections as expected a million time better
- ray tracing lighting effects seem extremely minimal
- either my eye sight has gotten worse or this is perhaps using 2.2 or an even newer version of dlss as this is fantastic and notice literally zero motion issues in this, saying that, performance even without dlss is superb
For good screenshots comparisons, nvidia got pretty good ones:
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforc...ay-tracing-nvidia-dlss-upgrade-available-now/
Mine, mix of dlss off and on (quality) and some with ray off and on
2080ti pulling ahead of even the 3070ti due to vram
Jensen September 2020: "faster than the 2080ti and just $499"
yeah right, yeah right
dont like jensen but i'm big oof for this mistake
wrink probably right, difference probs stems from dlss core difference (although in most games they perform the same, this one seems to be an outlier)
i mistaken the lower fps numbers as %1 lows, but then i realized it always shows native fps so 3070 tying 2080ti there (unless nvidia didn't do some special setting wizardry)
my hate for nvidia/8 gb vram seem to make me ignorant/blind my eyes sometimes, so i apologise, again, from everyone
Associate
With everything set to ultra nightmare at 4K, ray tracing on DLSS off the game is reporting according to afterburner 9.6GB of actual VRAM usage. With DLSS at quality that drops to 8.9GB.
My total allocated VRAM with everything I have running is 11.5GB/12GB and the game is using that amount above.
DLSS Off
DLSS On (Quality)
My total allocated VRAM with everything I have running is 11.5GB/12GB and the game is using that amount above.
DLSS Off
DLSS On (Quality)
And as suspected, looks like nvidia are sponsoring bf 2042 (dlss and reflex support) alongside microsoft. No mention of ray tracing but in the gameplay reveal, reflections/water puddles looked ray traced..... Also, would be a bit odd if it didn't have any ray traced effects, since bf 5 had ray traced reflections.
https://wccftech.com/battlefield-20...ing-dlss-and-reflex-and-xbox-as-its-partners/
Reflections of the lights on the glass. The last screenshots are what's on the left side for the first set of screenshots.
Yup, definitely just reflections it seems as lighting doesn't change much at all, another one showing the lack of change for lighting effects:
Game is hardly taxing my 3080 at all.
https://wccftech.com/battlefield-20...ing-dlss-and-reflex-and-xbox-as-its-partners/
Reflections of the lights on the glass. The last screenshots are what's on the left side for the first set of screenshots.
Yup, definitely just reflections it seems as lighting doesn't change much at all, another one showing the lack of change for lighting effects:
Game is hardly taxing my 3080 at all.
Soldato
If you turn on the in game metrics we can see if RT/DLSS is on/off. Personally I'm not sure RT is worth the 50 FPS hit 
Though I did not try DLSS so if 2.2 is as good as claimed...
Though I did not try DLSS so if 2.2 is as good as claimed...
If you turn on the in game metrics we can see if RT/DLSS is on/off. Personally I'm not sure RT is worth the 50 FPS hit
Though I did not try DLSS so if 2.2 is as good as claimed...
I only played 15mins. DLSS looks very good as I didn't notice any issue at 1440p DLSS Quality. Just at the point where you get your 2nd upgrade there is a very rough and dirty relective surface that I noticed my own reflection in. That makes RT worth it
With everything set to ultra nightmare at 4K, ray tracing on DLSS off the game is reporting according to afterburner 9.6GB of actual VRAM usage. With DLSS at quality that drops to 8.9GB.
My total allocated VRAM with everything I have running is 11.5GB/12GB and the game is using that amount above.
DLSS Off
DLSS On (Quality)
In that comparison, DLSS looks better than Native. That's the sort of thing FSR just can't do
RTX makes a nice difference to non reflective surfaces too
DLSS comparison:
Really no need to use dlss at all for this though, fantastic optimisation on the whole, they could have easily added more ray tracing effects given all the performance on the table left.
DLSS comparison:
Really no need to use dlss at all for this though, fantastic optimisation on the whole, they could have easily added more ray tracing effects given all the performance on the table left.
Suspended
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 31,179
Iirc it was done for the consoles in mind too so in that regard the 'light touch' isn't a surprise. Might check this out too
Iirc it was done for the consoles in mind too so in that regard the 'light touch' isn't a surprise. Might check this out too
Yup no surprise, consoles/amd holding back nvidia/pc
What comparison if they both have the same FPS?DLSS comparison:
Really no need to use dlss at all for this though, fantastic optimisation on the whole, they could have easily added more ray tracing effects given all the performance on the table left.
- Status