That thing's 26 pages, I'm not trauling through all of that in a hurry!weescott said:It's all in the sticky you know
I'll stick you in the table this evening.
That thing's 26 pages, I'm not trauling through all of that in a hurry!weescott said:It's all in the sticky you know
A.N.Other said:Bad luck Stan maybe with phase! Does a nice Pi time though - not too shabby at all. Like your desktop btw
It's better to have tight timings if you can, but it doesn't make a massive difference with A64. The Socket A chips really benefitted from having a 1:1 CPU:RAM and tight timings, but modern AMDs aren't quite the same.Foehammer2003 said:Now i have tighter timings will this have any impact on my CPU OC? just i think i remember reading somewhere that A64 like tight timings, as before getting over 2.4Ghz was a big no no!
Foehammer2003 said:I just read on a different forum post that if i disable the 'spread spectrum' option this is the lock option...
Some people say they get a few 100 extra MHz by disabling it - I couldn't tell you, personally. However, I would tend to trust those who know ^looks upwards^.Foehammer2003 said:I just read on a different forum post that if i disable the 'spread spectrum' option this is the lock option, if it is, does that mean i should be able to get further with my OC?
A.N.Other said:Why do you have a 9x multi? You won't see an improvement having a 289 FSB over a 260 afaik. Have you compared the two or just gone straight for that setting?