Why not give AMD a chance to put it right before passing judgement?
![]()
Agreed completely. It's a very bold and brave move form AMD to put their hands up and looking to rectify.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Why not give AMD a chance to put it right before passing judgement?
![]()
I finally have my new rig running after a nightmare with intermittently faulty RAM. Is there any point in overclocking a 3600? Will it help in games etc. I’ve yet to see mine hit 4150mhz on HWMonitor.
Has anyone done any analysis regarding which RAM timings are actually worth playing with? I suspect primary timings account for something like 90% of the performance improvements gained by manually tuning timings.No, but if you want to learn how to tune your RAM with DRam Calc you could see upto 20% FPS gains.
Having said that this would only apply where the CPU is bottlenecking the GPU, which i think is probably unlikely unless its an RTX 2080TI?
Watch this, its interesting if nothing else..
No, but if you want to learn how to tune your RAM with DRam Calc you could see upto 20% FPS gains.
Having said that this would only apply where the CPU is bottlenecking the GPU, which i think is probably unlikely unless its an RTX 2080TI?
Watch this, its interesting if nothing else..
Cheers Pal. Worth looking into for those sorts of gains. Not OC’d ram before though. No doubt it will be a massive battle in the bios![]()
Has anyone done any analysis regarding which RAM timings are actually worth playing with? I suspect primary timings account for something like 90% of the performance improvements gained by manually tuning timings.
There seems to be quite a few people who are misunderstanding what the advertised boost clocks mean. I've had to point out to several folk that it shouldn't be surprising that their 3600 isn't boosting to 4.2GHz on all cores at the same time.So what are peoples thoughts on the news that AMD have suggested they can push out further optimisations to ensure better (to advertised) booting via the BIOS?
There seems to be quite a few people who are misunderstanding what the advertised boost clocks mean. I've had to point out to several folk that it shouldn't be surprising that their 3600 isn't boosting to 4.2GHz on all cores at the same time.
My 3600x won't exceed 4105 on any core with a x570 Asus TUF. Even a single core load test.
The only way hit 4.4 is overclock all the cores to 4.4, which is stable/none throttling at 72c under all core load.
There's obviously an issue with the bios as the bits can do it.
This forum needs to update its emojis, they are rubbish..
My 3600x won't exceed 4105 on any core with a x570 Asus TUF. Even a single core load test.
The only way hit 4.4 is overclock all the cores to 4.4, which is stable/none throttling at 72c under all core load.
There's obviously an issue with the bios as the bits can do it.
Hi.
What voltage did you use to get 4.4? I managed to get mine to 4.2 stable using 1.325v. This was just adjusting the multiplier and cpu voltage, didn’t tweak any other settings. Highest temp I saw was 67 degrees during a 20 cycle IBT (very high) stress test.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
You must have a good chip there as I can’t get above 4200 stable. 4300 won’t boot, 4250 needs 1.41 and fails IBT stress test after about 30 mins, with a temp of 77 degrees.
are you using a 3600x or 3600?