weescott said:It's all in the sticky you know
![]()
That thing's 26 pages, I'm not trauling through all of that in a hurry!I'll stick you in the table this evening.
weescott said:It's all in the sticky you know
![]()
That thing's 26 pages, I'm not trauling through all of that in a hurry!
). Will have to try to regain it then - if not, it'll be phase time when I get back from Egypt.




A.N.Other said:Bad luck Stan maybe with phase! Does a nice Pi time though - not too shabby at all. Like your desktop btw

It's better to have tight timings if you can, but it doesn't make a massive difference with A64. The Socket A chips really benefitted from having a 1:1 CPU:RAM and tight timings, but modern AMDs aren't quite the same.Foehammer2003 said:Now i have tighter timings will this have any impact on my CPU OC? just i think i remember reading somewhere that A64 like tight timings, as before getting over 2.4Ghz was a big no no!
Foehammer2003 said:I just read on a different forum post that if i disable the 'spread spectrum' option this is the lock option...
Some people say they get a few 100 extra MHz by disabling it - I couldn't tell you, personally. However, I would tend to trust those who know ^looks upwards^.Foehammer2003 said:I just read on a different forum post that if i disable the 'spread spectrum' option this is the lock option, if it is, does that mean i should be able to get further with my OC?
If people hadn't worked it out by now, the table is sorted by clock (descending), VCore (ascending) and then by name (ascending).A.N.Other said:Why do you have a 9x multi? You won't see an improvement having a 289 FSB over a 260 afaik. Have you compared the two or just gone straight for that setting?